Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US spies blamed Iran for Lockerbie bomb

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 05:17 AM
Original message
US spies blamed Iran for Lockerbie bomb
Source: sunday times

American intelligence documents blaming Iran for the Lockerbie bombing would have been produced in court if the Libyan convicted of Britain’s worst terrorist attack had not dropped his appeal.

Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, a former Libyan intelligence officer expected to be freed this week, had instructed his lawyers to produce internal US intelligence communications unavailable to his defence team at his trial in 2000.

The cables, from the American Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), suggest that Iran was behind the attack on Pan Am flight 103, which killed 270 people in 1988, in response to the shooting down of an Iranian commercial airliner by the USS Vincennes, an American warship, five months earlier.

One document that the defence team had planned to produce was a memo from the DIA dated September 24, 1989. It states: “The bombing of the Pan Am flight was conceived, authorised and financed by Ali-Akbar (Mohtashemi-Pur), the former Iranian minister of interior.


Read more: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6797773.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh.
What would be the reason we didn't want that story told? What would be the reason we indicted a different nation? I'm a simple woman of my people. Could someone please tell me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Reckon that's only half the story.
Prosecuting and jailing Al-Meghrahi was a bit like busting Madoff, it ensured the focus remained on just one 'evil' perpetrator.

Al-Meghrahi has dropped his second appeal against sentence in return for a possible 'compassionate grounds' release due to advanced prostate cancer.

Yep, I expect it is of the utmost importance to former US Veep George Bush Sr (1980-84 & 1988-92) to close the entire topic.

Especially the production in court of the Pan Am 103 passenger list showing who had cancelled their flight reservations at the very last minute.

Always reckoned it was an assassination attempt carefully but incompetently choreographed with the help of Bush Sr's UK accomplice Margaret Thatcher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Al-Megrahi’s release ‘would free BP’ to join the rush for Libya’s oil
Sunday Times, 16/8/09



The release of the Lockerbie bomber from prison would liberate Britain’s largest industrial company from a string of problems hampering its $900 million (£546 million) Libyan gas projects, industry sources claimed last night.

BP, the oil giant, signed a deal with Libya in 2007 to explore for gas in the west of the country and offshore. But since then it has faced a string of bureaucratic obstacles, including delays securing official permits and approvals to import equipment through Libyan customs, the sources said.

They added that BP’s work programme, conducting geological studies on the Sitre basin, an offshore block the size of Belgium, had been hit by delays securing official paperwork for the next scheduled phase of work. “Now that al-Megrahi is released, BP expects to get the go-ahead,” said one source in Libya.

Dr Bassam Fattouh, an expert on the Libyan oil industry at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, added that Libya, which was opened up to foreign companies after sanctions were lifted in 2003, had proved to be a “difficult business environment” for BP and other companies. “BP was having difficulty getting heavy equipment into the country,” he said. However, BP denied that it had faced anything more than routine problems in Libya. A spokesman said that the company was very happy with progress so far.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6797118.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-16-09 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not sure I believe this either.
But it seems likely that Libya wasn't behind it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC