Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The President & Secretary of Defense are already the "War Czars"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:50 PM
Original message
The President & Secretary of Defense are already the "War Czars"
in as much as anyone within the executive office is a "war czar" or czars.


SDef

"The Secretary of Defense is the principal defense policy adviser to the President and is responsible for the formulation of general defense policy and policy related to all matters of direct concern to the Department of Defense, and for the execution of approved policy. Under the direction of the President, the Secretary exercises authority, direction and control over the Department of Defense. The Secretary of Defense is a member of the President's Cabinet and of the National Security Council."

Office of the Secretary of Defense and Offices under the Secretary of Defense


Bush wants 'war czar' for Iraq

"The "war czar" would report directly to Bush and national security adviser Stephen Hadley and co-ordinate policy with agencies like the Pentagon and the state department, which at times have their own competing agendas."

Note the language: "The "war czar" would report directly to Bush and national security adviser Stephen Hadley" - Congress seems to be missing from that equation.



Factor in this : The Secretary of Defense releases an Annual Report to the President and the Congress - per statutory requirement - U.S.C. Title 10

A "war czar" that reports directly to the President and Hadley can potentially by-pass Congress. Secretary of Defense Gates would still have to release an annual report to Congress - BUT - there's no guarantee that the actions of a "war czar" would make it into such a report.



Also from the article Bush wants 'war czar' for Iraq :

"There's no job description. Again it's very much in the nascent stages," Perino told reporters.

"They are considering a wide range of options," she said."

"... the White House is considering creating a "war czar" post in the National Security Council..."


Wonderful. A made up position created within the National Security Council to promote Bush's failing war policies. No job description leaves the potential for abuse wide open.


1 - Why is Secretary of Defense Gates willing to give up the authority that comes along with his office?


And not likely to be forgotten:

Under the Constitution - "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States"

In addition to a CinC and a Secretary of Defense, we have Joint Chiefs, Chiefs of Staff, and Secretaries of the various armed forces. ALL subject to Congressional oversight.


2 - Will a "war czar" have Congressional oversight?



A handy person to blame, yes - when the time comes - but what else are they up to with this "war czar"?


"Bush spokesperson Dana Perino said the White House was considering many options after the resignation announcement of Meghan O'Sullivan, the top National Security Council official on Iraq and Afghanistan, and the completion of strategic reviews on the two conflicts."

3 - O'Sullivan resigned, why not just fill her job instead of creating a new position?











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Shipwack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have the perfect candidate...
Time to go to "Old Faithful", the loyal dog who keeps crawling to lick the hand that beats him... who will gladly and stoically endure any humiliation... that old soldier that will -always- follow orders (even if those orders cause him to betray every oath he ever swore to God and his fellow man...

Colin Powell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Nah...Rumsfeld...it's not like he ever left
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. The War preznit needs someone
to blame for his disaster in Iraq. Wazza matta, no takers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. WANTED: War Czar
Requirements: Must be as chip-chip-chipper as Baghdad Bob on a clear day. Must have 50-50 vision, kissing the GOP administration butts 50% of the time and kissing the GOP administration butts the other 50% of the time. Must be able to move his lips while talking out of his ass. Must understand the concept of throwing kindling on a fire to put it out. Must be able to hold his breath for 2 years, while clinging to the anchor that he is being tied to. Cannot have any compunction against torture. Would like to have experience in average Indiana marketplace.
Please fill out form. If you run out of room for felony convictions, continue on a blank page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The probably is the job description word for word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Hi happygoluckytoyou!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's no fun anymore!



Now that his army is broken someone else can play with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. you hit the point exactly
Bush wants to control these agencies from the White House. They are full of career folks who need whatever independence they have left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Another power grab - concentration of power without oversight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerryme1 Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don Imus for WAR CZAR!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. We all have to get things out of our system from time to time
Kind of like a fart - maybe not as smelly...but equally as satisfying I trust
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC