Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Imus firing had NOTHING to do with the racist remarks; it had to do with the money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:28 PM
Original message
The Imus firing had NOTHING to do with the racist remarks; it had to do with the money
MSNBC stood to lose.
So much for principles.
On a side note...when Rush Limbaugh called Mayor Ray Nagin a "nigger", I wrote the FCC about allowing hate speech on the airwaves.
I received back a canned reply about the First Amendment.
Now...the FCC is going to investigate Imus for the same type of comment? Yet Rush has the cover of the First Amendment?
What kind of cluster fuck is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's always the money.
Gotta hit them in the pocketbook by having the advertisers pull their ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Spot on

...I agree. It's about the money and only the money.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Correct
Advertisers pulled the plug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. You got it; money talks and racism had nothing to do with it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. True but he really messed with
the wrong group of women. Rutgers has power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Rutgers was willing to give him his say; his firing happened first.
I don't know how much power Rutgers really used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. One down. It's a start. What's to complain about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. But their advertisers pulled because
Edited on Wed Apr-11-07 05:32 PM by zidzi
of the pressure of the people..we didn't like the hateful racist, sexist slurs of ol' imus and mcquirk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanYorkstein Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. yep - *we* did this - I say we keep it up
Who's next? I vote for Michael Savage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. The is the beginning of the
end of hatemongers on our airwaves. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe now the momentum will turn its attention to reich-wing radio now.
They need to be put on notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. He was fired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:33 PM
Original message
Yep. Breaking news now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. yep, way cool. i suppose cbs will not keep him either. or at least he won't be on tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. MSNBC will no longer simulcast his show on their network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. We should contact every sponsor who bailed on Imus and put pressure
on them to be consistent. No advertising on any hate monger's program. Period.

So far I've only written to Bigelow Tea and Staples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Of course you are correct
Edited on Wed Apr-11-07 05:35 PM by slackmaster
I find it amusing when people say Imus' "freedom of speech" is being infringed. Only governments can infringe on your rights. People can only harass you, and when that goes beyond a certain threshold it becomes criminal.

With the exercise of freedoms come consequences. One has to be accountable for one's actions.

The consequences of making racist remarks sometimes include getting Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton in your face, which in turn has economic consequences as your advertisers flee the sinking ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Um, well, yes.
And advertisers pulled their money because they didn't want to be associated with that racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. When did he get fired? I thought he was just suspended for 2 weeks? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Just announced on MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's fine. There was a principle behind the losing of that money.
For once, the corps did the right thing. Rush could be next. This could be a turning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Proctor and Gamble and Staples carry huge sticks. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. If CBS radio (?) has any class, they will fire him COMPLETELY! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Fields Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. The CBS board of directors is weighing the situation and mulling things over.
In other words, determining how much revenue will be lost from embarrassed advertisers.

My opinion? He's toast at CBS, also.

Hopefully he will head down to New Mexico permanently and get a job at some redneck radio station, where he can play Lucinda Williams and Big and Rich to his heart's content, and still spew his venom in between.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. You know it's about the money
His two biggest advertisers cancelled. I'm sure there were many more than haven't been announced yet.

It's all about the money, and evidently, according to FDL, this has been turned over to the FCC as well.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. You can't lose a sponsor like Procter & Gamble and expect
your show to survive for long. I almost feel sorry for him. Almost.

The question for MSNBC is whether they'll replace him with some right wing hack from talk radio or if they'll search for another Olberman.

Imus still has radio, doesn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh, lay off Rush, for crying out loud.
when Rush Limbaugh called Mayor Ray Nagin a "nigger",

All the OxyMoron ever did was refer to America's Worst Mayor(TM) as "Mayor 'Nayger'". That's not at all the same thing as calling him the N-word so stop saying that! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. There's nobody to lay off Rush but Rush himself
He's self-employed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sure it did
But the public pressure was what made the advertisers leave. Normal people can make a difference by using their First Amendment rights to speak out, protest, and boycott. It was about principles, in a roundabout way. MSNBC & the advertisers had to drop Imus, because people said they weren't going to stand for his hatefulness anymore. You don't like Rush Limbaugh? Do the same thing - organize, pressure, boycott guests & advertisers on his show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. So start demanding that money be pulled from backing the likes
of O'Reilly and Beck and Limbaugh and Hannity. Malkin, Coulter, Boortz and Smerconish. There are tons of them out there. Marginalize them and drive them out. There needs to be this level of outcry every time one of those divisive hatemongers lob a grenade out there. Shut them down from the public air waves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. I don't care why they did it as long as they did it.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oregonjen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. Why wasn't Rush fired after making those awful comments
about Michael J. Fox? The video of him shaking and saying Fox was faking it made me so sick. The outcry at that time was pretty strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. The difference between the Slimebaugh show and Imus is
the Rush Slimbeaugh show is more or less subsidized by the right wing corporations and probably the RNC contributes a few dollars..the times I have caught his show while scanning the stations he just doesn't have those high caliber sponsors..
The FCC is run by a Bush appointee and like every other department head is no doubt a yes man..Of course they wouldn't touch Slimebaugh.....
And as many times as O'liely has made racial comments nothing was said..and the list goes on ..Beck,Savage,Insanity.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
32. Now we need to pay more attention to Hannity & Limbaugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
33. if limbah-humbug called ray 'nigger' then there must be record of it...
i doubt that boor would make such a mistake, but if he did, then we should destroy him...
the pig selectively employs the rules.
back during reagan era, a huge story happened. Reagan's tax lawyer, roy miller's 20 year old son tortured, raped them murdered HIS MOTHER, roy miller's wife and reagan friend. It was the biggest story in history up til then, and overf a mile of satelite trucks were on highway near palo alto calif...then POOF! the story disappeared. Totally. Few people have even heard of it. Even the alternative press suddenly dropped it. There was a very good book about the case, which never even tried to explain why the story died suddenly and totally. Mike Miller got sent to mental hospital- his mother was instantly forgotten. note: this was before reagan killed the 'fairness doctrine'
------
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/sex_crimes/index.html?s=oldest&query=MENTAL%20HEALTH%20AND%20DISORDERS&field=des&match=exact

NATIONAL DESK
Killing Suspect Called Sane
UPI
Michael David Miller, the son of President Reagan's personal attorney, Roy Miller, is mentally fit to stand trial on charges that he raped and murdered his mother, according to psychiatrists. Michael Miller, 20 years old, was arrested March 25, a day after his mother, Marguerite, 52, was found dead by her husband. After the psychiatrists' findings were announced Friday, Judge Thomas Fredericks scheduled a Dec. 13 hearing in Superior Court to decide if the trial should proceed.

October 30, 1983 Health News
MORE ON SEX CRIMES AND: MURDERS AND ATTEMPTED MURDERS, CHILDREN AND YOUTH, MILLER, MARGUERITE, MILLER, MICHAEL DAVID, MILLER, ROY, CALIFORNIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Here you go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. thank you! now that you guys mention it, i remember....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. Can MSNBC be held responsible for libel in a lawsuit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC