Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I can't believe that what I am reading. They shouldn't arrest people with guns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
daedalus_dude Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:05 AM
Original message
I can't believe that what I am reading. They shouldn't arrest people with guns
at presidential events so they won't make them into martyrs? :eyes:

Read my lips: You cannot make the right like Obama. No amount of appeasement is gonna make them happy. If you let them get away with one thing, they will do a worse thing next time.

Here's what I think should happen: The guy should be charged with attempted assassination and locked away for fifteen years.

If that provokes more people to become stupid and bring guns to Obama speeches, good. More people to arrest and lock away. Eventually they will stop doing it, because this is a language they will understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. As I posted earlier
I think of it as a covert threat. Why else wear a gun to a protest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. I haven't decided what to think yet.
Somebody wants Americans to be thinking about an assassination attempt. That much is clear. Who it is, and why, is not clear.

If I were in charge of the SS detail and a citizen was blatantly wearing a gun and carrying a sign implying a threat, I would shut the whole freaking area down and search everyone else.

What better decoy than an obvious one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Distraction... Hmm...
That's a good point.

Or trying to rile them up, maybe, to get them to react over-the-top? Seems weird, though.

It still smells like a threat to me. Not necessarily against Obama, but against people who might protest THEIR protest. If you get my drift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. Overt threat.
This guy wanted to be seen as dangerous, as do his brethren who merely wield violent rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
36. Thanks. Gun clearly visible is not exactly covert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. I can't even imagine what would have happened
to a Democrat who strapped a pistol to their leg and got within a mile of King George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HubertHeaver Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Free trip to Cuba?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Probably they'd be held at Gitmo indefinitely without any formal charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hell, people got arrested for wearing the "wrong" T-shirts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Can you believe
the disparity? Have people already forgotten? Or do people just believe in the double standards of republicons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. "Have people already forgotten?"
Americans have very short memories, so yes- most of those who ever knew (which weren't too many to begin with) have since forgotten.



Three Medford school teachers were threatened with arrest and thrown out of the President Bush rally at the Jackson County Fairgrounds Thursday night, after they showed up wearing T-shirts with the slogan "Protect our civil liberties."

All three women said they were carrying valid tickets for the event that they had received from Republican Party headquarters in Medford, which had been distributing event tickets to Bush supporters.

More: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1015-06.htm

FEMA Worker Ordered Home: Woman, husband wore T-shirts with anti-Bush logo at July Fourth rally

According to this story in the Charleston (WV) Gazette, not only were a husband and wife arrested for trespassing for wearing T-shirts saying "Love America, Hate Bush" at a Bush rally in West Virginia on July 4th, but the wife, who worked for FEMA, was fired.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/7/9/182213/6424
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Maybe we need a viral Youtube video about this...
Or, at least a video we HOPE goes viral, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
42. they haven't forgotten
they're rw stooges.

that's pretty much it in a nutshell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
43. We have a President that respects laws and the Constitution
couldn't be happier that the protester was treated differently than how bush would have. Shows we are making progress in reestablishing the rule of law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. They would have disappeared after Baby Caligula declared them an enemy combatant...
... or whatever the bogus term in the USA PATRIOT Act was that he got to do on his say-so alone.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lagomorph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. He get an invitation to go hunting with Dick Cheney, of course...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. he would have been sent to Gitmo.....
...before he even entered!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. He would have been put in a "protest pen" along with all the others...
... I can't wait until I hear Republicans start saying we restrict protesters too much.

Have any of these protesters been caged into a "Free Speech Zone" yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
26. They'd be eating lemon chicken in Cuba before they knew what hit them. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Once again...
...the person with the gun was not on the parade route and did not enter the hall.

At no time was he anywhere near the President or had line of sight with him or his motorcade.

The Secret Service would not allow that, no matter what New Hampshire law says.

It is a National Security issue which supersedes both state law and any claimed 2nd amendment rights. Even the Supreme Court would understand this.

Anyone claiming otherwise is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. The guy who dropped the gun INSIDE the townhall in Arizona might be another matter, eh?
Oh wait- that was just a congressman....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Wait, what?
"It is a National Security issue which supersedes both state law and any claimed 2nd amendment rights. Even the Supreme Court would understand this."

I'm pretty sure the Constitution says no such thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Just as I'm pretty damn sure that the Supreme court would uphold such an arrest
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 02:55 AM by depakid
and prosecution under the appropriate federal law and make the exception for themselves.

As of course they should.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
33. What federal law? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. It doesn't
That does not mean that the PTB will not protect themselves despite what the laws say.

Never forget-Laws,like taxes,are for the little people. Some pigs really do think they are more equal than others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. Did you read this post? Who Is William Kostric? Seems he's not a spontanious protester
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 03:15 AM by notadmblnd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. If someone had worn a gun to a Bush event they likely would've become a real martyr. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. carrying a gun is legal - at what distance from a president does that law change?
I assume people invited in are screened for guns at events but not those who are just in the area who won't encounter the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. back in the 90's Clinton was rolling through the ATL area
and our office building had line of sight to the road where the presidential motorcade would be traveling. The Secret Service came and examined our building and the cars in the parking lot very thoroughly. They quizzed all the employees and one of the questions was, "Are you carrying or do you have in your possession today a firearm?" My answer was yes...I keep a firearm in my desk (well, I used to) and would transport it from home to the office daily. With my answer, the Secret Service agent interviewing me asked me if I would mind relinquishing the weapon during the short time required for the President to pass. I produced the weapon for him...he locked in a case for about two hours...and then politely returned it. I asked him if he had cleaned it and he simply smiled.

These guys are as professional as they come. I would have been within 50 yards of a president (granted he was doing about 70 miles per hour in a bullet proof limo) with a gun in my possession and the Secret Service handled me with respect and not an ounce of suspicion.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. Not an ounce of suspicion?
Then why the fuck did they come into your office asking questions? Because they thought the people in there were saints that would never ever think of harming another person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. they did that in every office building along that stretch...
and yes, you can do a job like securing the President without treating people like criminals. The agent interviewing me was at no time accusatory or suspicious. He asked his questions in a judicious manner...made a couple of notes...and did not TELL ME to give up my firearm. He asked me. Now, if I had said 'no' i imagine i would have had an escort for the next couple of hours.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Does not matter that he was nice about it.
He was still treating you like a criminal.
The tactic is called good cop-bad cop.If you would have said no you would have got to meet bad cop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. Exactly. Now I think the Secret Service guy was just doing his job but...
to say he didn't treat anyone with an ounce of suspicion is simply wrong.

He was suspicious that is why he took precautions. He didn't think the gun was going to jump up and shoot the President he though (had suspicion) that the owner might shoot the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. wow n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-13-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. MOM u/f
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
27. And now this hayseed is famous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
32. "The guy should be charged with attempted assassination" Thought crime?
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 08:02 AM by Statistical
If you don't like the law lobby to change it.

Charging the man with a non existent crime or one he didn't commit isn't exactly the indication of a free society.

It is something more akin to tyrannical regimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #32
39. I agree, and I'm as anti-gun as you'll find
Edited on Wed Aug-12-09 08:45 AM by Wednesdays
I have a suspicion that the OP is a "false flag" playing into the RW paranoia--"Obama is going to take away our guns!!!1!"

I mean, have the guy check in his weapon for the duration of the event, or escort him off the premises. But fifteen years' incarceration? Uh-huh. :eyes: Way to whip up that wingnut froth!

Unrec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
34. How about we arrest people who act unlawfully or actually make a threat.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
37. the guy's likely already a martyr for the right ...
he just hasn't had the ultimate qualification applied ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-12-09 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
38. So we should be authoritarian assholes like the Pukes are? Brilliant idea!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC