Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

San Francisco Chronicle Raises Questions About Gen. Abizaid's Role In Pat Tillman Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 11:53 AM
Original message
San Francisco Chronicle Raises Questions About Gen. Abizaid's Role In Pat Tillman Scandal
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003569924

'SF Chron' Raises Questions About Gen. Abizaid's Role in Pat Tillman Scandal

Published: April 11, 2007 11:30 AM ET

NEW YORK On Tuesday, news emerged that Congress would finally take a close look at how the Pentagon handled the friendly fire killing of former NFL star Pat Tillman. Today, the San Francisco Chronicle added fuel to the fire, with a proble by Robert Collier into apparent misleading comments by Gen. John Abizaid.

"Two weeks after the release of a Pentagon report about the death of former football star Pat Tillman, questions are emerging about when the commander of U.S. troops in Afghanistan learned that Tillman had been killed by fellow American soldiers and not by Taliban fighters, as the military had claimed," Collier opens.

"Gen. John Abizaid, then chief of U.S. Central Command, told investigators that he did not promptly receive a cable warning that Tillman was probably killed by friendly fire and urging that President Bush, in an upcoming speech, avoid any reference to Tillman's being killed by the Taliban.

"A Chronicle review of the 18-month investigation by the Pentagon's inspector general suggests that Abizaid's statement is open to dispute.
Abizaid told investigators that he was in Iraq when the cable was sent and did not receive it for '10-20' days. In fact, he reportedly was at Central Command's forward headquarters in Qatar at the time."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. They're all f**king liars. Every damn last one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. So any communications for the General is ignored when he is out of the office
Edited on Wed Apr-11-07 12:46 PM by LiberalFighter
for an extended period of time?

Maybe they should subpoena his communications at the Qatar headquarters.

Question. A person in his type of position similar to a CEO of a major company I would believe. Wouldn't that type of person have an administrative assistant with the responsibility of opening most if not all communication? And then prioritize from "must see" to "assistant handles" to "junk mail"? If "must see" makes sure that the boss gets it immediately even to the point of either sending the document or relaying by various available methods to the boss? DUH!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's so refreshing to see them cornered on their lies
They're also up against the wall in the attorney scandal....a hotbed of lies. :D

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC