Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seriously, what does "Chicago politics" really mean?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:04 AM
Original message
Seriously, what does "Chicago politics" really mean?

RWers, including some of our relatives, use that routinely in regard to the administration. It's become some kind of buzz word.
I could use some thoughts about the basic meaning(s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. ask them what they think it means when they use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. 10 to 1 they wouldn't be able to explain it
Probably something they heard either on FAUX or the leader of the GOP, Limbaugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Pay to play......
...is what comes to my mind.

I guess that's how I've been programmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. I do hear some of that theme. Like with grant announcements yesterday.

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Brown people. Lots of brown people. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. My guess is "using teh kurrupt negorez fer populizm!!one1!!"
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. They don't know
They are parroting something they hear on talk radio. Most of talk radio don't know what they mean. They pick it up from some political consultants. The consultants on the other hand are talking about the post machine kinda environment that exists there. Chicago politics is Illinois politics and they've gone through their share of govenors up there lately. It's shades of the old patronage system that existed in the days of the machine. You get ahead by helping those above you, and pulling those below you along as you go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the
"They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. *That's* the *Chicago* way!"

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094226/quotes


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. It means Democrats who aren't afraid to get their hands dirty/play rough. Though watching Obama
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 07:19 AM by KittyWampus
and Rahm, you notice Obama always manages to look like he's above it all whilst getting his licks in anyway.

It's a gift.

Edit- as others up-thread mentioned, I don't think they KNOW what it implies historically. They use it like a slur. Like "socialism". Or "poopiehead".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Sure seems like it by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. When I worked campaigns in my youth, we would find where the Republicans
stored their campaign materials and replace them with our own stuff. Republican campaign literature makes great litter on people's lawns, nothing gets a Chicagoan madder than his/her front lawn littered with Republican faces!:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. In downstate Illinois in the 60s
it meant machine politics which kept Richard Daily in power. There was a joke that Daily loved your family so much he even made sure your dead relatives made it to the polls on election day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. daley didn't nead dead people's votes to stay mayor.
he was HUGELY popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. "Richard J." was more effective than "Richard M.", who is running us into the ground!
Richard M. Daley is privatizing damn near every "public" service he can get away with merely to fill temporary gaps in his budget, expanding O'Hare when airlines are cutting back flights, moving a children's museum that already has a suitable location at Navy Pier, and his greatest boondoggle, the 2016 Olympics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. you're entitled to your opinions, i respectfully disagree.
although i don't support all the privatization, and i was extremely pissed at the way dumb-dumb daley handed the corrupt bus stop contract to the french company-
but...
i support moving the children's museum from navy pier to the park location.
i support expanding o'hare- an airport in peotone would be the REAL boondoggle.
i fully support the bid to get the 2016 olympics- but i suspect that they will end up in rio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Daley is opposed to the Peotone airport, he wants to continue O'Hare expansion!
Who is going to flying out on those extra O'Hare runways? Even the airlines don't support further expansion. http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/nov/20/travel/chi-ohare-20-nov20

Do you live in Chicago, or the suburbs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. i recently moved out of the city, to a far northwest suburb.
i oppose peotone, but favour o'hare expansion.

air travel may be down some now, but it will pick-up again, especially as the population grows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. When you move back to the City, get back to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. i'm not moving back to the city...but o'hare expansion is needed...
and affects everyone in the metro area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Peotone airport?
Would that be a third Chicago airport? (Just curious as someone with family in NW Indiana.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. a fourth one. or a sixth one, depending on how you view the area.
o'hare, midway, and gary indiana- the airport in gary already has a longer runway than midway.

add to those rockford and mitchell field in milwaukee- both used by people in the north/northwest suburbs- and the region already has plenty of coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. I lived in a downstate Republican stronghold
That was the excuse they gave for Daley winning all the time. Not sayin' it is true, just sayin' that that is probably what the repukes mean by "Chicago politics".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Daley, not Daily
Just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Same as 'San Francisco values' when they talk about Pelosi
Message: It's somehow bad and be very afraid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. "San Francisco values" is code, and specifically means "turning you gay"...
...while teaching sodomy to your children. It's not a vague slur at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. Pelosi is bad, but not for the reasons the right says...
She called Bush her president and Chavez a despot. No real progressive would say a thing like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. It's machine politics. One sprocket turns another from the Mayor down to the street captains.
See:

"Clout"

Influence or power in political and community circles. Originally popularized by Chicago journalist Mike Royko to describe local movers and shakers when Richard J. Daley was mayor in the Sixties and early Seventies. Usage spread nationally.
"Go get next to the alderman. He has the clout to get you that city contract, but you better be able to convince him what's in it for him."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Here's One Analysis.......
http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/989.html

This article talks about patronage and puts kind of a negative spin on Chicago politics.

I however, lived in Chicago all my life. We natives call it the "City that Works". If you've visited Chicago lately - it is really a beautiful and wonderful city to live in.

Chris Matthews of MSNBC didn't invent "Hardball". I would have to say that this term was invented in Chicago. One might think that 'hardball' politics is negative - but if you look around the city - this style of politics - gets things done.

Though generally - people might object to this style of politics - bottom line in the end - the powers that be and their adversaries battle furiously - but ultimately come to a compromise - always in favor of the powers that be - and to the benefit to the people of Chicago.

This is my impression as a life long native of Chicago. I'm sure that their will be others on this board that live in Chicago that won't agree with me - and hate our current Mayor Daley.

But if you look around at this city - things get done - it looks wonderful - and it functions fairly good in comparison to other major cities in this country.

Currently - Mayor Daley is pushing for the 2016 Olympics to come to Chicago. There is a lot of dissension amongst some factions in the city. But my bet is that Mayor Daley and his coalition will persist and we will be host to the 2016 Olympics. And you know what - it will be the greatest thing to happen to this city.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Thanks, everyone who replied.

There are several themes mentioned and all sound familiar.
I do have some Rush-following relatives, but it's more than that. The slur element has it's appeal to many, unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. i recently moved from the city back to the suburb of my youth...
we had a two-flat in north park for 11 years, and although i think that daley in general is a corrupt p.o.s., the city does usually "work".

two of my pet peeves about richie's tenure- i didn't like the way the bus stop contract was handled and handed to the french company, and i think that meig's field should have remained in place.
and soldier field should have been done with a retractable dome/roof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
16. Everyone votes dem. Doesn't mean the politicians are liberal.
Mayor Daley gets in with huge votes. Several times a year there are front page stories of corruption from his administration. People still love him. Precinct captains at the polls in many neighborhoods still hand out card telling everyone how to vote. They live in the neighborhoods. City council will do just about anything the mayor says, including selling the streets to a private corporation for 100 years so they can charge how much they want for street parking. Chicago school are mostly terrible, especially in the lower income areas. Many of us liberals here are very upset that President Obama chose Arne Duncan to reform education. (He didn't do much here).

I do believe the city has had some racial healing in the past few decades. Mayor Washington had a very tough battle and did a wonderful job as mayor. I think a lot of people learned from that experience and became a little less fearful of people of color. He paved the way for President Obama.

There is a lot of ugliness in Chicago politics. I wish Texas politicians could be branded the same way. They are just as slimy and corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Pay to play", "I'll hire your kid, if you donate $$$ to my campaign".
"Don't send nobody that nobody sent!" Government service = a jobs program for the politically connected

You get the idea!

(and, yes, I have relatives who work for the City!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GTurck Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
23. People love...
shorthand pejoratives.
I grew up in Chicago during the first Daley era and now live in Central Texas. All my life I have heard nasty things said about both places which were mainly not true but the shorthand language used to denigrate each of them is the same: sleazy, stupid, corrupt, ignorant, untrustworthy, etc. It is shorthand that the birthers and the teabaggers and the town hall disrupters are using to roil things up. It is shorthand pejoratives that allows and sustains all conflicts. When we on this side find a way to deal with the other side without the shorthand pejoratives we may be able to start changing things.
In the meantime I loved Chicago for its museums, atmosphere, and great skyline and I love this part of Texas for the sane ordinary people with whom I disagree heartily but who would still give me the shirts off their backs and for the wild geography that surrounds and excites me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. exactly....can you see Frank Luntz's dirty influence behind this sort of thing:
socialism?

chicago style politics

government bureaucrats standing between you and your doctor?

it's all classic propaganda technique, designed to short circuit rational thought by evoking emotional responses, the more powerful the better, the more fear based (lizard brain), the more effective

the last thing they want is for anyone to think critically

why is NCLB so 'popular?' when all you do is teach for the test, all you get is a bunch of automatons, with the added fillip of hating the idea of actually learning for learning's sake

I work in a grade school, and the change in kids from K through 6 is very depressing. they start out so excited, so happy to discover new things every few minutes. that gets beaten out of them pretty quickly, and by the time they're 11, forget it.....for most of them, it's too late
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GTurck Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. I was a teacher's aide and Library Trustee...
before I retired and I have the same problems with NC LB as most other educators. I worked mostly with special ed kids and now they are being "main-streamed" so that the schools can displace their lower scores by averaging them in with the rest of the student population. My grandkids are getting all that they need to pass the TAKS (Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills) even though one of them is in the NHS. They are in the early process of being trained but not educated.
Will they grow up to be the next generation of Limbaugh/Beck/O'Reilly followers because they have no foundation in really thinking? Oh Lord I hope not. It is one reason I am active here and in my community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #43
46.  so nclb serves to reduce special ed funding, in effect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GTurck Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-08-09 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. I have no absolute evidence...
but that may be true. At any rate kids who work on a 3rd grade level but are 5th grade in age are but into the latter classroom and an aide is attached to them. Problem is that the aide also helps the teacher with the other children (fine by itself) but not really what helps the special ed child. Even children who have behavioral problems, which can be severe, are being mainstreamed. I think that only the autistic and developmentally delayed still have a special ed teacher with a special ed aide and a class limit of 5.
Does anyone on DU have more on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. Speaking as a Chicago Democrat its more about the strategy of the Chicago Way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. LOL, I just sent that on--waiting for the reaction.

Thanks. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. Heh, recipient just said "well, that's more extreme than I meant."
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
36. seems a little late for that "argument"
they just don't really have anything but smears at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
37. "Chicago Politics" is what Republicans call it when they're losing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
42. I assume you are referring to something that has been included in the distraction
du jour, but "Chicago politics" means blatant, or open, corruption that has defined that city and the state of Illinois for generations. It has traditionally been the purview of the nominally Democratic Party, but it is all about the garnering and retention of power, rather than any political or moral belief system.

IOW, anything is "legal" so long as the right people are paid off.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
44. Do They Mean "The City That Works"
Keep in mind the rushpublicans haven't had a presence in Chicago since Big Bill Thompson in the 20's. Thus they have little clue on how things are done in Chicago...just stereotypes and talking points.

Yes, Chicago is a one party city with many tents inside that party. It's because this is a city that cherishes and celebrates diversity...the GOOP can't deal with anything but middle aged white man's rule.

I laugh at how they try to equate President Obama with the "Chicago Machine" that fell apart 25 years ago when Harold Washington was elected. But it fits into a bunch of right wing memes...fear of minorities, fear of the majority and fear of not having power. Thus they try to broad brush a political system they don't understand and one that's been highly efficient and effective.

The big irony is they'd love to have a machine that works...their machine is broken and out of gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
45. corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
47. Corruption: It's Only Wrong When Republicans Do It
And I don't see how you can have a "City that Works" with large urban war zones within its borders, public schools no sane parent will let their kid cross the threshold of, a police force that intimidates witnesses after one of their own beats up a female bartender half his size, and judges like the one who gave the cop in question 2 years probation for his crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
48. It means the government exists to give certain people money and power
Yes, government is very corrupt around Chicago. In Illinois there is no real competition between Ds and Rs - they all rely on the same powerbrokers. Government exists to give jobs to your political supporters. They "get out the vote" and work for the politicians at election time. So the politicians do not drive a hard bargain with the government employees at contract time - it means screwing over the people who count and produce votes. The negotiation process is therefore corrupted. But the real graft is in white-collar patronage - where you have to use certain insurance brokers (run by a politicians wife, cousin, brother etc.) in order to get government contracts or even something silly like building permits. If you are a large organization one must hire a politicians wife, cousin, brother etc. at a little or no work job in order to keep the city and state grants coming. Or if not hire then outright, use their firms as consultants, accountants, etc. There is whole generations of princlings (children of politicians) who have rainmaker jobs at law firms, banks, you name it who wine and dine their friends in government for about ten hours a week yet are made partners.

Yeah it works I suppose and the city is clean. Violent, but that is in the minority neighborhoods so nobody cares. The schools suck balls (except certain magnate schools who you have to know someone to get into). But taxes are high - corruption costs money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC