Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1984: Is this for REAL? $668MM to Install Thot Police in UK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:42 AM
Original message
1984: Is this for REAL? $668MM to Install Thot Police in UK
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:46 AM by snot
"£400 million ($668 million) will be spent on installing and monitoring CCTV cameras in the homes of private citizens. Why? To make sure the kids are doing their homework, going to bed early and eating their vegetables. The scheme has, astonishingly, already been running in 2,000 family homes. The government’s 'children’s secretary' Ed Balls is behind the plan, which is aimed at problem, antisocial families. The idea is that, if a child has a more stable home life, he or she will be less likely to stray into crime and drugs.

"'It gets worse. The government is also maintaining a private army, incredibly not called 'Thought Police', which will 'be sent round to carry out home checks,' according to the Sunday Express. And in a scheme which firmly cements the nation’s reputation as a 'nanny state', the kids and their families will be forced to sign 'behavior contracts' which will 'set out parents’ duties to ensure children behave and do their homework.'

"And remember, this is the left-wing government. The Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling, batting for the conservatives, thinks these plans are 'too little, and too late,' implying that even more obtrusive work needs to be done."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. A link would be nice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. This has been debunked somewhere
I can't be bothered to look for it, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. where's that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It was actually in the comments of your link.
http://twitter.com/edballsmp/status/3124025586

"the idea we are planning to put CCTV in families' homes is complete and total nonsense"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. The UK would be far better off putting all these people in prison..
Perhaps they might even manage to get their incarceration rate up to half that of the USA.

People in prison are far more free than people who have a camera in their home.

Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the freest of them all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC