Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC would never fire Imus, he is making too much money for them

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:37 AM
Original message
MSNBC would never fire Imus, he is making too much money for them
They are milking this for as much publicity as possible. Two week suspension, B.S.

Imus, Limbuagh, O'Reilly, and those pollutors of PUBLIC AIR WAVES that have spewed racist, sexist,and outrageous comments thrive, because public empowers them by listening to their filth

Corporations will continue to exploit this as long as the public participates in this charade

An amazing thing happened when the Democrats decided to boycott fox hosting the Democratic debates. It is a start.

Wouldn't it be something if Democrats refused to appear on fox at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Imus needs to clean up his act.
He needs to have his mouth washed out with Lifeboy soap, just like little Ralphie did on A Christmas Story.

And how about a hair cut? Imus looks like hell with that Rat's nest on his head.

Ugly outside and ugly inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think the PUBLIC need to clean up THEIR act, and don't watch or listen to the crap /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. In a nation of 300 million people, nobody can tell me there isn't someone who could do the job ...
... better than Imus. I don't give a shit whether he "cleans up his act" or not ... he has no business being in broadcastng. The notion that he has some entitlement to continue is unadulterated horse shit - being peddled by those whose rice bowls are dipped in his gravy train.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. How about Glen Beck for his statements about Muslims
How about O'Reilly or limbaugh for their racist and sexist comments?

What if people didn't listen to them, what would happen?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. When discussing Imus, Beck is irrelevant.
It's like kids saying "but Sally did it too!" Irrelevant. Separate topic.

We (particularly on DU) have recognized the corruption in the media of a long time. That's not the issue. The issue is the "opportunity" to clean up a small corner of it. Just like a dirty living room carpet is no reason for not vacuuming the bedroom, Glen Beck's (unarguable) bigotry is not relevant to dealing with Imus.

Yes, the media is overrun with corruption in service to the wealthy and keeping the "lower 90%" divided, distracted, and delusional.

Yes, Glen Beck is a hate-monger and bigot. So are many Faux Noise anchors.

That's a different subject.


Insofar as listening, I have Faux Noise blocked and have NEVER watched Glen Beck past the first time when it was clear he was a bigot. I have not watched or listened to Imus in over a decade ... and have no use whatsoever for people who use (derision of) other human beings as a means for their own ends.

I've said this several times before on DU and it bears repeating: It is fundamentally immoral to treat human beings as a means to an end rather than an end in themselves. This, I believe, is at the root of our major societal corruptions today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I couldn't agree with you more. Incidently, but bringing up beck or others isn't irrelevent
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 11:51 AM by still_one
it is all related to corporate profits or what is right

MSNBC is allowing imus to broadcast for three more days before suspending him. Is this a joke or what?

Unless the public TAKES back the public air wave nothing will happen. Bringing back standards, the fairness doctrine, and stopping the corporate monopolies of the media will turn it around.

The Democratic candidates are boycotting the fox hosted debates, and THAT IS SIGNIFICANT

If just the Democrats in this country stopped watching imus or the others it would have an impact

Incidently, I don't watch or listen to any of them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stirlingsliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Exactly.
$$$Money Talk$

And, as long as Imus is generating MONEY for MSNBC and the other corporate masters, he will be untouchable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. People on DU have really surprised me Yes, there is a lot of
Edited on Tue Apr-10-07 10:49 AM by higher class
money involved.

If you enter IMUS BIGOTRY and 1997 or any other year in a search engine - you will see all kinds of articles about past occurences of bigotry - MSNBC and CBS have gotten away with this for years.

What money is involved.

NBC is the facilitator of the Republican agenda.
In addition to stopping the votes of people like these girls, they get to smear these people over a period of 20 hours every week.

Do you know how much money he and his wife are going to lose by not having that outlet for selling all their products that they pitch on that showh while GE Microsoft NBC McQuirk Imus and all their executives smear minorities?

THis is serious stuff - it's about letting it all go by the wayside again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. They won't fire him because he was doing his job.

Sure he went too far in his zeal, but he is the archie bunber of morning talk radio/tv. That's his schtick.

I understand why people are mad and insulted, but that's his thing and people like to listen to it. He's not a monster, he's just an average curmudgeon with the typical white guy biases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe we need to charge up MSNBC's replacement for him
for the next two weeks. Give the relacement more attention and viewership, positive feedback, etc. Maybe then MSNBC will reconsider bringing the Imus the Insensitive Idiot back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. He's on in the middle of the night/early morning
and who watches a radio show on TV? It's like listening to a painting.

He makes SOME money, cuz it probably costs them $4.35/hour to broadcast, but I doubt it's a big moneymaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC