Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bachmann on list of "most vulnerable" Republicans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 01:32 PM
Original message
Bachmann on list of "most vulnerable" Republicans
This one's from Roll Call:

The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) on Thursday will name 15 more Members to its “Patriot” program to boost the party’s most vulnerable incumbents in 2010, bringing its membership to 25...

According to a list obtained by Roll Call, the 15 new Members named to the program are: Mike Rogers (Ala.), Mary Bono Mack (Calif.), Bill Posey (Fla.), Tom Rooney (Fla.), Mario Diaz-Balart (Fla.), Lynn Jenkins (Kan.), John Fleming (La.), Bill Cassidy (La.), Michele Bachmann (Minn.), Blaine Luetkemeyer (Mo.), Lee Terry (Neb.), Scott Garrett (N.J.), Dean Heller (Nev.), Charlie Dent (Pa.) and Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.).


I don't know about the other legsilators, but it's kind of amazing that after nearly two terms in office--Michele's *still* on the list of the most vulnerable Republicans.

Do you remember a million years ago, when Republicans and conservatives tirelessly argued for term limits on the grounds that incumbents have an unfair and overwhelming advantage? And that should be especially true for Michele Bachmann, a Republican conservative running in what is perhaps the most conservative district in Minnesota. In theory, she should be practically invulnerable. Her district, as currently drawn, has never been won by a Democrat and the voting demographic heavily favors Republican conservative candidates.

So why is Michele chronically on the critical list, begging for more help and more money when--in terms of voter demographics--she should have one of the safest Republican seats in the country?

Well, she's probably chronically vulnerable because:
1. --after ten years in government, she hasn't delivered any major legislative victories for conservative supporters, or anyone else. (She hasn't repealed any legislation that conservatives find obnoxious, and she hasn't created any legislation that would build popular support for her in her district.)
2. --up til now, she's made a big deal out of not seeking earmark spending for her district. Earmark spending (on important, necessary projects) is an important way of shoring up the local economy during economic times of trouble--not only does it keep infrastructure in repair, it can provide jobs and stimulate the district's economy when the private sector's in a slump.
3. --and the private sector *is* in a slump in Michele's Sixth District. Last time we checked, the Sixth had the highest home foreclosure rate in the state. Michele hasn't done anything to change that awful statistic.
4. --and she abandoned her much-touted, much publicized pledge not to seek or accept earmark spending for the district. That can't please conservatives who really do think earmark spending is a pernicious waste of tax dollars. And it can't please the other voters and families in the district, because that means that Michele passed up a lot of needed earmark money for the district all along--just so she could do as much conservative grandstanding as possible.
5.--and Michele has developed a national reputation as perhaps the foremost nut in American government--a publicity junkie more notorious for what she says, than anything she's done for the voters and families in her district.

So there's at least five reasons why a conservative Republican legislator is chronically vulnerable when it comes to keeping a seat in a conservative Republican district. Perhaps you can think of other reasons.
http://dumpbachmann.blogspot.com/2009/07/bachmann-on-list-of-most-vulnerable.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good to hear. She has cornered the market on "the stoopid."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Just wait until Tarryl Clark lays into her.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think she'll win in 2010.
In 2012, Minnesota may have 7 Congressional districts instead of the 8 we currently have, and in that case any incumbent MN Congressperson may be at risk then depending on how the districts are drawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. A chance to take her down sooner rather than later is worth the effort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's got more holes in her head than Swiss cheese
and is way behind the shelf life of stoopid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's been mighty quiet lately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's her only winning strategy.
She makes a fool of herself every time she opens her mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. actually her latest census non sense may well be a stake through her heart
Minnesota may well lose a Congressional seat in 2012 thanks to her getting conservatives not to fill out census forms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. Voters in her district will have to find the strength to accept the fact
Edited on Sun Jul-26-09 03:59 PM by saltpoint
that once aliens capture a Congresswoman and make extensive and malevolent adjustments inside her cranium, the resulting personality simply is not going to be the same.

Perhaps counseling centers could be set up through Bachmann's Minnesota district to help her constituents cope.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC