|
Edited on Mon Apr-09-07 05:49 PM by scarletwoman
I live about 100 miles from the major metropolitan area where the broadcast channels originate.
All you need for a rooftop antenna to work is one person on the roof adjusting it, one person in the house with the TV yelling out an open window, and one person standing outside the open window who can yell up to the person on the roof: "Turn it some more!" "Wait! Move it back a little!" "Hold it!" "Never mind, turn it some more!" "No! -- Yes! -- THERE!" "Oops! Sorry! Move it back!" "No no no! Back the OTHER way!"
Yeah, it takes a bit of family togetherness to get it pointed in the right direction, but once you hit it, you're set.
Anyway, there's no way I'm ever going to shell out my hard-earned money for 200+ channels of crap I wouldn't even bother watching for free. What few programs that might pique my interest seem to be exhaustively commented on right here on DU -- as well as numerous blogs -- so I really don't feel like I'm missing anything. And if something seems really worth following up on, there are usually transcripts eventually available.
I don't watch online video, either -- my dialup modem and antique computer can't handle it. Even so, between DU and all the many other online resources available, I don't feel like I'm missing anything. I think I'm plenty well-informed.
As for election coverage -- yes, the broadcast networks provide all night coverage for major elections. But why be tied to talking heads for election returns? For the 2006 election coverage, I mostly relied on online resources to keep up with vote totals -- often getting results faster than what the TV was showing.
Life without cable works just fine for me.
sw
|