Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tax Rates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:06 PM
Original message
Tax Rates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bumbum Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. The problem is that the high tax rates never got assessed on anywhere near the real income
People hid income all the time. Virtually nobody paid the top tax rate; they hid their income. Bringing down the tax rate brought the money out of the shadows and America was able to tax it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Only partly true.
Most of the money that "came out of the shadows" will never be taxed anyway - it just gets passed from one generation to the next. The money that gets taxed is only the dividends of that - and only part of that will ever be taxed because of a gazillion loopholes.

They slash the tax rates on the uppermost 5%, cut services to the bone and raise taxes for the other 95% to do it. We are told we have to cut cut cut taxes and services to save the economy --- well I'd like to know WHO'S economy are we saving? Because I have news for you tax slashing advocates -- every damn time you folks slashed taxes MY economy got WORSE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinb1212 Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's not hiding.
In our history, we've had very high tax rates for the very rich. But.....we have also had deductions and write offs available that made sure almost no one paid taxes at that top rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. That was until they dropped the top marginal tax rates from over 90% to just over 70%...
When Kennedy cleaned up a lot of those deductions. Top marginal tax rates were STILL over double what they are now!

Hmm... We have a number of posters with low post counts on this thread. Sense we have some "infiltrators" here! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. The rich paid a lot of money to accountants, investment advisors and tax lawyers
To find all those loopholes. In the end, all the money they paid to avoid taxes amounted to a large percentage of how much they would have had to actually pay the taxes without the shenanigans. What it did do was create an industry of deception in financial investment that had to find another way to survive once the tax rates went down.

So when was it that all the private retirement funds get started? Weren't most of them created about the same time the tax rates for the upper incomes slashed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Very well put. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. they didn't "hide" money so much as "shelter" it
the government carved out many ways for rich people to put their money to work in ways deemed to be a good idea by the government, and for this they were rewarded with huge deductions and credits to lower their taxes.

these were "loopholes" or "managing the economy through the tax code" depending on your perspective.

in lowering the rates and reducing these provisions, they cut out a lot of unproductive loopholes, but they also lost the ability to manage (and stabilize) the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. That's why we need to INVADE THE CAYMANS
It's a war I can get behind. It will take 45 seconds, a few satellites, and thousands of software specialists.


There will be no deaths.




Then we will move on to Switzerland etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. As a scuba diver, I'd volunteer to be part of the occupation forces.
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. I suspect that higher top marginal rates also produce a more steady economy.
Bubble economies really didn't become nearly as frequent until we started slashing the rates the rich pay.

Rich bastards will gamble with huge excesses of income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumbum Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "rich bastards" Who is that? Anybody with a car, job, and a home? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. See Goldman Sachs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumbum Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So rich bastards are people with a job, TWO cars, and TWO houses. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. LOL.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 09:37 PM by Mojambo
If you think those guys only have two houses you're crazy.

Hell, McCain had like 7 and he's a pauper compared to those cats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumbum Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. So you want to take everything away from those undeserving "rich bastards", eh? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yep.I'm a big mean scary socialist!
Booga Booga!

Chump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Yeah, sure.
A job paying a million+ a year, two $100K+ cars and two 20000 SQFT homes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Peddle the pseudo-libertarian talking points elsewhere, please. Income over $350,000/year ...
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 09:40 PM by TahitiNut
... is HARDLY such a "middle class" caricature. It's less than 1% of taxpayers ... and may have annual incomes in six figures. Further, that top rate ONLY applies to the income in EXCESS of $350,000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumbum Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Ya, how dare they actually make a very fine income in this grand country where you can. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Are you under some impression that 40%=100%? Are you under the impression that a "tax" is a "fine"?
If so, you're an imbecile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumbum Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. If I were an imbecile I would be whining about what other people make. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. If you see "whining," you're an imbecile.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Nice paraphrase. Wanna know where that came from?
The Grandaddy of Dereg himself, Phil Gramm. One of your heroes that got us balls deep into this mess.

History, once again, is not on the side of your sad-ass theories or talking points. Is it any wonder Republicans and Libertarians are almost always fiscally comfortable males with a not-so-slightly prejudicial and judgemental bend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. (Shoot. I missed it.)
:shrug: It went >poof< before I got back. (If only its origin would, as well.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. "This board is full of WHINERS!"
. . . or something to that effect.

Our mods = awesome. They've had to clean a lot of bad rubbish up as of late, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. You might try...
a Republican web site. After all, they never whine there, do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Pizza delivered.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. It IS a great country. So don't be a fucking freeloader.
Libertarians are such fucking freeloaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Grand country where money rules and the working class is their ATM recipient.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 09:48 PM by HughBeaumont
It's called paying your fair share, something the wealthy haven't done in three decades. All you need to do is look where that hoarding and low taxation led us: the worst 10 year stretch of private sector job creation in 75 years. History is not on the side of your bullshit Friedmanite/Randist theories.

Don't you have a Glenn Beck Show taping to try and get tickets for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Grand countries need roads, police, educated & healthy workers, etc.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 10:13 PM by Oregone
Their ability to pay taxes and remain viable as a class (incredibly viable, mind you) shows that they greatly benefit from the entire social structure compared to what they contribute. Take away the roads, police, and sane working/consumer class, and you have chaos. Their VISA is as valuable on wallstreet as it would be on the streets of Mogidishu. The entire environment and stable marketplace they need to be rich and continue in that direction is dependent on their tax contribution. They get their money worth, time and time again. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Hey, check out my signature...
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 10:07 PM by Wednesdays
On edit...I smell pepperoni and green pepper baking in the oven. Yum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC