Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Photos of Michael Jackson Show Signs of Vitiligo and Needle Punctures

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:26 AM
Original message
Photos of Michael Jackson Show Signs of Vitiligo and Needle Punctures
Exclusive photos of Michael Jackson obtained by ABC News show a serious wound on the pop star's right leg, which a medical expert said appears to be surrounded by unusual needle punctures.

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/MichaelJackson/Story?id=8083809&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. There were also reports of skin cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I didn't hear about that
thanks for the heads up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. My God, he told the truth about the Vitiligo.
And nobody believed him. Why he looked "bleached" is explained below (and I have read other articles that have said the same thing):

Jackson's Ailment: Expert Says Photos Show Vitiligo

Jaliman said the photos show a loss of pigmentation consistent with vitiligo, a chronic disorder that causes depigmentation in patches of skin.

"From looking at the photographs, it looks like Michael Jackson does have vitiligo," Jaliman said, pointing to the uneven discoloration of his skin.

...

"When people have vitiligo and they have such uneven discoloration, oftentimes they take a dipigmenting agent, which is a cream, and you can actually destroy the very dark color cells that you have and then you make your skin very, very white," Jaliman said.

"If you look at his hands, they are totally depigmented. And in vitiligo, you would never see that. So I would start to think that he might have used a depigmenting agent," she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:22 PM
Original message
I always believed him.
Why would he make something like that up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
85. So did I
I guess some people just wanted to believe he "wanted to be white" and bleached his skin for the hell of it. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
65. I've seen vitiligo in my own family so I never doubted it, but I thought he probably bleached the
rest of his skin to even it out. I can't say I wouldn't do the same thing. I can't say that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingTimeHere Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
93. I always believed he had vitiligo. I just don't understand all the surgeries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Proof of Vitiligo.
Maybe those people who kept saying MJ was trying to become white can shut up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I always believed he had vitiligo. (of course everyone will say that now, I suppose)
Unlike some crybabies, Jackson never tried to counter the ridicule he endured from the public, talk show hosts, and media about his "wanting to be White", which says something about his strength of character.

Hope all of the bigots are happy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Once it came out that he had vitiligo, I believed it.
I have seen African Americans with that disease and if it were me, I would definitely try anything to cover it up. Because the patches make you look like you are disfigured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobinA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
43. Never Doubted It For a Minute
I've seen a two AAs with vitiligo (that I could tell) and it looks quite bad. I can certainly understand why ANYBODY would want to hide it, particularly someone who makes money from his looks. It never made a bit of sense to me that he wanted to bleach himself because he hated being black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Other that the obvious plastic surgery - I don't believe a thing that anyone has told me about him
Sure, he was an "odd ball" but IMHO - very little else.

I don't think he was a pedophile. I think he definitely had that skin condition.

And there you have it. The only freaks in the Michael Jackson saga were the people he was surrounded by... and then there's the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
53. and
the nattering nabobs of negativism on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #53
64. No doubt!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. check this out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. No proof of vitiligo---
Sorry, but a skin doctor looking at picture can't diagnose that. She's not his doctor, and she hasn't seen the body, nor the autopsy report.

It's looks consistent with IV drug use, too....their skin gets mottled, too.

Remember Dr. Frist?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. why don't you try looking at the links above
Dr. Welby?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. I looked at them--the dr in question looked at pictures
from 2002.

That's a Dr. Frist diagnosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
66. Waddaya call this? BTW, the mottled skin of a white guy like Frist is NOT the same thing, At all.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #66
73. goes to show he didn't bother to look at the links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #73
80. But he's not a doctor but he just knows it's "mottled skin" from drug use
which is the dumbest thing anyone with even common knowledge of skin conditions could come up with after viewing the pictures.

Besides, the premise that photographs are not sufficient to observe and make speculation about disease is just DAFFY. What the hell do people think physicians and nurses learn from? Do they think they trot in a person with leprosy to show us what leprosy looks like? How about cutaneous anthrax? Google that one for a real horror story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
59. Vitligo isn't going to explain why he changed his facial features.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. We will never know why he changed his facial features.
But since his face would be white as a sheet, he probably thought his African American features would stand out more. Maybe he didn't want to look like an Albino. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
p4poetic Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #59
90. well
"Vitligo isn't going to explain why he changed his facial features."

I don't understand that proposition. He got plastic surgery on his nose before he was diagnosed vitiligo/discoid lupus. His first nose job was in fact in the late 70s after breaking his nose on stage (it was probably the Triumph tour, but I'm not sure). Besides, his sister Janet has similarly reshaped her nose (albeit not as much, I don't think their father made fun of any of his children's noses as much as he did Michael's).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #90
98. Janet didn't " similarly reshape her nose."
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 09:20 AM by LisaL
I don't think there was much of a nose left after all the things MJ did to his.
Janet's nose looks similar to what she started off with as a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. I saw part of that interview with the male parental unit last night.
x(

That ex-assistant or whomever said he had got up to go the bathroom, forgetting there was an IV in his leg, and it ripped out of his skin. (showed the pic)

Just my impression but the father came across like a snake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
83. Which leads to the question
WTF did they start an IV in his LEG??????? And who started it? What was wrong with the veins in his arms at the time? At the time the explanation given was "it's a wound from a spider bite".
I've seen IV's get pulled out by patients moving around too quickly. I've never seen a wound like that afterwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. This Would Explain a Lot
"Everybody tryin' to make a big thing out of it ... They say -- 'He try to paint his self white.' That's not true. Michael got vitiligo," Joe Jackson said. "We saw it comin' on him and -- at -- early age. You know, just a little spot. My aunt had the same thing. It's no cure for that ... He did not try to paint himself white."

But Jaliman said that from the photos, it appears that Jackson used a depigmentating agent on certain parts of his body to even out his skin tone.

"When people have vitiligo and they have such uneven discoloration, oftentimes they take a dipigmenting agent, which is a cream, and you can actually destroy the very dark color cells that you have and then you make your skin very, very white," Jaliman said.

"If you look at his hands, they are totally depigmented. And in vitiligo, you would never see that. So I would start to think that he might have used a depigmenting agent," she said.

Thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. He was just trying to get his skin to match. Can you imagine the pain of his open sore?
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
67. His dermatologist was saying as much on Larrry King Live.
He said MJ was very spotted and that he prescribed him with a depigmentation cream to even the skin pigment out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. What a horrible sight.
Mottled legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kjackson227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Mottled, and very, very thin. So sad :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. I also meant to say how sad.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. I saw a guy with vitiligo the other night in the grocery store.
I've seen people with it all my life. I recall as a child, that some folks believed that black people were soaking in bleach. But I haven't seen it too often lately. Then I saw a guy the other night, who had the most whited area I have ever seen. The remaining brown skin was more like a birth mark on his face than a remnant of his former complexion.

I tried to observe without getting caught staring. Something I noticed was that his hair was also straight and fine and didn't appear to have been chemically processed, it wasn't stiff like straightened hair, it was actually caucasian looking despite his pronounced facial features.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobinA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
44. "Uneven Pigmentation"
is putting in mildly with African-American people and vitiligo. I remeber that nonsense about soaking in bleach from when I was a kid. I didn't believe it then anymore than I do today. I may be white already, but touching bleach never whitened my sick a bit, or I would have used it on my freckles starting in about 4th grade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I just remember it through a child's eyes.
I only remember it on women, because the only skin I would see on black men was face and hands. I remember seeing black women with what looked like horribly irritated patches or burns on their legs so the bleaching thing made sense to me. Naturally, I was forbidden to mess with bleach (and had no desire to) but I did try to bleach my hair once at about age 9. I put peroxide on my hair and sat in the sun. SInce I didn't wash the peroxide off my hands, little dots of peeling skin formed, and I thought I had leprosy. I was terrified of leprosy as a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
68. Hispanics and "white" people get it too. My FIL had naturally straight hair and vitiligo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. What happened to privacy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Ah, the irony....defending MJ apparently requires his autopsy photos. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Those pictures of his legs were from 2002 - maybe from the court case.
As mentioned in the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. Well, that makes it okay, right?
I mean, personal medico-legal pictures submitted as part of a court case aren't private, right?

They should be gawked at and we should use them to make diagnoses from, right?

Look, I don't doubt the man did exactly what he was accused of--but I am disgusted beyond belief that this was used to diagnose a disease, or, in fact, were released.

MJ had a right to privacy about these pictures--beyond the fact-finders in his case, and the appropriate court personnel, who needed to see these?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. My response to you was to simply correct your impression that they were autopsy photos.
If they were part of the court case records it makes them public. I agree that the use of the pictures is reprehensible and teh 'experts' making diagnoses from them are full of bull.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. I appreciate your reply. However, just because they are part
of a court case does not mean they are 'public'. (See, torture photos.)

Again, I want to thank you for your reply. Although I think Jackson did what he was accused of, I think it sick to publish photos of his body.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #39
69. Not autopsy, not legal photos either. Look for yourself.



Well?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Call me a tinfoiler but how do we know that's MJ?
:shrug: If the pics only show from the knees down ... or did I miss something? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
51. On the ABC TV special
Edited on Wed Jul-15-09 05:20 PM by Raine
they showed Michael sitting there, in this article they only show the legs ... it's MJ.

edit:typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #51
96. Yeah, I caught that later in the evening -- thanks for the clarification!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
71. see for yourself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. I have vitiligo. Started as very small spots when I was a kid.
Then when I was about 35 it started on the tips of my fingers and has progressed on my hands so that all my fingers are now white. I have other larger spots on my legs and arms which are covered most of the time by clothing. I stay out of the sun as much as possible because when I tan my normal skin color
darkens and causes more contrast with the skin that's lost pigmentation.

A year or so ago it started on my face--which I was dreading. I now use sunscreen whenever I go out, wear
a hat and if I do get some sun, I use concealer to blend the spots with the rest of my face. So far, it's not too bad on my face.

It can be very disfiguring. As long as I stay out of the sun and don't tan, it's not that noticeable.
During the winter, it's much less noticeable on my hands--to the point that when I walk or go outside I often don't bother to put on sunscreen.

I'm Caucasian so the contrast on me is a lot less than on people who have normally darker skin tones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. My niece has it. She uses something that brings pigment from surrounding
skin to the areas where there isn't any pigment. I don't know how long that works. I guess once it gets really bad there isn't much surrounding pigmented skin to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I haven't seen a dermatologist about it for some time. My hands
and spots on legs/arms don't bother me, but I'm not happy it's started on my face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Yeah. That's where hers started. You might ask about that cream
next time you go to the doctor. I'll try to find out the name of it in the meantime. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
70. I have it too, but just got it in the past several years.
I was diagnosed with hypothyroidism several years ago so I'm assuming this is the cause. It is thanks to all of the discussion about MJ that I finally figured out what was going on. My entire throat, part of the top of one foot and part of my hand no longer tan.

I'm paper white anyway so it is not very noticeable unless I spend a lot of time in the sun. Luckily we have the option to avoid tanning. I can't imagine what it must be like to deal with for someone who is black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. My grandfather had vitiligo
and since he was white, I guess, decided not to mask it. But his face looked very strange, especially in the summer, when the non-effected areas tanned. And in the winter, the places on his face looked dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. Vitiligo? Or the mottled skin consistent with IV drug use?
Please--this dermatologist is diagnosing by picture....and did not say that it was positively vitiligo, merely, consistent with it.

Which should carry the same weight of Dr. Frist's diagnoses....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. you've really got an axe to grind, don't you?
do a little googling and you will find dozens of photos clearly showing his Vitiligo throughout his life.
but something tells me that the facts have very little bearing on your decision making process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. Welcome to DU.
Edited on Wed Jul-15-09 03:49 PM by msanthrope
Outside of a doctor who treated Jackson, or an autopsy report by a doctor detailing his condition, I apply the Dr. Frist rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. except to your own mottled skin/junkie pet theory
Dr. Frist would be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. I'm not a Dr. Nor have I slept at a Holiday Inn.
I get to speculate. Not diagnose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
75. AWESOME RESPONSE! And welcome to DU!
That completely rawked.

:toast:
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
:yourock:
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #48
62. Does that apply to court cases too, or just medical cases...?
"I apply the Dr. Frist rules."

Does that apply to court cases and indictments too, or just medical cases...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #62
91. Bam!!! You shot that dead!
LOL Thanks for doing that. I love it when asses get their asses handed to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #48
76. why go to such extremes when all you need to rely on are your eyes?
that's such a fucked up, illogical excuse not to face the truth and reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
74. His doctor was on Larry King Live the other night and
said that yes, in fact, he had vitiligo and described the condition of his legs exactly as they appear in the picture. He said he prescribed a cream to even out the color.

I'm not really sure why this is so hard to believe. I have vitiligo and several other posters have discussed that they have the same condition. It's not like it's extremely rare. MJ had Lupus, which is an autoimmune disorder (his doctor also said this). Vitiligo is very common with people who have such disorders.

Occam Razor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #74
81. Apparently he had two choices...darken the lighter spots or lighten the rest of his skin
Darkening the light spots would require heavy makeup all the time and there was a chance that the darkened spots would not all be the same shade when they were darkened. Plus I believe they said that eventually there would be too many spots to try and darken and cosmetically it would have been a nightmare.
So it was "easier" to just lighten his entire skin.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. jesus, that's a terrible wound
if that's MJ or someone else, that wound is scary as hell

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. IV drug use can make that kind of wound....looks like it's a junkie's
abscess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. Is this from the autopsy report? Or from someone who just
looked at some of the pictures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Agreed, we should wait for definitive proof. But given that without any proof at all,
people said MJ "wanted to be white", I see no problem taking a look and speculating.

In a larger sense, though, it probably is best to get something REAL instead of the constant flimsy barage of "news" about the deceased singer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Especially from ABC news, IMHO--you can't diagnose someone
from their autopsy photos...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #25
103. Except the fact that you are wrong as hell, and they're no autopsy photos.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 10:07 AM by Maru Kitteh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IcyPeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. These pix are from 2002 - it says it twice in the article!!
... not autopsy photos!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. You are right--but they are still pictures. And I ask you
should ANY doctor diagnose from pictures?

Who released these pictures?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #41
104. For the love of Dog, just admit you were wrong - and the short answer is yes and look it up yourself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
49. Michael had a spider bite at that time ...
I remember it being reported in the news. The media is letting every money grubbing liar in the books come on these shows to tell their lies and a lot of this stuff is being contradicted and its none of their damned business they are some of the people who made his life so miserable at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. Sad he had to die for people to figure some of these things out...
Pity people still believe he fondled and molested children. Especially when he comes across more sincere than 99% of politicians do when they are put in front of a camera to talk...

I should find the link when I went all-out defending the guy after he died...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Oh come on...
Edited on Wed Jul-15-09 01:58 PM by trumad
The dude admitted having boys sleep in his own bed with him..... Now I have no proof that he had sex with them--- but if you don't think that weird---then you're fucking weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Oh that's weird all right - too bad he probably never laid a finger on them.
That would have been really weird.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. or a Glove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. or a glove! Say? Let's dig him up and kill him again!!!
:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #36
94. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #94
99. You're entitled to believe that - I think it's horseshit and monetary settlements do not = guilt.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 09:23 AM by devilgrrl
Have a nice day. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. If the media tells a lie long enough ...
and over and over again they will ultimately catch some simple minded people in their snares,like you..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. Yes, the media keeps repeating that Michael Jackson abused children - I think they're lying!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
79. Do you have the quote where he said he admitted he was in the bed with them
I can only remember him saying that they slept in the bed and he slept in a sleeping bag on the floor. I also remember that the child on the special who he was talking about was quite ill and that he was paying for all of his care. That he was giving him special attention because of his illness.

I don't recall him ever saying that he slept in his bed with him. He did say he shared his bed with he, clarifying that he let them sleep in his bed.

There was a reason that he was acquitted and it wasn't because he was a celebrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #79
100. MJ had said he slept in the bed with many children during the
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 09:50 AM by LisaL
Bashir interview.
‘‘I have slept in a bed with many children. I slept in a bed with all of them when (Home Alone child star) Macaulay Culkin was little. Kieran Culkin would sleep on this side, Macaulay Culkin was on this side, his sisters in there. We all would just jam in the bed.’’
http://www.indianexpress.com/oldStory/17827/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #100
101. So that means they were all naked and he couldn't keep his hands off of them - right?
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 09:48 AM by devilgrrl
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #101
102. Poster asked for a quote and it was provided.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 09:58 AM by LisaL
It's your prerogative as to how to interpret the quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
54. The video of MJ's burn incident while filming a Pepsi commercial
in 1984 is up now. Its really a serious burn- it seems to me like they downplayed it quite a bit.

http://www.usmagazine.com/news/video-michael-jacksons-tragic-commercial-accident-2009157
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. I think so too.
Didn't realize it was that bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #54
82. I can't believe his whole head/face/clothes didn't catch on fire
2nd and ***3rd** degree burns he got from that. Very sad to hear the talking heads going thru the "what if" stuff. That moment on video is what set off his addiction to rx drugs. If only the pyro stuff had not gone off before he went down those steps....
Pepsi tried to shift the blame to him at the time, saying that the hair gel he used should not have been around the "flames" of the pyro part of the show. OK...well, HE didn't put his hair around flames, Pepsi's damn flames went off TOO SOON, before he could get down the steps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #82
87. Many hair products make your hair more flammable.
I remember being told that in organic chemistry in college. They said do not use hairspray or gel the day of lab; keep your hair in a ponytail for safety.

Michael shouldn't be blamed for using hair gel. They totally fucked up and took too long to get the fire put out.

For that kind of injury he surely needed serious pain medication. He's not the first person who became addicted to it after undergoing a major trauma, that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #54
84. I just watched that for the first time. WOW! Did they ever downplay that!
:wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #84
86. I can't believe they lit his head on fire
and he only got $1.5 million for it. A huge chunk of scalp burned right off his head- that must have been agonizingly painful. Not to mention that his hair probably never grew back. I just remember hearing there was an accident while shooting the commercial, but he was ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #84
89. No kidding.
Can you imagine that video and the true extent of his injuries being suppressed in this era? Even a mega corporation like Pepsi couldn't get away with it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
58. Lupus also causes these type of lesions
I know, my mother has it. She looks like a junkie too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. It's not Lupus. It's never Lupus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #60
72. Ah walk it off!
What do you say about a pedophile who is adored by this moralistic, victorian nation...

meh

I never watched a minute of the hype. effemall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #60
77. LOL.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #60
78. well
what is it, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingTimeHere Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #60
95. It's definitely never lupus on the show "House"
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
63. It looks just like a wound my mother had on her forearm...
compliments of a nurse who pulled a bandage off not so gently. A piece of flesh about 2x3 inches came off with it.

Took weeks to heal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
88. ABC "News" did more to destroy MJ than most with Bashir in tow...and now they continue
to feed off of him. That's why I avoid ABC for viewing. I lurch every time I see Bashir. The fact that he now hosts Nightline is a joke. I stopped watching the minute he took over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilmywoodNCparalegal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #88
92. Yeah, because Bashir forced MJ to admit to sleeping with
children in his own bed...

MJ was a flawed human being - talented, but flawed. Certainly, he was flawed as a result of his upbringing and the sycophants around him who probably enabled his drug abuse. I doubt that the Pepsi commercial incident alone is what started the downward spiral. His life was over the day he was born to his abuser-father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #92
97. They slept in his bed, he slept on the floor. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC