Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Lawyers Won’t Defend Ex-Bush Attorney(Yoo) in Torture-Memo Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:36 AM
Original message
U.S. Lawyers Won’t Defend Ex-Bush Attorney(Yoo) in Torture-Memo Case
Source: Bloomberg

July 14 (Bloomberg) -- Justice Department attorneys will no longer defend former Bush administration lawyer John Yoo, who wrote memos justifying harsh interrogations of suspected terrorists, in a lawsuit claiming he’s responsible for violating the constitutional rights of a detainee.

Private lawyers paid by the Justice Department will represent Yoo, who is appealing a federal judge’s refusal to throw out the lawsuit, according to court filings and a Justice Department spokeswoman. The filings didn’t name the lawyers.


“The department so far has been able to provide direct representation in this case by arguing that the lawsuit should be dismissed for qualified immunity reasons, and that remains the department’s position,” Tracy Schmaler, a Justice Department spokeswoman, said yesterday in an e-mail. “But as this case moves forward, the defendant deserves the opportunity to retain defense counsel that can make any and all arguments available on his behalf.”

Paying Yoo’s legal bills is “normal practice when the potential exists for disagreement between the government and the defendant over complex legal questions,” Schmaler said. Qualified immunity protects government officials from being sued for damages unless they violated clearly established law.

Jose Padilla, a detainee convicted last year of supporting terrorists and conspiring to commit murder, sued Yoo, who advised Bush that terrorism suspects weren’t protected by Geneva Convention bans on physical abuse.

more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=agK2D1ix4Amw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. no shit, taxpayer money should not defend traitorous criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We'll still be paying for it, but it won't be Federal Lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC