Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A war of colonial conquest in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 05:35 AM
Original message
A war of colonial conquest in Afghanistan
Some 4,000 marines, along with hundreds of British troops, are attempting to impose control over an ethnic Pashtun population that has opposed the US-led occupation ever since the 2001 invasion overthrew the Taliban government and installed a puppet regime.

At the same time, the Pakistani government...has ordered its military into a brutal offensive against the Pashtun people of northwest Pakistan. Their crime is that they share a common history, language and culture with the Pashtuns of Afghanistan and provide support to the Taliban insurgency over the ill-defined border between the two countries.

The human cost has already been staggering. In a savage act of collective punishment, the Pakistani military has forced at least 2.5 million people from their homes in tribal agencies such as Bajaur... The US is complementing the assault with almost daily airstrikes...

David Kilcullen, the former advisor to General David Petraeus, who helped plan both the Iraq and Afghanistan troop surges, told the British Independent this week what is being openly discussed in the White House and on Downing Street:

“We are looking at 10 years at least in Afghanistan, and that is the best case scenario and at least half of that will be pretty major combat. This is the commitment that is needed, and this is what the people in America and Britain should be told, and they should be told that there will be a cost involved.”

The main towns have already been placed under military rule. The movement of the population to markets, shops and hospitals will be controlled and monitored by curfews, checkpoints and constant searches and street interrogations. Local leaders will be pressured into identifying insurgents, who will then be targeted for assassination or capture by special forces’ death squads—whom the media dutifully call “armed reconnaissance patrols”.

The ostensible legal basis on which American troops are in Afghanistan is the “Authorization for Use of Military Force”, the joint resolution passed...one week after 9/11. The resolution authorised military force for the purpose of capturing or destroying the Al Qaeda leadership, beginning with bin Laden...

Nearly eight years later, there is barely the pretence that American troops are in Afghanistan to hunt down Al Qaeda. Instead, the war is declared to be against the “Taliban”—a label indiscriminately applied to any Afghan who resists the US-led occupation...

The dropping of the original pretext for the invasion poses the question: with what purported legal justification has the US government and its allies continued and escalated the war? The truth is they have none. Nothing remains but the reality of an imperialist war of plunder and domination...the occupation of Afghanistan provides the US and its NATO allies with a strategic forward base to project force against rival claimants for regional influence such as Russia, China, India and Iran.

The AfPak War is not a war against terrorism, or for democracy, or to help the long-suffering Afghan people. It is an indefinite, colonial war whose central aim is to turn Afghanistan into a US client state and ensure that Pakistan remains firmly under Washington’s geo-political influence.


http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jul2009/pers-j10.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. i see my fan club has been using the unrec button. cause god forbid we should ever
discuss the fucking 8 year & counting war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. yeah, I noticed that too
I'm sure we'll have a group of operatives running around unrec'ing everything that speaks poorly of this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Fuck them. k+r, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. I can see now that this unrc funtion just means a higher threshold
to get a post to the greatest. I saw a post this morning on healthcare that started 2 unrecs in the hole, as soon as it went up. Two people unrec'd it on the title alone. The same will happen with subjects like the War in Afghanistan and criticisms of President Obama and certain posters.

Some OP's will start in the hole, and have a higher threshold to make it to the GP. But, that doesn't mean they wont make it. In fact a thnk a number of DUers will automatically rec certain posts to help get over the moving threshold, moreso than before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. previous system once you passed the threshhold, you stayed there.
this system, not.

it's dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. humans are pretty stupid, and
the continued hostile occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan and soon-to-be Pakistan is a perfect example of just how stupid we really are. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Another one of my fans took away the rec; nice to be loved by so many.
We won WWII in 4 years, but supposedly we need to be in afghanistan (population 32 mill v US 300 mill) for over 10?

orwellian bullshit.

yes, we're stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. I like how the WSWS doesn't even try to hide that it is rooting for the Taliban.
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 06:42 AM by Kurska
You would be hard pressed to find more a more brutal gang of repressive fascists then the Taliban, but hey as long as they hate america they are cool with the WSWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. false. not surprising, happens a lot with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Oh come on.
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 06:51 AM by Kurska
It's basicly saying that we are waging a war of Imperial aggresion AGAINST the taliban, somehow making them out to be great anti-imperial freedom fighters. (Yes I read the article)

I'm tickled pink that those thugs are getting their ass kicked in Pakistan, I just wish we could get our act to together and slap them around as hard as Pakistan's army is.

P.S Taliban, The Chavez Admin, Iran's current regime, is there any gang of ruthless repressives that you won't support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. it's not saying anything like that. again, unsurprising that's your spin though.
thanks for the kick, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. "To suppress the resistance"
"To suppress the resistance, the Marine Corps is imposing a regime of “fear and intimidation” on the 250,000 inhabitants of the Helmand River Valley. The tactics being directed by General McChrystal are modelled on the counter-insurgency methods he applied in the rebellious areas of Iraq. The main towns have already been placed under military rule. The movement of the population to markets, shops and hospitals will be controlled and monitored by curfews, checkpoints and constant searches and street interrogations. Local leaders will be pressured into identifying insurgents, who will then be targeted for assassination or capture by special forces’ death squads—whom the media dutifully call “armed reconnaissance patrols”."

Is that how you see the Taliban, as the noble "Resistance" to the United state's imperialism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. except there's no capitalization in the wsws article as in your spin, & the referent of "resistance"
in the passage you quote isn't "taliban."

reading-impaired - or dishonest?

"as the New York Times acknowledged last week, the Taliban is gaining support due to hatred for the US and NATO occupiers and their puppet government in Kabul. On July 3, correspondent Carlotta Gall noted that “the mood of the Afghan people has tipped into a popular revolt in some parts of southern Afghanistan” and that people had “taken up arms against the foreign troops to protect their homes or in anger at losing relatives in airstrikes”.

To suppress the resistance, the Marine Corps is imposing a regime of “fear and intimidation” on the 250,000 inhabitants of the Helmand River Valley."


besides which, decrying invasion, occupation & terror isn't equivalent to "rooting for" the taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R for whatever that is worth
Excellent article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
and I'll keep kicking, the truth must be kept alive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. But..but..the politicians tell us that we're killing them for their own good. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R
Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. It would make for a good debate if those unreccing would explain why.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. We have to destroy them in order to save them.. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Visions of genocide.
Yeah, I'm thinking the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. "an imperialist war of plunder and domination"
Excellent article.

Thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
24. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
25. An upside is possible here. The Russian empire broke apart over Afghanistan. Maybe ours will too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
26. WSWS again?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC