Investigation: Nico Pitney critic Dana Milbank never wrote about press-conference plant Jeff Gannon

[Sweet and Spicy]

Media Matters' Eric Boehlert (6-25-09):Within hours of online writer Nico Pitney asking a single question at a WH presser, the WashPost's Milbank swooped into action, loudly mocking Pitney's involvement as being terribly troubling and phony. But please note that in 2005 when it was revealed that right-wing partisan James Guckert had been waved into the WH press room nearly 200 times without proper credentials, wrote under an alias (Jeff Gannon), and asked Bush officials softball questions, Milbank remained mum. (He wasn't alone.)

According to Nexis, Milbank never wrote about the Gannon story.But Pitney, the national editor for one of the most-read and widely respected online news outlets? His singular WH presence sent Milbank into an immediate tizzy.

http://www.mediamatters.org/blog/200906250013

Contact Milbank using this form: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/articles/dana+milbank/

[niyad]

1. obviously, milbank isn't doing nico.

[Catherine Vincent]

2. Guckert/Gannon's back in the news?

[AndreaCG]

3. This is a good reason why Olbermann no longer has Milbank on

He's a dumbass hypocrite.

(I hope I'm not mistaking Milbank with someone else who left Keith's show under a cloud.)

[RDANGELO]

4. Calling Gannon's questions softballs is an understatement.

They were ridiculously slanted.

[SemiCharmedQuark]

5. Milbank only likes Milbank's reporting.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=8494124&mesg_id=8494124

[Octafish]

6. Jeff Gannon might've opened a file of his own on Milbank.

Jeff's probably got a lot of files open on the powerful.

[glitch]

7. Dana Milbank - phooey. He belongs at Wapo. nt