Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gov. Sanford: Standard advice for going into the wilderness is to tell someone your plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:52 AM
Original message
Gov. Sanford: Standard advice for going into the wilderness is to tell someone your plans
Especially if you are going into the wilderness alone.

And wouldn't that include telling your family or someone in your family where you are going?

I find this odd for an average person, let alone for a governor.

Also, I'm pretty skeptical. I could see if you didn't want people to know where you were going, you might leave your staff in the dark (a bit much for governor though). But would you leave your own wife in the dark --she said she didn't know where Sanford was.

This just doesn't compute, unless there is another explanation for what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't Governors have a security detail?
I thought most states had state police protection for the Governors of at least one guard. I guess every state I lived in did.

You would think that if he did, they would have known about his plans????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. According to the local paper, he "slipped" his security detail.
Hmmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wildnerness doesn't compute. maybe to a designer cabin somewhere. Family uninformed suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flakey_foont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. very suspicious indeed
not too smart for the Governor of a state to decide to take a Crocodile Dundee walkabout on the spur of the moment, and not let someone with some authority know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. Makes you kind of wonder where he REALLY was and WHO he was
meeting with.

2012 is not THAT far away, when the campaigns start two years before election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't buy the story that no one knows where he is.
Edited on Tue Jun-23-09 11:21 AM by Catshrink
Wherever he went, rehab or camping or spa, someone knows. The denial is to keep the press at bay even though it makes the whole thing look very very odd. Why not just say that Gov. LooneyToons needed some time for R&R. Hmmmm, maybe not. That really sounds like rehab, doesn't it. Surely they could come up with a statement that would quell the speculation and satisfy the public's insatiable demand for "celebrity" news.

I think the more of an ass he makes of himself the better. This is just another example of how tone deaf the Republicans have become. Sanford is this week's loon, last week it was Ensign. Let's speculate on next week's "Republican Loon of the Week."

on edit: The week before Ensign, the loon was Palin -- but then, it's always Palin and someone else. So, in Loon of the Week "contest" Palin and Bachman are too obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. According to the Lt Gov he had no notion where Sanford was
and his staff couldn't or wouldn't tell him. One thing to leave your family or staff in the dark, but your second in command? That's skating right up to the illegal line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnrepentantUnitarian Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good "presidential material," isn't it?
We need that kind of "judgment" in the White House, don't we? No, in this case, it's "all about Mark." He has to follow his own whims and couldn't care less about his constituents or even his family. All about Mark...one of the most selfish politicians I've ever seen.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC