Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't get mad at Obama, blame the Conservadems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
steelmania75 Donating Member (836 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:49 PM
Original message
Don't get mad at Obama, blame the Conservadems
Obama can only do so much as the president. That is why we have a Congress that doesn't seem to want to get things done. If the healthcare bill fails because of the Conservadems, then they aren't Democrats, and need to be replaced by REAL Democrats and Progressives in the upcoming Senate Elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. FDR had the same problem... he solved it
he will have to start flexing that muscle... but we will have to hit the streets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Really? I read that FDR came into office with a "compliant congress"
who would have done whatever he said.

How did FDR flex his muscle to rein in his unruly congress, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. He was in office for a long time
And congress was with him on some issues and opposed to him on others - it seems like he always wanted to take a harder line on the Nazis but Isolationist Republicanoids preferred not to.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. We can't compare FDR after years to Obama five months in.
Congress's mood when FDR took office is the issue here I would think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Fair enough.
He did get a lot done in his first 100 days; I'm sure he had to do some finagling to do it, but Congress was pretty responsive to him in that period.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'm not sure what if any finagling he had to do.
That's why I asked.

I have read that when he took office he had a compliant congress who was willing to do whatever. Disastrous economic conditions likely helped to foster that environment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's all true enough.
But if they send him a shitty bill and he signs it, THEN it becomes his fault.

What he should do, preemptively, is tell them to not even bother sending him a bill without (at the very LEAST) a true public option.

And I sure hope to God he reads the bill they DO send him. And I mean, personally. Definitely not allow Rahm Emanuel and his "privatize Medicare" brother to screen it for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. I have been trying to point this out all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. You've got to understand that some people on DU really want to blame Obama no matter what
They know how our government works. They know that any kind of legislation must be passed by Congress first and subsequently signed by Obama. They don't care though.

The reason for the anti-Obama diatribes is to tear down Obama because they never really liked him anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Ding... Ding... Ding... BEST POST I've read all day.
With a little research it's clear that most of the "I'm so disappointed" posters have been disappointed since the primaries and, of those, most supported Kucinich. They'll never get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bullshit.
I supported Obama throughout the election.

Now he is going back on his word at every point.


If you want to blame Congress, go right ahead. I blame Obama for not speaking out in support of single payer. I blame Obama for not supporting LGBTQ rights. I blame Obama for not speaking out against government "secrecy" and indefinite imprisonment.


His administration is not living up to their side of the bargain.


If you want to call us all Obama haters, you are literally blind to reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Well Obama never promised to support single payer
and anybody who expected him not to be a centrist Clinton like democrat on healthcare was probably fooling itself.

That said I totally agree with the other two issues; he didn't have to file a brief in favor of DOMA and he certainly didn't need to shield the Bush Administration in the shameful way he has been.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Oh okay, so you AREN'T saying that it's unreasonable for us to be angry at the Obama admin.
You're just saying we are Obama haters and probably never liked him?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-24-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. No -I'm saying that if you are building a case against obama
Pick the stuff he's actually done that it's reasonable to be angry with him about. Where he's actually betrayed principles he claimed to be fighting for.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I don't think they know how government works.
Remember the DoJ brief brouhaha?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. That is crap. I like him a lot, and I reserve my right as a U.S. citizen
who voted for him to hold his feet to the fire when necessary. You are 100% wrong in that idiotic accusation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton whipped Democrats for NAFTA
Where is the Obama whipping operation? He needs to call out Conservadems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Was it Clinton or the money behind Clinton?
IMO it was the $$$$.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. It is widely report that Rahm had a whipping operation out of the West Wing for NAFTA n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'm sure it was the $$$ behind Rahm as well that was more influential
than either Clinton or Rahm themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. We have majority in the House and Senate and we have the Executive
and you are going to tell me if we don't get health care reform it's the fault of the lame duck Republicans? Good plan :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. No, Conservadems. It's right there in the subject line, even. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
konnichi wa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
13. Are you laboring under the misconception that Obama is a liberal?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-23-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Question
Other than the standard answer that "they are corporists," which ALL politicians are, what makes one a "Conservadem" and not a "REAL Dem?
Why someone like myself, an anti-war pro-choice pro-gay rights atheist, should go and vote Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC