http://mediamatters.org/blog/200906220002<snip>
But the Times article got worse as Bai tried to couch Coleman's unmatched delay efforts as part of a larger social and political trend, where people just can't admit defeat anymore:
What is new are the lengths to which losing candidates will now routinely go — and the money the parties will spend — to avoid their certain fates.
Problem is, Bai can't find a single other politician who has ever played the sore loser role as enthusiastically as Coleman. Bai did point to the Washington state governors race in 2004 and noted it "disputed for eight months." Technically, that's accurate. But Washington seated its governor in January, 2005, just two months after Election Day, whereas Minnesota is still waiting to seat its second senator, thanks to Coleman's stall tactics.
The other example Bai pointed to was " a special election for Congress in New York dragged on for more than three weeks amid legal arguments over what did and did not constitute a valid ballot." How exactly does a routine, three-week recount compare to Coleman's seven month-and-counting odyssey? Answer: It does not.
Meaning, Coleman's not part of any larger cultural trend where politicians can no longer concede defeat. Hundreds (thousands?) of them do it every election cycle in cities and states across the country. Coleman represents the radical exception, but the 'liberal media' are too timid to call him out on it.
---------------------