Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sully Takes A Time-Out To Assess Twitter Impact On The Media (re: Iran)...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 04:58 PM
Original message
Sully Takes A Time-Out To Assess Twitter Impact On The Media (re: Iran)...
Edited on Sun Jun-21-09 05:01 PM by BlooInBloo
He has of course been second-to-none on using Twitter to get the best-available information early on, all the while acknowledging that it is a *risky* source of information. Like many of us twitter users, he comes from a background of changing from "twitter is stupid", to "twitter can be invaluable or stupid, depending on the situation".

(Full disclosure: yours truly is another who went through a similar change of opinion, albeit mine was several months ago.)

Anyway, I think Sully nails it on what the *root* fundamental card that twitter brought to the table specifically in the case of Iran.

Short version: On twitter, we are all just internet users, and qua internet users, a lot of the real-life social/cultural/racial baggage doesn't make it into the intertubez. Upshot: empathy for the plight of the Iranians was immediate, massive and deep. And note that even *if* CNN hadn't turned into #CNNfail, they never could have brought that humanizing piece of the puzzle into the game. That phenomenon is intrinsic to people talking to people.

But enough babble; read the article.

http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/the_web/article6544276.ece

" The misspelling, the range of punctuation, the immediacy: it was like overhearing snatches of discourse from police radio. Or it was like reading a million little telegram messages being beamed out like an SOS to the world. Within seconds I could transcribe and broadcast them to hundreds of thousands more.

As I did so, it was impossible not to feel connected to the people on the streets, especially the younger generation, with their blogs and tweets and Facebook messages – all instantly familiar to westerners in a way that would have been unthinkable a decade or so ago. This new medium ripped the veil off “the other” and we began to see them as ourselves.

All the accumulated suspicion and fear and alienation from three decades of hostility between Iran and America seemed to slip away. Whatever happens, the ability of this new media to bring people together - to bring the entire world into this revolution on the streets of Iran - has already changed things dramatically.

...

The blogs also picked up the story sooner than much of the mainstream media because Iran has the third-largest number of bloggers in the world. In a police state theocracy, the internet became an alternative reality for the next generation of Iranians to live in. They are tech-savvy, western-oriented and always broadcasting. “One Person = One Broadcaster” was one tweet from the front line.

We simply became a hub for all this breaking information. This requires journalists getting out of the way of the story rather than attempting to put their own stamp on it and delivering their own version of the truth. I felt last week more like a DJ than a journalist, compiling and sampling and remixing the sounds, sights, events and words streaming out of an ever-shifting drama.

Of course, this model has serious limitations. The tweets themselves were often reporting rumours; by the end of the week the authorities were setting up decoy tweets to lure protesters into traps or to spread disinformation. I could not verify anything.

Yet I could use basic common sense and judgment, provide context and caveats, offer an array of breaking opinion sources and quotes, and let my readers use their own judgment as to what was going on. That meant occasional corrections and revisions – but the point of blogging is a first draft of history, warts and all.

When you review the Twitter stream of the past week, it reads like a stream of constantly shifting consciousness. It is a kind of journalistic pointillism. From a distance it gains heft. It is history rendered in the collective, scattered mind and it has never happened before - millions upon millions of tiny telegram messages sent to the world.

I don’t know where this media revolution is headed any more than I know where the Iranian uprising is headed. What I do know is that something changed last week - something we will not forget and that will transform the way we cover and consume breaking news. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fascinating..and the whole story of
the Tweeters in Iran is very emotional. I'm betting corporatemedia hates twitter. "Reporting from the ground up" instead of the corporatewhores calling all the shots so the people will be remain null and void?..you decide which is better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Yep to all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Fareed Zakaria says yep, too..
<snip>>

"Fatal wound' inflicted on Iranian regime's ideology"

"In the meantime, using online social networking sites such as Twitter, Iranians have been able to get around the government's efforts to restrict media coverage, and the outcry against the election result has intensified."

<much more>>>
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/06/19/zakaria.iran.elections/index.html?iref=mpstoryview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting.
It seems to be more confusing than enlightening. It's like millions and millions of half-thoughts all scattered about the universe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It can take a little while for certain "better sources" to congeal out of the maelstrom...
Edited on Sun Jun-21-09 05:36 PM by BlooInBloo
depending on how busy things are, and what-not. But in practice, it's not really as big a problem as it theoretically sounds like it might be on paper.

And with a brazillion people ready to call bullshit at the drop of a hat, it's arguable which is the more likely problem: people telling the truth and getting crapped on, or people making shit up and being accepted.

In any case, twitter is an excellent comms mechanism for liveblogging-style situations. And Iran popped up at JUST the right (wrong?) time, to be the granddaddy of them all (thus far).

In a way you almost feel sorry for the current regime. They TRULY could not have predicted this. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Twitter has been useful...
I think most people would say? But how do we organize it into a coherent language? Or do we just make shit up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "But how do we organize it into a coherent language?" - wrong question, coming from wrong viepoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Uh, OK...
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. You need pattern recognition,
which is a form of intelligence that organizes countless bits of input into a coherent bigger picture. We used to rely on outside authorities to tell us what to make of complex events. Now we are increasingly forced to develop our own intuitive bullshit detectors to separate the wheat from the chaff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. There are other, independent dimensions to that, but yah...
The structure of hubs/authorities is the sort of thing I have in mind.

In any case, there will be some who just never hop on board, yearning melodramatically for the good ol days when Walter Cronkite told them everything they needed to know, and then they went to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. "Ambient Awareness"
I'm not sure who came up with that phrase to describe Twitter, but I really like it.

On Friday, I was in line at Billy's Bakery in NYC (awesome cupcakes), and some fool was really ticked off by the long line and bitched to his friend... "Ugh! You should have checked Twitter before coming here!"

I thought that was such a contrast to how Iranian protesters are using Twitter... For example, to find out which areas to avoid where helicopters are "pouring acid" on people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Heh. Sounds like something Clay Shirky would say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Twitter's Impact On The Media?
Whatever the hell we tell you it's impact on the media is, via twitter of course. LULZ! URDUM

I read the first sentence of the article and got bored with it.

:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC