Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why I am opposed to requiring people to purchase health insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:36 AM
Original message
Why I am opposed to requiring people to purchase health insurance
Proponents of the Massachusetts model say that it is no different than requiring drivers to carry car insurance. But that is nonsense, for one very simple reason (we don't even have to discuss the success or failure of the idea in Massachusetts): you don't have a choice about being alive. Remember, suicide is illegal. So, legally, you can't even choose to opt out, while you can always decide to use public transportation or ride a bike instead of driving a car. It's just fundamentally unfair, it seems to me.

Rant off.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Party Person Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. thats why I fight for public option nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Suicide is not illegal
There is no federal law prohibiting it, nor is it illegal in any of the 50 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. ATTEMPTED Suicide IS Illegal
But suicide itself is not.

What are they going to do to somebody who commits suicide, hang 'em?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Which jurisdictions make attempted suicide illegal?
Can you provide a cite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sorry, an old joke.
Attempted suicide itself is not legally defined as a crime.

However, any person who attempts suicide can be found by a judge to be a danger to themself and thus forcibly detained in a hospital for psychiatric care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Attempted suicide is no longer illegal in most jurisdictions.
Physician assisted suicide is now legal in two states with ballot initiatives pending in 4 more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I stand corrected. But it's not really germane.
You still don't really have much choice. You had absolutely nothing to do with your birth, and the only option you have if you can't afford health government-mandated health insurance is to end your life. Seems a little harsh to me.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. A counter argument to your analogy.
Maybe a weak one, but here goes:

If the opt-outers could somehow pledge to never use hospitals or clinics or ambulances or anything else that we all ultimately pay into through out health plans...

...Then your point would be solid.

It does seem unfair, I cannot disagree.

What makes me feel less concerned is the possibility that whomever is required to purchase it will be financially able to, and if it's at a reasonable price I see little difference between this and witholding
SSI from earnings-- that's not voluntary either.

If we raise the fucking cap on SSI, we can put a lot toward free care for all.

Oh, and cut the crazy defense budget in half, then we'd have surpluses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Exactly. If we have programs to help those who cannot pay for health insurance, then if they opt out
they should be required to sign a document saying that if their ability to pay medical bills cannot first be verified, then they request no treatment. They should have to carry a document, renewed annually, stated what their "worth" is and if, in an emergency situation, the estimated cost of the care exceeded that cost, then they wouldn't get care.

Of course, this would never work because we would never deny emergency care.

I don't think there should be an opt-out option if there are programs to help those who cannot afford to pay. If someone fails to voluntarily pay, then there will be a fine on their taxes, equivalent to the cost of the public option, and this will automatically enroll them in the public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. Attempted (and successful suicide is LEGAL in OR & WA when certain medical conditions are met.
Edited on Sun Jun-21-09 11:10 AM by lindisfarne
Does anyone know- is medical euthanasia considered "suicide" for the purpose of life insurance policies in those states (or at least the kind of suicide which would negate the insurer's requirement to pay)? One would hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cresent City Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. The car insurance analogy is flawed as you say
Edited on Sun Jun-21-09 11:13 AM by Cresent City Kid
One similarity though is the fact that there is no freedom at the buyer's end and too little cost control at the seller's end. In Louisiana when they passed their car insurance requirement the attitude was not "help the poor get insurance" it was "get 'em off the road." The penalties were incrementally stepped up to the point of impounding vehicles on the spot while little was done to regulate costs.

With health care, excessive compensation and profiteering are baked in to the cost of everything. Requiring us to sustain the unsustainable is not a solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Riding a bicycle now because i can't afford gas & insurance, I appreciate your analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC