Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British government spells end of 'i before e' rule

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 09:43 PM
Original message
British government spells end of 'i before e' rule
It's a spelling mantra that generations of schoolchildren have learned _ "i before e, except after c."

But new British government guidance tells teachers not to pass on the rule to students, because there are too many exceptions.

The "Support For Spelling" document, which is being sent to thousands of primary schools, says the rule "is not worth teaching" because it doesn't account for words like 'sufficient,' 'veil' and 'their.'

Jack Bovill of the Spelling Society, which advocates simplified spelling, said Saturday he agreed with the decision.

But supporters say the ditty has value because it is one of the few language rules that most people remember.

http://roadrunner.com/home/home/article/rr/9000/8114305/British_government_spells_end_of_i_before_e_rule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. how bout Colonel?
cud u pls ask them to fix this while they are at it.

thank you


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. English sucks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. 'i before e, except after c, WHEN THE SOUND IS LONG E!'
Except for Recieve (and other forms of the word).

'e before i when the sound is long a as in neighbor and weigh.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Screw that, blame it on your spell checker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. "'I' before 'E', except after 'C', or when sounded like 'A,' as in 'neighbor' & 'weigh'".
That's how I learned it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. EXACTLY! Works every time. Of course,
if you don't know the difference between "there" and "their"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Surely there must be some weird exception to this rule. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. sufficient and recieve both would be exceptions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. heifer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. it's "receive". see, if you'd used the rule...:>)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. How about "weird"?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Yes, I think that was the point of Frank's post.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. Same here n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. Weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great. They want their children to be just as ignorant as Americans.
The "exceptions" cited are ridiculous -- when the sound is a long "a" as in "veil", "neighbor", "weigh", it's not THAT complicated to teach that the "e" comes before the "i".

In the case of "their", all you have to remember is that it's a tense of the word "they" -- therefore the "e" naturally follows the "th".

There is actually plenty of logic to the English language if you understand the etymology, and the etymology is really fascinating! Why don't they teach THAT instead dumbing kids down? :grr:

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Because the time it takes to incite learning isn't cost-effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Yeah, who needs learning when you're destined for corporate serfhood anyway. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let's weigh a sleigh of fiends, friends, and neighbors.
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. What you do at your holiday parties is your own business, but keep it to yourself , weirdo.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. You don't have to be Einstein to know that...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fine, right after they fix Worcestershire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
24. I LOVE Worcestershire! Enhances a steak's flavor instead of
covering it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nooooooo!
Say it isn't so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. A horrible language to spell
Edited on Sat Jun-20-09 10:08 PM by izquierdista
Second only to the worst language of all time, French. Both of these snooty languages need to come down off their high horse and have a well thought out plan to conform the spelling to the actual modern day pronunciation. Languages where this has been done have seen an increase in literacy (not too bad a problem in England and France, I'll admit) and it cuts the problems with dyslexia to almost none. But where to start? If you think the health insurance lobby had the country tied up in knots, wait until you try to take on the schoolmarms and anal-retentive grammarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midwestern Democrat Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
27. I had a professor from Germany who once remarked that in Germany
the idea of holding a "Spelling Bee" would be unfathomable - the German language has such precise spelling/pronunciation rules that such a contest would be pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh, bullshit. It's a great rule. Learn the exceptions, and buck up! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. or when sounding like "a" as in neighbor and sleigh
ient is a suffix.

Now this kind of dumbing down is truly scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. "No, Brian. It's i before e except after c and when sounding like a as in neighbor and weigh,
..and on weekends and holidays and all throughout May, and you'll always be wrong no matter what you say!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TCJ70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. That's a hard rule...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. LOL
My 2nd favorite comedian after Eddie Izzard. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. I always thought it meant something else.
Edited on Sat Jun-20-09 11:48 PM by RandomThoughts
Eye before E(5?) except after see(or sea)

Neighbor and weigh. Two other things that sort of match the flow of that thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
22. English has got to have the most fucked up orthography on the planet
Edited on Sun Jun-21-09 12:38 AM by Odin2005
It represents the pronunciation of English as it was 600 years ago and interpreted by Norman-French scribes. Screw that!


If I was put in charge of reforming English spelling my topic line would be spelled thusly:

"Ingglish haz got tuw hav ðu mowst fukt up orþografiy on ðu planut."

"It repriyzents ðu prownunsiyashun uv Ingglish speling az it wuz 600 yiyrz ugow and intrpritid bay Norman-French skraybz. Skruw ðat!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
25. I'll care when they pronounce the word "schedule" the way the Good Lord intended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
28. Thier decieved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
30. 'neighbour' has been misspelled 7 times in this thread
So I'm not listening to those people.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. And there's no defence for their doing that!
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
31. One fucking rule I can remember and agree to obey, and now they want to shitcan it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fozzledick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
35. It's a weird science!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. I agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
36. What I've noticed about Brits is that they tend to be either
excellent writers or practically illiterate. Very little in between. You should see some of the e-mails I got in response to requests for B&B reservations on my two recent trips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
40. I like George Carlin's solution
Make an e looking i and an i looking e and put the dot in the middle.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
42. Bah, the British don't even know how to spell "color" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
44. I just want them to take the "ugh" out of English: though, through, cough ...
... although, bough, cough, dough, enough, plough, rough, slough, thorough, through, tough, trough ... and no doubt more.

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6000eliot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
45. The problem with all of these "rules" is that when English spelling was regularized,
the English language SOUNDED different. The "K" and the "GH" in the word "knight" were all pronounced at one time, so the word sounded like "keneekt." There is no such thing as a "silent" letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. DUPE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC