Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge rejects argument Cheney needs to be shielded from Daily Show

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 02:12 PM
Original message
Judge rejects argument Cheney needs to be shielded from Daily Show
Tired of waving the national security flag, Obama administration lawyers are apparently trying another tactic to get the courts to back Bush administration arguments which never worked to prevent the release of critical documents. Forget Qaeda or North Korea, late night hosts who tell jokes are why the government should retain its secrets.

“A federal judge yesterday sharply questioned an assertion by the Obama administration that former Vice President Richard B. Cheney’s statements to a special prosecutor about the Valerie Plame case must be kept secret, partly so they do not become fodder for Cheney’s political enemies or late-night commentary on The Daily Show,” R. Jeffrey Smith reports for The Washington Post.

The AP reports, “Justice Department lawyers told the judge that future presidents and vice presidents may not cooperate with criminal investigations if they know what they say could become available to their political opponents and late-night comics who would ridicule them.”

“If we become a fact-finder for political enemies, they aren’t going to cooperate,” Justice Department attorney Jeffrey Smith said. “I don’t want a future vice president to say, `I’m not going to cooperate with you because I don’t want to be fodder for ‘The Daily Show.’”

More from the Post:

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan expressed surprise during a hearing here that the Justice Department, in asserting that Cheney’s voluntary statements to U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald were exempt from disclosure, relied on legal claims put forward last October by a Bush administration political appointee, Stephen Bradbury. The department asserted then that the disclosure would make presidents and vice presidents reluctant to cooperate voluntarily with future criminal investigations.

SOURCE: http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/06/19/judge-rejects-argument-cheney-needs-to-be-shielded-from-daily-show/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jon Stewart
The most powerful man in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is the most confused excuse I've ever heard in my life.
"If we let you get tot all the facts, then people on TV might get the idea that they should repeat those facts."

Is this Nader's fault, or is this the "5 months" thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why does this seem like another step into the Twilight Zone?
Future Presidents will be afraid they will be made fun of by Jon Stewart?

That's just :silly: .

Welcome to Bizarro World.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. So now we're trying to protect Americans from satirists?
Edited on Sat Jun-20-09 02:38 PM by KansDem
First it was al Qaeda, now it's the "Al Capps" of late-night television?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Mind blowing indeed
The most stupid argument ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. WTF?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. How can someone with no heart be so thin-skinned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democraticinsurgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is NOT the Onion?
Saw that headline and figured it must be.

Stranger than fiction...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-20-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Justice Department will continue Bush policies until they are told not to
And apparently Eric Holder has not told them to stop yet. One presumes Obama has not told Eric Holder to tell his Department to stop yet either, because if he had done that either they would have stopped or we would be listening to confirmation hearings for a new AG - which we are not.

So where does the blame lay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC