Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A.I.G. Balks at Claims From Jet Ditching in Hudson

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 05:43 PM
Original message
A.I.G. Balks at Claims From Jet Ditching in Hudson
For the first couple of days after his flight ditched into the Hudson River, Paul Jorgenson was just glad to be alive. But then he started to need his laptop, his wallet, his car keys -- all the essentials he had stowed under his seat and left behind in the sinking plane.

A pleasant woman at US Airways told him not to worry; he would be made whole for his losses. But then the matter shifted to US Airways' insurer, the American International Group, operating under government stewardship since its bailout last fall.

When a homeowner has a burglary or a driver has a crash, all it normally takes is a call to the insurance company and a description of the loss to activate the policy. But aviation liability insurance is different. It is activated by a finding of negligence on the part of an airline. If there is no negligence, then arguably there is no liability, and no obligation to pay claims.

That poses a problem for the passengers of US Airways Flight 1549. They suffered real losses and injuries, but they are widely perceived as having been saved from sudden, violent death by their heroic and quick-thinking flight crew, led by Capt. Chesley B. Sullenberger.

"Insurance companies try to protect their assets, obviously," said Bruce D. Chadbourne, a co-author of the book, "Introduction to Aviation Insurance and Risk Management," and a professor in the business school at Embry Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Fla. With the airline wearing a halo, A.I.G. "is going to play hardball."

http://finance.yahoo.com/insurance/article/107188/aig-balks-at-Claims-from-jet-ditching-in-hudson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. i see they haven't lost their deft touch at public relations
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I would
sue the shit out of those birds!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fuck AIG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. bet what was lost was gucci shoes
Nikon cameras and Swiss watches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Makes sense
Since the caused was Geese. No negligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. You'd think they'd be smart enough to pay the high-profile claims...
and limit their denials to anonymous, individual claims.

This is going to bite AIG in the ass. People are already pissed and AIG just can't help parading their greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorMyEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. It sounded like AIG were being typical assholes - but then I read the article
When you actually read the linked article I think it becomes more apparent that AIG isn't the only one capable of being an asshole. Each passenger was already given $5000 right off the bat. They're being offered an additional $5000 if they agree to make that their last claim. But some are bitching and complaining that they want their $10,000 AND the ability to sue later. One or the other, buddy. One or the other.

Oh, and I think three free therapy sessions is a reasonable offer too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. They got money up front, they have been offered more, they have
the opportunity to write a book, and THEY ARE ALIVE. Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC