Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Faulty [Iranian] Election Results...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 01:40 PM
Original message
Faulty [Iranian] Election Results...
Iran’s Interior Ministry has declared President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the winner of yesterday’s election. This has been rejected by all the three opponents of Mr. Ahmadinejad, Messrs Mir Hossein Mousavi, Mahdi Karroubi, and Mohsen Rezaaee.

The best evidence for the validity of the arguments of the three opponents of the President for rejecting the results declared by the Interior Ministry is the data the Ministry itself has issued. In the chart below, compiled based on the data released by the Ministry and announced by Iran’s national television, a perfect linear relation between the votes received by the President and Mir Hossein Mousavi has been maintained, and the President’s vote is always half of the President’s. The vertical axis (y) shows Mr. Mousavi’s votes, and the horizontal (x) the President’s. R^2 shows the correlation coefficient: the closer it is to 1.0, the more perfect is the fit, and it is 0.9995, as close to 1.0 as possible for any type of data.

Statistically and mathematically, it is impossible to maintain such perfect linear relations between the votes of any two candidates in any election — and at all stages of vote counting. <snip>

More from TehranBureau...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Idiotic mathematical analysis
Edited on Sat Jun-13-09 02:42 PM by GoesTo11
The percentage for Mousawi increased substantially as new results came in. Of course when you show an increasing total of any two things, you would expect a high R-squared. Don't know if there was fraud, but this isn't evidence of it. Hear that Andrew Sullivan?

Tally A M Change A Change M New M votes/New A votes
Initial 7027919 2955131 7027919 2955131 0.420484499
1 10230478 4628912 3202559 1673781 0.522638615
2 14011664 6575844 3781186 1946932 0.514899822
3 15913256 7526117 1901592 950273 0.499724967
4 16974382 8124690 1061126 598573 0.564092294
5 18302924 8929232 1328542 804542 0.605582661


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC