Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can anyone tell me why employers should be the ones who provide health insurance?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:45 PM
Original message
Can anyone tell me why employers should be the ones who provide health insurance?
Let me begin with the disclaimer that I'm woefully under-informed and befuddled about health care issues.

I've long wondered, though, why we should have a health care system that puts employers in the role of insurance brokers. I can understand how that system may have gotten started. It was probably a good deal for employers and their workers alike. Health insurance would have been a form of compensation employers could offer that was as valuable as cash to their workers, but could be purchased by the employer at a bulk discount. A side benefit to the employer would be that a healthy workforce is a more productive workforce.

It seems to me, though, that as health-care costs have spiraled out of control, the burden of providing health insurance is becoming increasingly difficult for businesses to bear. It's inherently inefficient as well - why do we need the middleman represented by the employer-as-insurance-broker? Why does the employer need the expense of supporting an internal bureaucracy to administer health benefits?

And, for my part: as a worker, why is my health insurance tied to my present employment? Why should I have to change insurance policies whenever I change jobs, which is much more frequent and common than it was a few generations ago?

I guess these objections amount to a good case for single-payer health care, though by no means the only case. Aren't employers eager to get out from under the burden of providing health insurance, so they can devote more resources to their real business? If so, where is their support for single-payer? No matter how much the general public might want it, I don't think we'll ever see single-payer until big companies want it. Then we'll see it pronto.

I'd be grateful for any insights into these questions that others might be able to offer. In your replies, please remember my naivety on the subject, and bear this mantra in mind:
Information good.:dunce:
Flame bad.:grr:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why, silly, because that's the way it's always been done! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. To keep you chained to your desk n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fringe benefits
were once a tool to get the best and the brightest. Back in the days when people actually could take their pick of decent jobs, the amount and type of benefits an employer was willing to provide in addition to a decent wage would determine the offer you'd take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. They shouldn't. But then I am an evil socialist. I don't support the existence
Edited on Tue Jun-09-09 06:49 PM by kestrel91316
of medical insurance, except as a luxury procedure supplement to

SINGLE PAYER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Medical insurers are FUCKING PARASITES and they KILL. When is this country gonna figure out that they have drained us dry?? They are hookworms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. It goes back to the bad old days when labor unions were first forming.
People's perception about government were different in those days. Back then, the government did not help labor unions, at least until FDR. When the labor unions struck and won concessions from their employers, they made their employers kick in money to cover their health care costs. They could not do the same to the federal government.

Now, to FDR's credit he did float the idea of government-provided health care, but he died in 1944 before the war ended and before the idea could get anywhere. Truman tried to take up the banner, but following post-war demobilization, the Republicans won power and with that any chance Truman had of getting a universal health care bill passed.

FDR advocated in his last years something known as the Second Bill of Rights. You can google it if you want, but one of the provisions he included in it was the right to affordable health care, regardless if one was employed or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. It USED to be a fringe benefit
If I recall, when companies actually TRIED to lure talented employees, they'd vie to offer the best "fringe benefits".

Now, in today's "take it or leave it" attitude towards hiring, you're lucky to get health insurance at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. I read that when FDR was President one of his reforms was for
Edited on Tue Jun-09-09 06:58 PM by Cleita
Medicare for everyone, which the unions supported. However, it couldn't get passed in Congress. Then the unions went for employer provided health insurance as a second choice. Of course then businesses started offering their non-union workers insurance as a benefit as well. It's been that way ever since, however it doesn't have to be. Most countries do fund their plans with some kind of payroll tax, partially any way. If we had Medicare for all you wouldn't have to worry about losing your insurance when you lose or change jobs. This is how the Canadians do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. FDR outlined it in his speech during his last State of the Union Address before his death.
Edited on Tue Jun-09-09 07:07 PM by Selatius
Taken from his final Address:

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.


All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.


What luck for the crooked industrialists that FDR died. FDR was the most popular president of the 20th Century in American history except George Washington himself. He could've rallied the people and the votes necessary to pass this into law. He was that popular and beloved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kokonoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought because of wage freezes during the war.
Unable to offer more money. Employers gave extra benefits to get around the freeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. It was a way around wage & price freezes
and once the wage freeze was lifted, people liked it, it was cheap (then) and employers kept it as an attractive benefit.

HMOs emerged and everything changed and got expensive, and were all stuck with it.

People were hostage to their job if they had insurance and were ailing or had a sick child. Bosses used is as leverage and a handy way to avoid ever giving real raises again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. It smacks of fascism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Because it's a form of cherrypicking that the parasite insurance companies just love
Employed adults, are, on average, much healthier than the adult population as a whole. That gives a pack of useless shitstains chance to bet that not many will get sick, which is a profitable bet. They transfer money from the pockets of healthy people to themselves, using as little of it as possible to pay for the care of sick people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. It protects the status quo
and helps keep the workers in their place. If you're worried about your health insurance, you won't make waves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madville Donating Member (743 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's a burden for small and large business
The owner of the company I am with pays $8500 a month for health coverage on his 18 employees, our monthly payroll is around $70,000. I really don't know how any small business makes it anymore paying for health benefits, various insurances and taxes on top of payroll. Look at the billions GM owes the UAW just for health care, health care is killing our economy. I guess it wasn't so bad when everyone drank and smoked and didn't expect to live past 60 because there weren't treatments for many things like nowadays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. Because they fuck with our health every day by driving us into the ground ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:12 AM
Response to Original message
16. How else can they keep you from leaving?
Or starting your own small business?



Jeez, you have to remember... corporate servitude is good, it leads to higher executive pay and shareholder dividends!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. so people can't easily quit their jobs for another one, or a break.
so they will put up with mass shit to keep coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
18. Only people that work for successful companies deserve health insurance.
Everyone else had better die, and decrease the surplus population.

It's the Amerakan way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-10-09 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. Easy - Work Or Die

People who do not have paying jobs are not useful. They should get sick and die for the good of the species.

That was pretty much the message I got during a stretch of unemployment years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC