Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Rupert Murdoch be deported?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:18 PM
Original message
Should Rupert Murdoch be deported?
We all know that Murdoch bought his way into citizenship in a deal with Newt Gingrich. Now he is threatening the President of the United States with terroristic statements. What's your opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deport the bastard
and seize his assets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deport his ass
Castrate him first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. If his statements are threatening...
The Secret Service should be paying him a visit and if it is determined he is a threat to the President, he should be locked up.

Threating should include any comments that might incite violence of others against the President, taking into account his many media publications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. So he is responsible for every word that appears in any entity he owns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Dose the captain not go down with the ship?
Is the boss not responsible for his employees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Not all those that comment in his papers or appear on his TV or radio stations are his employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
73. No, his buddy and partner, Prince Al-Waleed bin Tahal is responsible
for some of those words. He claimed that he could change the word feed on FAUXZERRA in 30 minutes.

http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1375
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatsMyBarack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Godd idea, but what if....
His old country doesn't want him back??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Then we compromise -
drop him in the ocean halfway there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, for fuck's sake,
it's free speech, and if you read it as "threatening," your Sensitivity Meter needs to be adjusted.

That's the kind of freeper comment that makes me think that somehow, some people here at DU don't grasp what the First Amendment is all about ..................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Scary how few people on this thread "get" that. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. pathetic and disgusting how wingnutty some here are.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamaleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
52. Remember though,
Wingnutty is ok, as long as they are of the correct wing.

I threw up a little just typing that. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. You made me queasy, too.........
Nice work.

And welcome to DU..........

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamaleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. Thanks!
Kinda scary thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Yeah, well,
there's a whole lot of interesting pathologies that are stimulated by certain topics. That's what I've discovered, and I've been assisted by more experienced DUers who were kind enough to PM me and fill me in whenever I found myself tangled up in something that wasn't making sense.

Sometimes, giving someone the benefit of the doubt is a big, fat waste of time. You just let them go on, ignore them, or walk away from them.

You'll figure it out, but, honestly, DU is a great place. This thread is an aberration, the kind you'll encounter daily, but it's never dull.

Enjoy, and, again, welcome ............................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deport the basterd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. HELL YEAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. What a hideous comment. The man is a US CITIZEN.
Why don't we deport YOU if you say or do something we don't like?

Jesus, the bullshit one reads here some days.

My "opinion" is that your suggesting is disgusting and prejudicial towards our immigrant population. If you have a problem with what the idiot says, confront him on that basis and no other--anyone who advocates deporting anyone they disagree with is not too bright, to put it kindly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. His citizenship was obtained by bribing Gingrich...
Edited on Mon Jun-08-09 06:15 PM by rfranklin
Federal immigration authorities can revoke an immigrant's naturalized citizenship if it was obtained by fraud, a federal appeals court ruled today.

The 2 to 1 ruling by a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the decision of a Seattle judge who said the power of the Immigration and Naturalization Service to revoke citizenship for fraud was open to serious question.

Murdoch offered Gingrich a $2 million book contract at the time that Gingrich was ramming a special citizenship bill for Murdoch through Congress. That makes his citizenship a fraud. Thus, he is not actually a citizen. And he has been calling President Obama "dangerous." I don't think there can be any doubt that this foreigner is implying a threat to the POTUS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. Come on, get real That's never going to happen. Particularly since Newt Gingrich was never
in charge of the INS and had no power to control what they did--that's just craziness.

Rupert Murdoch, even if you, or I, do not care for views (or the views that his TV news station touts--though I DO enjoy the views his entertainment franchises tout, with Family Guy and the rest of the cartoon line-up being my particular favorites) as a US citizen has a right to express those views.

And "open to serious question" just doesn't apply to a guy who has many, many, MANY (did I say MANY) Americans on his payroll--everyone from janitors to lighting guys to make up people to talking heads, to people who create cartoons....and then there's all of that money that gets dumped into the economy as a result of advertising revenues....

If you're going to judge a person by how many Americans they employ, your ass, and mine, would be on the plane to parts unknown, our passports in the shredder, before his was.

It's just a stupid thing to say, whining "DEPORT HIM!!!!" when you don't like someone's views--even if those views are moronic.

I feel like I'm in an alternate universe when I hear that kind of unprogressive shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
62. do you have a link about the book deal?
Gingrich had an ethics problem with a book deal he did with Murdoch in 1995 -- but that was 10 years after Murdoch got his citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #62
67. As I recall,
Newt had to pay a $300,000 fine for violating the Ethics Committee's rules for Congressmen, and then he was out of there.

Do people honestly think someone as high-profile as Rupert Murdoch can somehow "pull strings" to get American citizenship, if, in fact, he goes through the application process like everyone else and meets the requirements? Wouldn't that be really, really stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. right -- that was the 1995 incident. Long after he became a citizen
There were claims that reagan administration officials pulled some strings to expedite murdoch's citizenship application, but nothing that would invalidate it,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
70. for what its worth, the case you describe was overturned two years later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. The man lives in China with his Chinese wife and family most of the time.
He has no loyalties to the USA or even his own homeland Australia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
56. So? Are you saying only those who live in the US are "Red Blooded Americans?"
Jesus, I'm screwed. I spent half my life outside the USA. What a traitor I must be, by those standards!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #56
75. Here have some smelling salts you crazy ex-pat.
Murdoch is an Australian. Are you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
59. link?
He appears a lot at events in the USA for someone who lives full time in China.

I saw him speak on a panel in April.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #59
76. I wish I could give you a better link but the ones I had have been scrubbed.
Here's an older one when he and Wendi were planning on building a home in Beijing. Although they don't live there all year, I hear that this is really his main home. He likes doing business in China or maybe hiding his money there. Wife Wendi has relatives there. You figure it out.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-12/22/content_402256.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #18
77. Could we register him as an agent of the Chinese gov't?
Just for fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. I just read a post here
that called Murdoch out on not being "... a loyal American..."

Joe McCarthy would be so proud .....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Joe McCarthy has nothing to do with it but I wonder why you are calling
on his legacy so diligently?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Because,
you inspire it...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Oh, when you make accusatory remarks like I'm some fascist like
McCarthy, you are going to have to explain it a little better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Was McCarthy a Fascist?
I just thought he was a paranoid drunk who ranted about people not being "loyal Americans".

You're confusing "descriptive" with "accusatory," something that only you can explain, but I'm sure you're not a Fascist................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. He walked like a fascist, talked like a fascist and quacked like one. I'd
say he was a fascist. His soul mate Newt Gingrich is pretty much in the same mold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Fascists forbade criticism of the government -
Rupert Murdoch criticized our government, and you are advocating stripping him of his citizenship and deporting him to his native Australia.

That's mighty Fascist thinking, as I see it, but, free speech lets us all say what we want, within reasonable bounds, and you certainly are welcome to your ideas. But, since it's a message board, we will also find those who do not agree with us.

The Fascists wouldn't like message boards like this one, not at all ................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Obviously you are forbidding me from criticizing him.
I'll bet if he had to go into the INS kangaroo court with the rest of the Mexican illegals, and the legal Arabs, who are being accused of being terrorists, he would have the book thrown at him. Of course he would have to look like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
61. If "loyalty" was a function of how many Americans you had on your payroll
old Rupert would be up there with the freakin' founding fathers.

I can't believe some of this shit. It's stunning, coming from the mouths of so-called progressives. I feel like we've been infected with an influenza of idiotic viewpoints from that hard-to-navigate site.

I also can't believe that I'd be compelled to defend Rupert Murdoch on this board. But if I'm to be true to my beliefs in our system of government, I have no alternative.

I always thought progressives were simply smarter. Fairer, too. I'm getting my eyes opened! Does power, indeed, corrupt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. Imagine how I feel......
I'm under contract to one of his properties. Although he has nothing to do with that particular entity, and if you saw what I did there, you'd hardly characterize it as "conservative," still, it sometimes freaks me out to realize that my fortune in joined with that of Murdoch.

That said, the inability to reconcile points of view that differ from yours is a sign of tolerance. And maturity. And sophisticated thinking. At least, that's what I think.

Watching this recessive exposition is startling and sobering.

A long time ago, a very wise professor at my college told me that the hippies (it was the sixties) would turn out to be the biggest Puritans. I thought he was old and nuts, but, the laugh is on me. Watching some of what is posted here - not just this particular thread, although this one is a doozy - makes me wonder if it's a matter of lacking a background in American history, or a failure of our educational system, or is it that some never bothered to learn how the Constitution works, or did all those Civics classes just go to waste?

A lot of time, though, I think that certain subjects trigger intensely personal, and often quite deviant and inappropriate, reactions.

It's never dull, although a state of being horrified isn't much better than being bored, I must say ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. What did he say?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. I must have missed something. Two questions.
One, what did he say that was "threatening" the President?

Second, I know he became a naturalized US citizen in 1985 in order to get around the Communications Act's foreign ownership rules, but are you suggesting that his citizenshp be revoked because of his statement or because the original naturalization was defective somehow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. See my comment above.
Murdoch is not an American citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Legally he is, until a judge or jury finds fraud and revokes his citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. he is waging a constant campaign against democracy imo
Edited on Mon Jun-08-09 06:55 PM by spanone
fuck him

he's no patriot, but he satisfied the legal requirements...

~snip~

On September 4, 1985, Murdoch became a naturalized citizen in order to satisfy the legal requirement that only US citizens were permitted to own American television stations.


In 1995, Murdoch's Fox Network became the object of scrutiny from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), when it was alleged that News Ltd.'s Australian base made Murdoch's ownership of Fox illegal. However, the FCC ruled in Murdoch's favor, stating that his ownership of Fox was in the best interests of the public.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asksam Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Since I'm in favor of deporting all Rethugs...
... yeah, boot Murdoch out.

(OK, I know we can't deport all Rethugs. But that doesn't stop me from fantasizing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think so. He's not a loyal American by any means.
Also, his main residence is in China not here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. "... a loyal American ..."
That sounds far too much like Joe McCarthy.

Unbelievable what you find on DU sometimes. Utterly unbelievable.

"... a loyal American ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Sometimes we have to say the words, no matter how uncomfortable
they might be. However, if you want your country bought and sold by a billionaire jerk whose main loyalties are to China, be my guest. We already have been bought and sold to the Saudis by eight years of unloyal Americans, whom everyone was afraid to call that because it was too McCarthy, to
POINT OUT THE TRUTH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. "... uncomfortable ..."
doesn't begin to describe what I'm feeling as I read your words.

Maybe not Joe McCarthy. Maybe HUAC would have been a more suitable landing place.................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Maybe my language isn't as elegant as those of you who pretend to be
writers. What I say is from my heart. A man like him who laughs at the rest of us and especially has no loyalty to our Constitution, while enjoying all his multi-billionaire perks in Manhattan and elsewhere in the world, including China, deserves to be spit upon, not defended by Americans unless they are bankers or hedge fund managers. I do hope you aren't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I am someone who holds the First Amendment
quite sacred, and your reading of history, of what happened during the time of HUAC and Senator McCarthy, suggests that you do not have the same devotion to it as I do.

I'm sure your heart is in a good place, and that it is a very good heart, but we who demand free speech for ourselves must demand it for those whose speech we find hateful.

In fact, we must demand the most protection for the most hateful speech, because that is where all our freedoms lie.

Rupert Murdoch's business dealings - and I must confess, as someone who is under contract to one of Murdoch's babies, HarperColiins, a remarkably liberal outfit, by the way, populated by the coolest, bluest people you could imagine - have nothing to do with his patriotism. You might well question the patriotism of George H. W. Bush, who is entwined intimately with the Carlyle Group, and has been for decades, or you might question the patriotism of anyone who makes money by doing business with countries that our government finds acceptable, but you do not.

Your standards are different from what the Constitution calls for, but, as you said, you are speaking from your heart. Far too often, the road to hell really is paved with good intentions ................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. "You might well question the patriotism of George H. W. Bush,
You might well question the patriotism of George H. W. Bush, who is entwined intimately with the Carlyle Group, and has been for decades, or you might question the patriotism of anyone who makes money by doing business with countries that our government finds acceptable, but you do not."

I do all the time and when those Nazis are brought to justice it will be a great day in our country. My standards are Thomas Paines actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Nazis ........
I have a rule, and that is that when someone gratuitously introduces "Nazis" into what had heretofore been rather civilized discourse, I leave..........................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Buh bye!
I have the same problem with being compared to McCarthy. However, I will stick around for fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. The Bush Crime Family are LITERALLY Nazis
They funded Hitler, and continued to profit from his regime, even during the war, mostly from a steel factory that used concentration camp slave labor.

Is that NAZI enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. HUAC is really rude of you as I knew people who were banned and they
were friends of mine. I wonder why you people want to own the conversation because you don't like certain words and concepts. It makes me believe that you want to bring up these things so people will back down and not say the truth as they see it. Do you also object to the word Nazi? Especially when it's used in reference to just about anyone in the Bush administration? Do you? Or are you going to accuse me of Stalinism this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. I simply find it offensive
that you demand someone you describe as not a "loyal American" should be deported because you don't agree with his politics.

That's what the people of HUAC did, and they, too, had lots of supporters..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. It has nothing to do with his politics. He can be the biggest
ass hole right wing Republican he wants to be as long as all he does is take it to the voting booth. He has systematically used his propaganda news machine to undermine any free speech in his country Australia, Great Britain and now ours. Please tell me that Fox News is fair and balanced and I will sell you San Quentin Prison. Oh, sorry Arnold beat me to that one. Murdoch isn't a bit interested in making this country a better one, only exploiting it for his own inflated ego. My mother was a naturalized immigrant and I have known many of them who appreciated this country and wanted to make it a better place. Murdoch isn't that immigrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #49
58. should every media outlet be required to be "fair and balanced"
should newspapers be required to be "fair and balanced" (as determined by whom, I might ask)

FoxNews is not a broadcast outlet, by the way. Its not "licensed" by the government. It has free speech rights essentially equivalent to those of a newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. They used to be because they followed journalistic principles, something
Murdoch knows, but cynically has tossed aside for propaganda and sensationalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
19. Has he even set foot in this country? Since?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Good...just revoke his citizenship....
and cancel his passport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. He lives in Manhattan .......
His two daughters are in school there...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chisox08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. Persona non Grata
Kick him out and shut down Fixed News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well, sure -- better safe than sorry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Badgerman Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
39. Too expensive, deportation not a certainty...just shoot him! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Badgerman Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
41. Too expensive, deportation not a certainty...just shoot him! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
48. Send that roofucker packing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
57. He should be fired out of a cannon.
I don't care where he lands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
66. He should pull a Nixon and just threaten him with deportation.
Not like it would do much, since Murdoch is so fucking rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
68. Get him the fuck out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
71. Only if he carries Hannity under one arm ...



... and O'Reilly under the other.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
72. to Uranus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
74. The Secret Service needs to investigate him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. for what?
I asked above, but didn't get an answer: what did he say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
79. No. He would just spend even more time in the UK fucking up our media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
80. He's a US citizen so you guys are stuck with him. Suckers!
When he gave up his Australian citizenship and got US citizenship for the very noble aim of building a media empire in the US, there wasn't a clause that allowed for buyers remorse later on down the track. Unfortunately there also wasn't a clause to stop him returning here and trying to interfere in election campaigns that he can no longer vote in anyway...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
81. Seize his American assets and deport his ass.
Let him go live in China and see if they put up with his crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC