Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whale Wars Series 2 is Back (Sea Shepherd) - Los Angeles Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 12:08 PM
Original message
Whale Wars Series 2 is Back (Sea Shepherd) - Los Angeles Times
(Whale Wars Series 2, Animal Planet, Fridays, 9 pm)

Capt. Paul Watson, whose Sea Shepherd Society has drawn praise and harsh criticism for its sometimes confrontational encounters with Japanese whalers, says of the second season of the Animal Planet series, "Whale Wars," which debuts tonight at 9 p.m.: "It ought to be 10 times more dramatic and exciting than last year."

That's because last year's shows, which were based on the 2007-08 exploits of Watson and crew, contained very little drama and excitement. This year it'll be different because Watson's 2008-09 campaign against whalers in the Antarctic included numerous confrontations -- including three collisions and a very dramatic pursuit through ice -- with Japanese crews that regard Sea Shepherd as a terrorist group. "They were very aggressive toward us -- the most aggressive I've ever seen them -- so it's a far more dramatic season for that reason," Watson said in an interview this week. Sea Shepherd's tactics are to disrupt the months-long hunt and any efforts by whalers to transfer harpooned whales onto the processing ship. Japan employes a research loophole in the wording of an international whaling moratorium to justify the hunts, which annually target nearly 1,000 minke whales and 50 endangered fin whales. Minke whales are not endangered and the country for generations has sold whale meat at market. Whaling, Japan has argued, is deep-rooted in the nation's culture.

Watson, one of the co-founders of Greenpeace, is either revered or despised for the controversial methods he employs. Greenpeace and other whale conservation groups consider his efforts too confrontational and potentially perilous. Watson counters that Sea Shepherd doesn't violate laws and has not injured anyone. He has lots of critics and does not care. "People think we're sort of arrogant in what we do," he said. "But as I always say, our clients are whales and we don't really care what people think. We're more concerned with what the whales think. Find me a whale that disagrees with what we do and I'll reconsider."

During the 2008-09 hunt (summer in the Antarctic), Japan fell 305 minke whales short of its quota, so Sea Shepherd is taking credit for saving those whales. The whalers killed only one fin whale, so Sea Shepherd is saying it saved 49 fin whales. "We saved 500 whales the year before, 500 whales the year before that and 83 whales the year before that," Watson boasted. Japan, which requires a high quota to profit from these hunts, has fallen short in recent years but remains steadfast and some believe it will announce, later this month, its intention to add endangered humpback whales to its quota list.

Sea Shepherd also remains steadfast. Watson said his crew will greet the Japanese fleet in 2009-10 with three vessels instead of one, enabling a longer and more effective campaign because it will allow for a constant presence, whereas with only one vessel there is a need to make long refueling voyages. Asked if having film crews aboard embolden his crew to a dangerous level, Watson responded: "That's absolutely not true. We can't control the Japanese and the problem is one-sided. Those guys are trying to kills us and their government will defend them if they do. But we have to take every precaution to ensure we don't injure any of them. It's a very one-sided battle and I have to be very careful."

--Pete Thomas

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/outposts/2009/06/whale-wars-is-back-and-so-is-controversial-capt-paul-watson-.html





video promo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRk9kwuMi2s&


www.seashepherd.org







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Three??!!!??!!!
I had heard about a second boat, but a second and a third? Oh, happy happy dance!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. In the last episode (the premier) they said 2 of the boats kill the whales and the 3rd processes the
meat for shipment. I think the Ushin Maroo (I know the spelling is wrong) is the mothership of the fleet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not the whaling fleet, Sea Shepherd.
Sea Shepherd has always had only the one ship for this campaign. The article states that this coming year's campaign they will have three.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. I must have read that wrong or got confuzled...
Edited on Sun Jun-07-09 04:50 PM by Shagbark Hickory
"Sea Shepherd also remains steadfast. Watson said his crew will greet the Japanese fleet in 2009-10 with three vessels instead of one, enabling a longer and more effective campaign because it will allow for a constant presence, whereas with only one vessel there is a need to make long refueling voyages."

My brain fast mapped that to the comment they said in Friday's premier when they talked about the Whaler's fleet. Maybe the article got it wrong cuz they also mentioned what an old boat teh sea shepherd is and it's showing it's age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. The Steve Irwin is an aging vessel, yes. Roughly 35 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. I hope the show is bringing them money.
Well, I know it is - several of my friends got Sea Shepherd hats and shirts as Christmas presents last year. Figure they're not alone in this. :D Can't hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think they're all coo-coo but wish them the best in kicking whaler ass and saving whales. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. My problem is that they're DANGEROUS "coo-coo".
...and now they're sensationalizing it even further playing to TV cameras.

I'm all for saving whales, but one does NOT ram other ships in international waters. Watson is going to seriously injure or kill somebody one of these days.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I figure it's going to be Watson and his crew
I predict in five years time, or less, the Japanese whalers will decide Sea Shepherd poses a mortal threat to their safety and they'll buy some torpedoes to protect themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Except for the fact that it'd be illegal, I'd agree.
I can see them continuing to use the sound cannons and stepping up their non-lethal defenses, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. hurray for Sea Shepherd! nt
Edited on Sun Jun-07-09 12:23 PM by Mari333
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. I just found this show. My SO has direct tv.... Direct Action Gets Satisfaction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rock on Captain Paul
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ex Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. I saw an ad for it
with a whale getting killed. I can't bring myself to watch the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. There was a surprisingly graphic scene or a clip of a whale getting harpooned. I don't blame you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. It is hard to watch. Very hard.
Edited on Sun Jun-07-09 05:46 PM by Withywindle
I wish they wouldn't use that footage in promotions, but they do. That's the reason Sea Shepherd does what it does, though - to make it stop.

It's not something you actually see on the show very often, though. Most of the show is about sailing and interpersonal dynamics and direct-action strategy and tactics. Besides bringing public awareness to the issue of killing whales, I think it's full of stuff that any activist group can learn from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC