Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA: "It's Time To Deliver-Health Care Reform-Is Not A Luxury"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 09:34 AM
Original message
OBAMA: "It's Time To Deliver-Health Care Reform-Is Not A Luxury"
Edited on Sun Jun-07-09 09:38 AM by kpete
Obama to Forge a Greater Role on Health Care
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
Published: June 6, 2009

WASHINGTON — After months of insisting he would leave the details to Congress, President Obama has concluded that he must exert greater control over the health care debate and is preparing an intense push for legislation that will include speeches, town-hall-style meetings and much deeper engagement with lawmakers, senior White House officials say.

..................

But Mr. Obama has grown concerned that he is losing the debate over certain policy prescriptions he favors, like a government-run insurance plan to compete with the private sector, said one Democrat familiar with his thinking. With Congress beginning a burst of work on the measure, top advisers say, the president is determined to make certain the final bill bears his stamp.

more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/07/us/politics/07policy.html?_r=1&hp

.................

"This issue, health care reform, is not a luxury," Obama said during his weekly radio and Internet address, released Saturday while he visited France. "It's not something that I want to do because of campaign promises or politics. This is a necessity. This is something that has to be done."

Releasing an address on domestic policy on the heels of a major speech to Muslims in Cairo, the 65th anniversary of D-Day in Normandy, France, and visits to Saudi Arabia and Germany showed Obama's commitment to health, advisers said.

Even while completing a whirlwind overseas trip, Obama used his weekly message to push for a health care plan whose momentum has slowed while the economy continued its downward slide. Initial bursts of activity have been overshadowed by the struggling auto industry, worried financial institutions and climbing unemployment.

"All across America, our families are making hard choices when it comes to health care. Now, it's time for Washington to make the right ones," Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address, released Saturday morning from the White House while Obama was in Paris.

"It's time to deliver."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090606/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_health_overhaul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. If not now, when?
K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Anything short of single payer
is not reform.

It is a sell out that undoubtedly will make some folks feel sanctimonious and self-righteous while doing nothing to improve access to health care for many of the millions who canot afford health insurance and/or health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Nonsense. utter and complete. A viable public option
would make it reform on a rather large scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is Attainable. Single Payer, much as we might prefer it, is not. Not yet.
We can cry all we want on this discussion board about how this is not enough, that anything less than single payer is some sort of joke.

I'd rather have improvements that help than to resist them while I insist on having something that I will not get.

We don't presently have a Congress that will let Single Payer happen.

It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maybe the President fears he's losing some on his healthcare
policy and I am assuming that includes a public option. Have you seen this post?:http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5794961

It outlines what our congresscritters may have in store to handle a public option. President Obama has good reason to worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I did see that thread...
I'd love to see big pharma put out of our misery, let our universities and publicly funded research agencies provide these products at cost.

Of course, much as it makes sense, it's unlikely to happen.

Even our military services are being privatized.

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Even with public option health care there will still be many people
that go without health care and live diminished lives and die unnecesarily early deaths because they cannot afford to secure necessary health care. Public option health insurance won't do anything for folks who cannot afford it. Perhaps you find that acceptable. I don't.

Blame COngress all you want. But the real failure rests within our citizenry. We are too ignorant and/or too selfish to insist that single payer be enacted. I guess it is easy to compromise with somebody else's life and well-being.

And, yeah, it's just that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. The US not having UHC is appaling...
There is no fucking excuse for it at all. Turning Everything over to the free market is utterly insane, you see what it has gotten us? right on some things and severally wrong on others.

Some things, just on principle, should not be for profit and Health Care is on of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. if we're going to have UHC...
then we need to pay for it. that means taxes go up. enough with this borrowing bullshit. it's making me very, very nervous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Our taxes may go up, but you will save by not paying for
Junkets, golden parachutes, obscene bonuses, billion dollar ad campaigns, services you paid for but are denied. You know, the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. That taxes go up is beside the point if premiums to private insurers are eliminated
--and that money put into the pool of money used to pay for health care. We are already paying for universal health care--we just aren't getting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I know that UHC would be a plus for MY pocket...
More than worth any taxes levied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Please...PLEASE tax me a little more so I do not have to stress
about going to the doctor or buying a prescription.

We pay a little less in taxes then France, a 4% tax increase to have UHC is acceptable. Which I am more than happy to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. And you won't have to pay insurance premiums. Should be a net plus n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I know, RIGHT!!
Edited on Mon Jun-08-09 06:01 AM by and-justice-for-all
Insurance companies will not die because of UHC, some will, but private insurance will still exist. It is still available in Germany and I am sure in all the other countries with UHC.

It still exist because some people think that the UHC does not go far enough, so they by a little more. But UHC is really for those who would other wise not have health care at all.

Companies would save MILLIONS from not providing health care to their eployees; you would think that would make them very fuckin' happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. A heart attack is not like an iPod--it is like a house fire
Liposuction is like an iPod, though. Let private insurance take care of that kind of thing. Basic care should be a public good, like the fire department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Spot On!
People will still what Life Insurance, Auto Insurance, Home Owners/Renters insurance..etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. if you can't pay for an unexpected medical emergency
because of the sky-high inflated prices the insurance & drug corps. demand, somehow you're to blame-wtf? It's like breaking a horses' legs then demanding it runs a race to prove it can run-anywhere else this would be a crime, here? It's called "good for business".

Anyone remember good federal health insurance before Reagan got to it in 1980?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. Then he needs to ask Dennis Kucinich and John Conyers in the House, and
Bernie Sanders in the Senate to take over the reins of crafting a plan. Dennis spoke eloquently this afternoon about the folly of allowing the insurers and Big PhRMA to write the plans. He pointed to the failure of Medicare Part D, the prescription drug benefit for seniors as a perfect example of whom not to leave in charge of emptying our treasury twice by allowing them to be part of the program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC