Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suddenly it's OK to call a judicial nominee a racist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:15 AM
Original message
Suddenly it's OK to call a judicial nominee a racist
When the nation learned in 2005 that Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito had belonged to a Princeton University alumni organization that advocated a cap on the number of women and minorities allowed at Princeton, the news media quickly circled the wagons to protect the Bush nominee.

When Alito was asked by Senate Democrats about his membership in the organization -- which he touted while applying for a job in the Reagan administration -- the media denounced them for going too far. The merest hint of a suggestion of an implication that Alito was a member of a racist organization was shouted down as an unfair slander; Democrats were pilloried for making Alito's wife cry with their inappropriate questions (though Mrs. Alito didn't actually start crying until Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham took to the microphone).

Gloria Borger, for example, said that the pertinent question was not whether Alito agreed with the Concerned Alumni of Princeton's clearly racist and sexist stance on university admissions, but "whether the Democrats took this a step too far today." Katie Couric added: "Too much to take: Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito's wife driven to tears after Democrats question his integrity. Did they go too far?" The media consensus that Democrats went "too far" in questioning Alito continues to this day. Fox News' Megyn Kelly recently claimed that during Alito's confirmation hearings, his wife was "crying hysterically after Ted Kennedy made her cry."

http://mediamatters.org/columns/200905290032
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's OK to call a (Democratic) judicial nominee a racist - but only when they're not.
When a (Republican) judicial nominee is an actual racist, it's something that cannot be mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Oh, that would be in very bad taste, don't you know? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've actually heard a republican say
That the election of Obama proves Democrats are racists because they wouldn't vote for the white man (McCain)

and that he expects racism (as he defines it: not voting for the white man) from everything Obama does because of that

and I think the latest round of bullshit from the right ( about Sotomayor) is a reflection of that kind of thinking

Racism and what it is has been twisted around in their minds...so much so that they consider it racism if anyone other than a white person is nominated or elected.


Said republican is a civilian contract employee living here.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. we were once a civil nation.....no longer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I turned to my husband told him to "get me away from this person"
We were on a group trip (day cruise) a couple of weeks back with a bunch of people and this person decided to get on his soapbox....and out comes that gem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thank talk radio/TV for that.
They've turned hate speech into a national pastime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. All I know is I'm getting more and more convinced that a Scotus appointment is for life
Was not one of the founder's better ideas. It's like a potentially bad tattoo you got while drunk one night. Stuck with it. Ok, I'm older and that analogy made more sense when there wasn't simple tattoo removal surgeries with fricken lazer beams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, we did refer to him as "machine gun Sam".....
and Lindsey Graham makes me cry, too - and worse :puke:

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good points
It's amazing how they've had all this ammo ready - almost as if it was all created to fit any chosen nominee... gee, I wonder? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RDANGELO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Diversity insecurity.
Edited on Sat May-30-09 09:07 AM by RDANGELO
There is a substantial segment of the the population that is insecure with the fact that the US is a diverse nation. Most of them are Republicans. They want to see an America that looks and acts like them. Anything that promotes the notion of diversify begets a paranoid reaction - lashing out.

Hence you have the reaction to one sentence from Sotomayor, the insistence that America is a Christian Nation ,whatever that means,and the obsession with affirmative action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. Just one more example of RW projection. They ALWAYS call liberals
those things that they know themselves to be, as a means of insulating themselves from legitimate charges of things like, in this case, racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. Can Mrs. Alito sit behind Sotomayor when the judge testifies before the Senate?
Edited on Sat May-30-09 10:53 AM by TexasObserver
Can she turn on her tears and cry for this nominee?


This is one more reason why I hate the GOP. They are not only racists, but they are so racist they think anyone who doesn't agree with them is racist. Why don't they just call themselves the White Christian Wall Street Party and be done with it?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC