Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

conservative columnist: I was wrong about Sotomayor speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:49 PM
Original message
conservative columnist: I was wrong about Sotomayor speech
he had previously excerpted the small part of the speech and asked, "how is this not racist?"

http://dallasmorningviewsblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2009/05/i-was-wrong-abo.html

The NYT has a link to the entire speech in which she made the comment about the "wise Latina" reaching a "better" verdict than "a white male who hasn't lived that life." I'm still a bit troubled by the remark, but not in any important way. Taken in context, the speech was about how the context in which we were raised affects how judges see the world, and that it's unrealistic to pretend otherwise. Yet -- and this is a key point -- she admits that as a jurist, one is obligated to strive for neutrality. It seems to me that Judge Sotomayor in this speech dwelled on the inescapability of social context in shaping the character of a jurist. That doesn't seem to me to be a controversial point, and I am relieved by this passage:

While recognizing the potential effect of individual experiences on perception, Judge Cedarbaum nevertheless believes that judges must transcend their personal sympathies and prejudices and aspire to achieve a greater degree of fairness and integrity based on the reason of law. Although I agree with and attempt to work toward Judge Cedarbaum's aspiration, I wonder whether achieving that goal is possible in all or even in most cases.


Relieved, because it strikes me as both idealistic and realistic. I am sure Sotomayor and I have very different views on the justice, or injustice, of affirmative action, but seeing her controversial comment in its larger context makes it look a lot less provocative and troubling. As some of you have noted in comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too bad Clarence Thomas turned traitor on poor minorities..
.. even though he only made it through
affirmative action and liberal social
programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whatever. Anybody with half a non-racist brain realizes upon reading the whole thing...
That there's nothing wrong with what she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Exactly. She is being realistic. We all carry some biases with us
every day, and any decisions we make may or may not have the influence of our personal experiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Justice Is Founded in Truth, or It Isn't Justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Must have read this DU post earlier today...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good on him for taking a second look and admitting his misunderstanding. Many DUers,
myself included, could learn a good lesson or two on that at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. I was raised in New Mexico...
Edited on Wed May-27-09 07:59 PM by liberalmuse
I knew what the fuck she meant without having to read the entire text. Shit. I think people who were raised in New Jersey even get it. The Republicans are so transparent. They've really blown their game. Anyone who isn't a total fuckwit can see right through them. (disclaimer: no apologies towards the 24% who are indeed, total fuckwits, were even minimally intended.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC