Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Serving on a Jury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:50 PM
Original message
Poll question: Serving on a Jury
Edited on Wed May-27-09 05:51 PM by Mike 03
This poll is intended only for persons who have served on a jury. It was composed rather quickly, and I am sure I have left out important elements, for which I apologize in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Called to serve every year since age 21...
And have never, ever once been chosen to sit on a jury. Never. Weird, huh?

I'm smart, well-groomed, well-spoken, don't have bad breath or rotten teeth... and I'm really kinda cute! I don't know what the deal is!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Lucky you. I have served on one jury trial and look to be ...
tagged again.

Maybe THIS TIME I should exclaim to the defense attorney during the selection process, "Where's the guilty bastard?!?" :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Hey! That's my trick!
Hahaha! I kid...

The only time I got off the hook and knew the reason why was a rape case... the judge asked if anyone knew anyone who had been raped... well, yes, yes I do. When I was 17 my best friend was raped by her uncle... good-bye Ms. June... thanks for coming! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Never been called to serve nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Called to serve on a federal grand jury.
Our job was not to convict but to determine whether there was sufficient grounds to indict. We sat one day a month for 18 months. Each time we sat, we heard at least three different cases. Our grand jury was seldom unanimous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPedigrees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. I was part of a sequestered jury, sitting on a murder trial that lasted 2 weeks.
Edited on Wed May-27-09 06:02 PM by SPedigrees
We acquitted the defendant.

I sat on other juries, but they were less memorable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. I sat on a jury (as foreperson) where there was
intelligent and reasoned discussion of a clearly presented case and one juror disagreed with the remaining 11 jurors for reasons that had nothing to do with the law or even the case at hand - she freely admitted that she 'didn't care' about the facts because she believed that even if the defendant wasn't guilty of the crime with which he was charged, he was undoubtedly guilty of something else.

I am somewhat embarrassed to admit that we ultimately strong-armed the hold-out to change her vote. Verbally strong-armed, not physically.

I have also sat on a jury that reached a unanimous verdict in less than an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Served but they settled before it went to the jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. I've yet to be seated
and probably never will, unless the right sort of case comes along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sat on a murder trial...a very heinous one.
Found the defendant guilty of second degree murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Selected for the jury, but
before the jury made it into the court room, a plea agreement was worked out. We were held at the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. Mistrial. Yappy cop blew what looked like a slam-dunk conviction.
Rookie didn't know when to stop talking, judge called a mistrial. Senior detectives present weren't too pleased with his performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. I was the Foreman and we had complete agreement within 2 hours
On a case of multiple counts of incest and rape we were in complete agreement from the first moment that the fellow was guilt but it was clear to three of us that of the dozen and a half charges (don't remember the exact number now) there was one instance in which if he was guilty of one he could not be of the other. We weren't sure which one he didn't do but we were damned certain that he had done one or both of the crimes so it was pretty much a coin toss. We actually discussed this one small point for close to two hours, not in disagreement but just trying to make sure we were damned certain about our agreement - that we weren't just being carried away by the moment if you want to think about it that way. Anyway after we had sorted out that one seeming discrepancy by giving a not-guilty on one charge we were then speaking as one voice with the remaining guilty verdicts. The Defense Attorney had the Judge poll us as well, and each of us individually answered that we agreed with the verdicts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Your answers are most appreciated and give me hope that my case was just a fluke.
Edited on Wed May-27-09 07:00 PM by Mike 03
We had total disagreement.

I felt there were people on this jury who had just ignored the most important testimony.

It was a nightmare.

But I think it is crucial that people serve on juries as required.

Thank you so much for your input! It is impossible not to admire the tenacity and opinions put forth here by those participating in this thread.



:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is this a poll for criminal cases? Because in a civil case (only jury duty I've done)
you don't have guilt or acquittal, you either find for the plaintiff or the defendant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuppyBismark Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. He was guilty, but we found him innocent because the DA was incompetent
We got back to the jury room and quickly decided the DA did not prove his case, but most of us thought we could have. However, given the case presented, we had to let him go. The case involved stealing something and covering it up. BTW: the cop on the case was just as bad as the DA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. A rather fascinating "he said, she said" civil case.
It involved an accident where she was suing for extensive injuries and a pot of money.

She and her lawyer made it all too obvious that the "extensive" injuries were a matter of imagination more than substance.

She "won" and we awarded her $1.00.

I have a feeling her lawyer probably sued her for non-payment of his fee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hung jury - little intelligent discussion - bailiff had to break it up twice
the 2 loudmouth bloviators of the bunch both got arrested a few weeks later taking turns vandalizing each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC