Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do you think of Dr Chu's idea of painting the roofs white?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:42 PM
Original message
What do you think of Dr Chu's idea of painting the roofs white?
Should it be mandatory? Could we start with all commercial buildings first? How about all new construction? Government buildings? This would keep houses cooler in the winter . . . but potentially this could offset all global warming from what I read (if ALL buildings complied). What about other countries? Would it also be helpful if even the rest of the exterior of the house was painted white or a light color? Seems like it would. Thoughts? Suggestions? Further information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its a great idea!
I get to still drive my gas guzzler, eat my beef, and enjoy my products of mass industry, and I get to feel cushy about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. My understanding is that it would only offset things at current levels
but as long as the gas guzzling goes on, etc., it will increase levels so we still need to fix that problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. ah, too bad.
white isnt even my color
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Solar panels instead.....
Edited on Wed May-27-09 02:46 PM by LeftHander
The rooftops of America are a vast solar panel goldmine waiting to be tapped.

Soon solar panels will be "painted on"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I hear what you're saying as far as alternative energy sources
Edited on Wed May-27-09 02:52 PM by The Hope Mobile
but the white roof suggestion is about reflecting back the heat to decrease global warming from what I understand. Maybe they could do a combination of both. Solar panels are by nature dark, correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yes, this
Makes much more sense than paint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. What about saying people must do one or the other?
They serve different purposes, correct??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
33. Doing either costs money that people MAY not have
I generally don't believe in mandatory retrofit requirements on peoples' homes.

For new construction, I would have no problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I understand that - I wouldn't be able to afford either one probably.
Definitely not solar though I'd like to but maybe the government could pay for it. I'm wondering if it might actually be cheaper for them than some other solutions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Who said mandatory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. The Hope Mobile in the subject line of reply #16
What about saying people must do one or the other?

Underlining added for emphasis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #41
54. Right, I was asking how people felt about that possibility. Not saying that
Edited on Wed May-27-09 06:48 PM by The Hope Mobile
it had to happen. I probably should've been more clear but the whole point of the OP was to get opinions, thoughts, suggestions, etc..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
56. I don't know if this is part of the thinking, but
The first thing that I thought of upon reading the original post was that if all roofs in the country wer white, this would, at least partly, cancel out the loss of the albedo affect in the arctic regions.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #56
74. I think that's exactly what they're thinking. nt
I'm curious if changing the location of the white patches will have an impact of any kind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #74
90. Would a natural metal (unpainted) roof
have the same effect. We had one before we moved here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #90
96. I don't know enough about it to know if that would be equally or maybe
even more effective?!?!? Good question though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. We won't solve this problem with 1 big answer but with a lot of little answers.
This is one of those little answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. According to them its a big answer but I agree it will obviously have to be
a great combination of things. I think this is the beginning of thinking outside the old box and creating a whole new environmental paradigm IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:54 PM
Original message
Exactly!
And this one goes a long way to save energy in the summer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
targetpractice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Right... It's like how McDonald's can save millions...
.... by putting ketchup packets behind the counter or installing those annoying new napkin dispensers. Or, how UPS, FedEX, General Motors, etc. save millions through time-motion studies.

Little changes implemented across the board on a massive scale result in real efficiencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Exactly! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Vegetation
Alternately, we could require a certain amount of vegetation. It would absorb some of the light, and use it to extract carbon from the environment. This would be effective in northern climes where in the winter, the vegetation would give way to solar absorption to improve heating efficiencies there by reducing carbon based fuels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Require people to plant large gardens on their roofs. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Reduce the amount of pavement that is visible from the sky.
Which absorbs the heat as more and more pavement is created.

How could we get increased vegetation to offset pavement?

Can we change the way pavement is constructed to reduce absorption rate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. They suggested concrete instead of asphalt. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
44. Many cities already have a "free tree" program
Edited on Wed May-27-09 03:30 PM by XemaSab
to reduce heating and cooling costs.

I like the idea of rooftop vegetation, but I'm not sure how well it would work in arid areas. :shrug:

SMUD:

http://www.smud.org/en/residential/trees/Pages/index.aspx

LADWP:

http://www.ladwp.com/ladwp/cms/ladwp000744.jsp

Glendale Water and Power:

http://www.glendalewaterandpower.com/save_money/residential/tree_power.aspx

And so forth...

I'm all in favor of this program. It creates habitat, saves energy, makes the streets beautiful, and increases property values. A big win all around. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a la izquierda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
67. I actually saw a PlanetGreen program about
something like this. Companies who owned tall buildings with flat roofs planted gardens on top (including restaurants, and from these gardens they got some of their produce).
I think this is a fabulous idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. It doesn't even have to be white.
White is best, but even light shades of grey and beige are fine. We simply need to get away from the model of having black, slate, or dark brown roofs.

My house has a concrete tile roof in a light tan color. It looks pretty spiffy, and it does an awesome job of keeping the house cooler. We saw a 15 degree drop in attic temps when we put them on in place of our old black asphalt shingle roof (we can actually store stuff up there now without it melting, which is saying something since it hits 110 degrees here in the summer sun.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. It will look like crap in Santa Barbara. The buildings here resemble missions with red tile roofs.
Edited on Wed May-27-09 02:57 PM by county worker
I don't believe in forcing everyone to do something like that.

I think that my thoughts will not be popular in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. There could be exceptions.
Historic buildings, for example.

Or, for aesthetic purposes, as in the case of Santa Barbara.

However, such exceptions could be accompanied by offsetting measures, ie solar installations in strategic locations that offset the climate change mitigation that the white roofs would have effected.

Now see, that wasn't hard; I didn't need to flame!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. That's what I was talking about. And couldn't this possibly be a much
cheaper solution than many others??

I'd rather not paint my roof. I like the color it is. But they could make it mandatory . . . and they could pay for it especially for those that can't afford to.

But I understand not wanting to for other reasons . . .and maybe the alternative could be then mandatory solar panels somewhere on your property!?!? Just thinking out loud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. First, I doubt that Chu ever meant to imply that it should become retroactively mandatory.
But they could institute greener national building codes.

California is the lowest per capita user of electricity, largely because of our building codes.

As to the cost, yes, I think we could help out with a Federal assistance program with grants and/or low interest loans.

Your ideas for alternatives are valid, many are doable now and include any number of ways to offset your carbon footprint.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Aesthetically it might be a disaster. What about strongly suggesting
that people either put solar panels on their roof or paint white? What about requiring all new construction, commercial and government buildings to do it first as a way to demonstrate the effectiveness??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
40. Such regulations are in fact coming in inh California.
...this summer; so we will have data soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
64. "... to demonstrate the effectiveness" ???
I think people who wear black shirts in summer know how effective it is.

Although, I agree with having an option (solar panels or white paint) and requiring new construction and government buildings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #64
73. I know that light colors reflect back sun/heat. I meant the effectiveness
in terms of how much difference (maybe a percentage or a degree of temperature change) that changing those original rooftops makes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #73
85. It would create jobs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
45. Forcing no, opening one's mind
That maybe red is not fashionable anymore, yes. Light tan looks really nice too. My personal favorites are green or blue.

Dealing with global warming is like dealing with smallpox. We just need to do what is best to keep us alive. If a shot in the arm is it, we need to campaign for the bright idea. Pretty soon, most folks will be okay with it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Mine is already light brown asphalt tile
Edited on Wed May-27-09 02:51 PM by slackmaster
It's roughly the color of native soil in the area. Any kind of paint would flake off and make a chronic mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder what the carbon footprint
of creating all that new white paint will be? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. LOL good thought nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Mr kt is reading a book right now called The Necessary Revolution by Peter Senge.
This idea is in there. It will take many things to turn the environment around, but it can be done. If we owened the property we live in, we would certainly do this, along with composting, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. With solar panels. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Could we start with appropriate first?
It might be a great idea in Phoenix, but not so great in Detroit. If anything should be mandatory, it should be thinking. That's what architects get paid to do -- think about how design and function go together. What should have been learned from cookie-cutter developments is that what is cheap and easy to knock out is not necessarily energy efficient in the long run. For that, someone has to actually think about the best way to minimize energy inputs and maximize renewable energy potential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. But as a short term and nearly immediate fix, does this make sense to you?
Its not a cure. It doesn't make the problem go away but maybe as the beginning to really thinking outside the box? We can't reverse time and do things over but we do need to put an immediate halt on what's already happened and then rethink everything we've done to this point?!?! IMHO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
48. Still inside the box
This is a well known trick in the southwest. I even did it 5 years ago on a house I rehabbed in Las Vegas. Yes, if you could get people in CA, NV, AZ, NM, and other sunny places who haven't slopped some Black Jack on the roof to do so, it could invigorate the economy. That's part of the problem with the housing bust; nobody in a foreclosed house is going to want to invest in an energy saving improvement, the cost of which takes a few years to recoup.
For those of you who do, here's the link: http://www.lowes.com/lowes/lkn?action=productDetail&productId=139941-29-5530-1-30&lpage=none
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. They better repave the black top roads too
They emit so much heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. My undestanding was that that was part of the suggestion.
Resurfacing with concrete instead of asphalt. Or maybe some new product? Agreed that it also causes a lot of heat to be absorbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fountain79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #24
75. Wouldn't white roads....
reflect too much light? It would seem that they would be hard to look at on a sunny day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #75
78. Hopefully people would be waering sunglasses anyway. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
25. That sounds like Socialism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
93. Roof painting is socialism?
Joke?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. Ever read "The Giver"
In any case, alot of the book has to do with mandatory sameness and this is what it reminds me of. It isn't a good thing btw...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. White roofs will not cripple imagination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
94. Driven through the 'burbs lately/ever?
Until I lived in Phoenix, I had no idea that there were so many shades of beige.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. Paint is not a good solution - why not just encourage people to select better options
Than dark asphalt shingles, which seems to have been popular in the last ten or twenty years in some areas. Paint is just not going to last on asphalt shingles, which shed the gravel coat as they age.

When we got our double wide mobile home, it had dark brown shingles. One of the first improvements we made was to add blown insulation in the limited "attic" space. That helped keep the house a little cooler but the ceilings still got hot. We planted trees and shrubs to shade the house - that helped a lot since we went from getting sun an average of eight hours a day or more to direct sun on a part of the roof for just a couple of hours a day. But then we changed the roof to painted metal panels - that made more difference than the insulation had and almost as much difference as the shade.

I see so many Florida homes with no shade and with dark color shingles - how stupid! Strategic shade makes the biggest difference and a lighter color material can help.

Why not encourage covering those sun catching roofs with solar panels or solar shingles? That will reduce the heat gain for the building AND generate electricity. If every home that suffers from heat gain installed some sort of solar energy system,

Solar Shingles http://www.thisoldhouse.com/toh/article/0,,1205726,00.html

Catching Some Rays: Solar Shingles Can Turn Your Rooftop into a Miniature Power Plant http://www.emagazine.com/view/?851

http://www.millionsolarroofs.org/solarshingles.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
34. When I was a teenager I tried to paint my ceiling white
A lot. I mean a whole bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. . . .
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. paint does not adhere to asphalt shingles well
rather, the choice should be to build new or re-roof with light grey shingles - no additional cost. which are an aesthetic disaster IMHO as an architect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. Why a disaster? Light roofs look fine with many houses. When house
needs repainting or a new roof than light colors can be used. Not necessarily white but lighter colors will absorb less heat. There is nothing much hotter than black pavement in Las Vegas in late July or August. If the pavement were lighter in color it would help. No one thing will do it all but a series of smaller steps will help make life a bit cooler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
42. How about only allowing light-colored shingles to be sold?
And as far as tar roofs go, painting THOSE white?

My roof is already light gray, so I don't think painting it would do much. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
47. Other countries are already doing it
but then, they have governments which actually work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. As someone who has a white roof and lives in AZ
I can tell you that white elastomeric coatings absolutely work. My house is much cooler in the intense heat we have here.
One other benefit from the white roof is helping to keep the nights cooler. If the roof doesn't soak up heat during the day it doesn't give it off at night either, keeping it cooler in the evening. Phoenix is a huge 'heat island' and that effects the amount of rain we get from our summer monsoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
50. We put on a white rubber roof to our flat roofed house in 2002 and it made a big difference.
When we moved in the roof was black but painted silver w a special paint for reflection. It need re-painting but also had some leaking problems. This new roof cost more than my husband's 1st house ($38,000) but we haven't had any issues and we hardly ever use air con (we use the fly wheel effect of opening windows at night & closing up the house during the day-besides having many mature trees)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
51. How about "Living Roofs"
Living Roofs are the way to go for flat surfaced roofs.




You seem to have left out black asphalt parking lots, which generate a lot of heat, and they could be painted white.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #51
61. The glare would be hard on the eyes, wouldn't it, with all that white
at street level?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
52. I don't know if that is a good idea in colder regions of the country
We hardly ever run AC in our house -- maybe two weeks out of the entire summer. But in Winter.... we do use the furnace.

We get lots of snow and it is cold for many months out of the year.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pubslayer Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. science will solve the aesthetic issue
I read about some shingles in development that have a special surface that can deflect heat, but appear brown or red or dark grey etc. I think the selected wavelength was reflected at an angle, while everything else was reflected straight back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Welcome to DU! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. snow covered roofs are white
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #57
76. but usually only part of the year.
That's the idea, from what I understand it. This is meant to replace the snow (which has been retreating) in its reflection of the heat. As the snow melts from other causes of global warming, it gets accelerated by the fact that there's less snow to reflect back the heat. White rooftops would take over that job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #52
62. maybe a while plastic tarp for summer months would be best
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
58. Terrible idea.
The alien invaders might take it as a sign of surrender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. snarf
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
60. It's based on science isn't it?
Edited on Thu May-28-09 02:37 AM by ColbertWatcher
All we need to do is find a way to make it work.

All reasonable ideas should be considered.

20 years ago, if you told a Regular American that we could get energy from waves, they would laugh or dismiss it without a thought.

Now, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_power">we know better.

It would be interesting if we made all man-made government-owned surfaces lighter colors including roads.

Here is a section of Highway 71 after the 60 interchange where it changes from concrete to asphalt ...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
63. From the guy that killed funding for establishing the early groundwork for a hydrogen economy...
...this is just as hair-brained. So amazingly sad for someone as well-educated and knowledgeable as Dr. Chu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndersDame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
65. Metal Roofing!
Affordable, recyclable, and energy efficient
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
66. Already have done it
Edited on Thu May-28-09 06:40 AM by quaker bill
two weeks ago. The white coating is on top of a new urethane foam roof. I got the equivalent of R-14+. I live in FL and the air conditioner barely runs anymore. It is a great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
68. I think it makes total sense..
... if you live in the southern US, or anywhere with mild winters.

I have always wondered my more roofs are not light colored. Appears to be completely cosmetic.

It will make a big difference. In fact, if you were going to paint, why not use that special radiant barrier paint. Would work even better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
69. Doesn't Make Sense In The North
In the north, in latitudes where snowfall occurs frequently, you need a dark roof to absorb sunlight and help melt the snow. A sharply pitched roof and dark shingles are necessities. If the snow builds up too much, you have major problems!

I have a house in the NE and a house in GA. The GA house is built specially to have very low cooling costs, and it does cost about 50% less than the average house of that size. It is also positioned so that in the winter it will get a lot of passive solar effect, so the winter heating bill is minimal. And the roof is light, the house is painted lightly. The major cost there is AC.

The house in the NE has major shade and a dark roof. It does not need to be air conditioned, and in the winter the foliage drops and the dark roof helps to absorb heat and lessen heating costs. The major cost there is heating.

Frankly, I thought Chu's proposal was pretty inane.

Low environmental impact building varies according to the local climate. Those red pitched tile roofs in some areas are used because they are exceedingly fire resistant. You might be able to use lighter tiles, but they would probably darken over time, and the cost of rebuilding would use far more energy than energy saved from different types of roofing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #69
80. Welcome to DU nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #80
99. Thanks for the welcome
But it feels weird. I've been around forever - at least since 2004. I was just too shy to register and comment. But the recent round of screaming convinced me that some of the shy, quiet, boring middle-aged types might be needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #99
101. I'm one of those types myself. I've actually been around since 2001
and started posting then but just barely. I rejoined the posting crowd last year and only passed 1000 posts recently. Its been a great place to be even with the infighting. Its a great source of information and discussion as long as you can be objective about the passionate craziness that occurs sometimes. Welcome onboard more officially from one boring middle-aged type to another :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #69
89. It really doesn't work that way in northern climes
I have a black shingle roof and once a winter, I need to go up on the roof to shovel as much snow off as I can because it can get quite deep. This is done to prevent the weight of the snow from collapsing the roof in. I also think one really doesn't want snow melting off the roof in the winter as large icicles can form on the roof edge and I've seen homes where the heat loss was so bad, the wall of the home was covered by a sheet of ice from the roof to the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #69
91. This is a good example of how personal evaluations miss the point of the proposal
Edited on Fri May-29-09 12:40 AM by kristopher
The idea is that global warming is a threat and expected to get worse at an unknown rate due to the "cascade" effect where the original cause of global warming (manmade CO2 and other greenhouse gas) give rise to other problems that hurry the process along. In this case, the energy issue is one factor, but it isn't the main one. The idea is that with the melting of ice in the northern latitudes there has been a change in the overall reflectivity of the Earth, with the darker soil absorbing heat instead of ice reflecting it.

Theoretically, by making as much of the man-made surface area white as possible, we can partially offset the shift in the balance of reflectivity of the planet.

The further north you go, the less light is reflected because the angle the light is striking the surface at becomes closer to horizontal. However, even with that consideration the northern rooftops could make a significant contribution to this goal.

Your argument makes clear that a comprehensive analysis of the tradeoff between GHG savings due to efficient use of solar for heating and the change in reflectivey would need to guide the decision process.

Good post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #91
98. Right now, ice coverage extent is flat to growing.
Seriously. The website I used to use is gone now, because one of the satellites has developed sensor problems, but although Arctic average ice extent has lost a bit, Antarctic ice extent has expanded considerably.
http://www.physorg.com/news159528096.html

Currently we are close to the 30 year ave. If anything, the albedo effect in the southern hemisphere ought to be higher, because it is the one closest to the sun.

So the albedo effect of diminishing snow/ice is not going to be significant at this time, and in any case, the albedo effect (as the term is usually used in relation to global temps) is less significant where you have concentrations of housing (with white or dark roofing), because those tend to be in more humid, polluted urban areas. Heat radiated up off a white roof would tend to be captured and retained by higher GHG concentrations and inversion layers in the lower atmosphere over an urban area. In a desert/low density area I would think more would get back through into the upper atmosphere and radiate on out. I know just irrigation of semi-arid cropland in the US raises night time temperatures by several degrees in some US areas, so the UHI effect is significant.

So I think the main idea is to reduce energy consumption, which would have a positive effect.

And light roofs in some areas do massively change heat absorption and do cut down on energy usage quite significantly. Conservation is very important if you want to reduce environmental impacts. In denser housing areas, the ambient temps might be reduced at least by a couple of degrees if all roofing were light. Not that this would affect global temperatures, but it would help to conserve energy.

I have to say I wonder why solar panels wouldn't do more overall to help, since the areas in which the most heat is absorbed by dark roofs (or repelled by light ones) are the areas in which solar panels are most effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #98
100. Really?
You are stating that decreasing sea ice isn't a factor to consider? The entire exercise in white surfaces has its origins in the changing albedo. I'm not going to bother tracking down a source, but it has been an ongoing discussion in the Energy/Environment forum at DU for some time now.

Here is what the actual study says:

<2>...Since the 1970s the two polar regions have experienced markedly different trends in sea ice extent (SIE) (Figure 1). In the Arctic, late summer ice reached record minima in 2005 and 2007, with the ice in September 2007 covering only 4.1 × 10^6 km2, which was 39% below climatology. In contrast, Antarctic SIE has actually increased over the same period. Zwally et al. <2002> showed that over 1979–1998 the SIE had increased by 11.2 ± 4.2 × 10^3 km2 yr−1 or 0.98 ± 0.37% dec−1.

<22> The realistic simulation of sea ice in coupled climate models is a major challenge and the AR4 models exhibit a very large range of skills in reproducing recent SIE changes. However, the weighted ensemble ice extents do show a small, non-significant increase in autumn in the Ross Sea sector. Projections of the climate for the rest of this century using the AR4 models suggest a large decrease (approximately 30%) in Antarctic sea ice by 2100 as stratospheric ozone levels recover but greenhouse gas concentrations rise. We can therefore expect to see a gradual slow down in the rate of increase of SIE before the reduction takes place later in the century. Many of the models used within the AR4 exercise incorporate an estimated recovery of stratospheric ozone amounts during the spring, with the ozone hole recovering by the second half of the century. This would tend to reduce the wind speeds around the continent and presumably result in a reversal of the trends in SIE that we have examined here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
70. It's a good starting point, something that can be done immediately
for a number of buildings, while we get better infrastructure in place for better roofs, such as green roofs.

Green roofs actually can't be placed on any flat-roofed building - you have to have a particular type of roof construction that will support the extra weight of the soil. I know because my company looked into it as a suggestion for our leaky roof that the landlord just doesn't want to fix, but the roof type won't hold a green roof. It's a horrible black roof now. My suggestion is to at least put down light-colored gravel - it would both reflect heat and serve as a potential nest site for Common Nighthawks! I can foresee a future requirement for all new builds with flat roofs to incorporate some form of green roof.

My mechanic is building a new auto-body shop down the street and they're putting in a green roof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #70
77. It seems like even black tarps that cover mounds of raw materials
should really be white. Covers for stadiums?? In California most schools have flat rooftops. Those could either have solar, white or green tops. Most states could do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
71. make them metal first, then paint 'em white nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
72. Has anyone seen any estimate of the actual effect?
Either "watts reflected back upward", "degrees lower in a building in summer", "kWh saved" or anything, really - for one house, building, city etc.? And at what latitude?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #72
79. No but I was wondering the same thing. And DOES latitude make a difference?
It seems like it would but I wasn't sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #79
83. As Yo_Mama says above, you'd think it would
The strength of the sun, the angle, and the cloud cover might all affect it; and there is the thing Yo_Mama brought up about whether a darker roof actually helps warm up a house in a cold winter.

In southern Europe, white is a traditional colour for walls of houses, to keep them cool in summer; but northern Europe doesn't really bother with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #83
87. I think I responded to her after I responded to you.
I understand the idea of white in warmer climes completely but I think that whiter houses have two different functions.

1. To keep a home cooler which has positives and negatives depending on where you live.
2. To reflect back the amount of heat absorbed normally in an area. This is the one that I find more complex/interesting.
Most snow is at the poles. Would white rooftops closer to the equator reflect back heat in the same way or to varying degrees depending on the latitude. Would the amount of heat reflected back by white rooftops in cooler climes be beneficial to reducing the amount of heat reflected back in a way that outweighs the increased cost and need to increased heating of the interior of homes in those areas or is it a wash there? Could there be temporary rooftops/tarps put over homes in the summer in those areas that could be removed in the winter? Could there be any environmental impact on perhaps insects, birds, some other wildlife, foliage in areas where white rooftops are implemented?

I'm not sure why but I find this whole concept fascinating.

I paid a lot of attention to white rooftops yesterday here in So Cal and its really not unappealing like I thought it would be.
I would definitely like to start with commercial, government buildings first and all new construction to get a gauge on what the degree of impact would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
81. not after Labor Day! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #81
88. LOL!! Houses need to follow the rules of fashion too! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
82. I think it makes sense.
Edited on Thu May-28-09 10:33 AM by bamacrat
We are losing shitloads of ice from our poles which are white, which reflects solar rays back to space. Why not paint all federal buildings roofs white then anyone else who wanted to could, it would make a cool looking satelite photo too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
84. It's the most ridiculous idea I've ever heard
I think he's overestimating any benefits by at least half. Once it gets dark out, the roof will be black again.

Wouldn't it be better to just have all the white people walk around naked to reflect sunlight?


Besides, 2/3 of the earth's surface is blue water - should we paint that white too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fountain79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-28-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
86. How would you be certain roads have been plowed well enough? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
92. Tubular solar PV and white roofs are a match
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
95. Instead of spending all our money on wars, the military, and bailouts,
we should buy solar panels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. Absolutely!! Nothing could be more true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC