Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Sen. HAtch is offended by something Sotomayor wrote in 1996, why did he vote for her nom in 1998?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 05:23 PM
Original message
If Sen. HAtch is offended by something Sotomayor wrote in 1996, why did he vote for her nom in 1998?
:shrug:

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/05/hatch-im-now-concerned-about-things-sotomayor-wrote-before-i-supported-her-last-time.php
Video at link~

Hatch: I'm Now Concerned About Things Sotomayor Wrote Before I Supported Her Last Time
By Brian Beutler - May 26, 2009, 4:06PM


Earlier today, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) called in to MSNBC to raise concerns about a judge whom he's supported twice.

Hatch cites, among other things, an article Sotomayor wrote in 1996--two years before he supported her confirmation to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. But, he says, the Supreme Court is a different thing altogether.

As a senior, and influential, member of the Judiciary Committee, Hatch will have significant sway over how quickly and smoothly the coming confirmation process moves forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. cause like most politicians, he has a selective memory...especially rethuglicons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because he is a HYPOCRITE with situational ethics. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Situational ethics. That's a perfect description! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Youtube did not yet exist.
nobody was ever going to find out--then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Stop making sense!
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC