Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is no Catholic quota for the Supreme Court, and it's sad some on DU seem to want one.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:07 PM
Original message
There is no Catholic quota for the Supreme Court, and it's sad some on DU seem to want one.
Amazing that this even comes up, but there have been a few posts regarding how many Catholics will be on the court if our current nominee is confirmed. None of the current Catholic justices or the current nominee call The Vatican to find out how to vote. There is no reason to oppose or have concern for a judge other office holder based on this. There are of course political reasons to vote against or oppose someone of my faith for office, as individuals we are as varied as Ted Kennedy to Rick Santorum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hating on Catholics is a favorite past time here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hating on religion in general, often times...
Though the current Pope is arguably an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Oh yeah, I hate the current Pope
I just don't extend that to most Catholics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. A lot of American Catholics are "cafeteria Catholics"
and, despite my feelings about religion, I don't dislike them for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yep, most Catholics I know are pro-gay marriage, pro-choice, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I loathe the Church, but don't blame people for it.
My father and I were talking about Hispanics a couple of weeks ago and generally agree that they tend to be really good people overall. They're almost universally Catholic. His girlfriend (a great example of ignorance in many ways) knew ONE that she didn't like, so she dislikes them all equally. My dad loves her, but I'll never understand why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. and generally anti death penality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDFbunny Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. Or "twice a year" Catholics. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. Islam seems to avoid this fate.
Odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Maybe because the only obnoxious Islamic folks we know about
are "terra-ists" and nobody here actually considers them a valid interpretation of their faith. Judaism gets a pass too, for the most part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #33
70. Not really
If you're not seeing Islam-bashing on DU, you must spend lots of time in the cooking forum.

But there IS more Christian-bashing, and the reasons for that are pretty simple... No matter what the right wing keeps trying to tell us, it's not the Muslims who are trying to convert our society into a theocratic hellhole. It's the christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #70
81. You may be receiving a sternly-worded letter from Opus Dei, you know.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. I hope so!
It might help me cut back on my bath tissue costs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. And some of the people doing this sort of thing will be the first to complain
Edited on Tue May-26-09 03:24 PM by Renew Deal
if their favored group is "hated on".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. What does that mean?
I would love an explanation. It would be nice to see you backpedal twice today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. It wasn't aimed at you.
I agree with you that bashing catholics/religion is common on DU. What I'm saying is that there are people here that will ridicule one group of people while getting upset that their favored group is ridiculed. They consider it OK to bash religion, but not race. Or they consider it acceptable to bash gays, but not religion. Or name your combination...

I'm not sure what you mean by backpedal. I haven't had a controversial day at all. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Sorry, I figured you were calling out members of a certain group
As for the rest, I saw your grave dancing thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Oh
I noticed it was deleted. It wasn't grave dancing. I'm surprised no one else had pointed it out...or maybe they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Oddly enough, the atheists/skeptics here annoy me the most...
The religious folks are generally decent, open-minded people. The atheist/skeptics think my wife is just as nutty as any fundie asshole. That doesn't win them any points with ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
60. Amusing how in complaining about a broad brush being used..
You break out a rather broad brush of your own.

Atheists/skeptics are as diverse in personalities as any other group.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #60
75. Show me where I said ALL...
In general, most of the theists around here are pretty damn tolerant. They don't use words like "woo" to describe people they don't agree with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. Umm...
Your words verbatim:

Oddly enough, the atheists/skeptics here annoy me the most

I see no qualifications on this statement at all.

If you didn't mean *all* then you would have written "some" or "a few" or something similar which would have indicated you didn't mean all.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
59. And it's the one aspect of DU that I really bothers me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Perhaps, but how about an Opus Dei quota?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone who puts thier religion equal to or above the rule of law should not serve on any bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. B.I.N.G.O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
49. There you have it
If your religion colors your judgement, you have no business being on the bench.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Some on DU are disrupters
and sound more like freepers than freepers half the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. There are odd similarities, when you factor in differences in ideology.
Some people are okay with just about anything as long as they can rationalize it and it's being done by people THEY support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Ideologues and extremists generally have more in common than not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. I for one would love to see a social moderate Catholic on the court
standing up to the theocratic Opus Dei types like Scalia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Well, you're about to get what you want! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. We Catholics don't lift a finger without the Pope's blessing. All kidding aside...
Edited on Tue May-26-09 02:13 PM by onehandle
I expect a fundie explosion pretty soon.

They HATE Catholics.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Yah, except for abortion issues. Then the fundies LOVE 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. They sure hate Catholic values
Protecting the vulnerable, social justice, peace... I could go on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. May I point out that the values you list are HUMANIST values and the Catholic church
does not have any corner on them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #37
69. Since when does anyone have a 'corner' on values?
:shrug:

These are values that I as a Catholic find an important part of my faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #69
80. They are fundamental values shared by humanists --
Edited on Wed May-27-09 09:54 AM by Sal Minella
This is your post:

==============================
They sure hate Catholic values -- Protecting the vulnerable, social justice, peace... I could go on.
==============================

You make it sound like catholics invented them, imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
63. Well, everyone knows they keep canons in their churches,
ready to take over the world at a moment's notice. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
86. A decade and a half ago that was true, but not anymore
Many of the prominent fundie figures are Catholic. They're trying to get religious Jews on board too but it's not working as well as they had hoped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Would be nice to have an atheist representing.
Not arguing for any quotas, but just saying.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnrepentantUnitarian Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. A true free-thinker these days wouldn't stand a chance!
Edited on Tue May-26-09 02:38 PM by UnrepentantUnitarian
It does seem odd, however, that as the nation turns more and more pluralistic and personalized (nonconformist and/or secular) in religious beliefs -- as shown in several recent surveys -- there is any one faith-tradition which can dominate the highest court in the land. (Oh, and by the way, Justice Stevens is likely to be leaving before long...what then?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
45. Overqualified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Link please? -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. Wow, this is one I never expected
I can't believe anyone is objecting on religious grounds. Do we even know if she is religious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Some people can't separate the Vatican with
Edited on Tue May-26-09 03:09 PM by calico1
every day, common people who were raised as Catholics.

To imply that every Catholic doesn't think without consulting the Pope, that we all go to Mass every day and carry our rosary beads everywhere, etc. is like saying that all Protestants are fundies.

How many people here were brought up Protestant? Would you like to be thrown in with fundy wing nuts and be considered the same as them? That's what you do when you generalize about Catholics.

Don't forget that some of the most Liberal people in Congress (Biden, Kennedy, Kucinich, etc) are Catholic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Not to worry, I don't forget
I just took a nap and woke up to a DU crawling with anti-Catholic screed. I think the nomination is terrific! I'm an atheist. I don't care what religion anybody is. It's a personal matter :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. You may consider religious matters personal, but Holy Mother Church does not.
I would agree with you if it weren't for....

...the Church's threats of excommunication against pro-choice Catholic politicians before the last election. Holy Mother Church takes public policy matters very seriously indeed, it seems, not leaving them to the whims or personal beliefs of individual Catholics.

...the refusal of Pope Benedict to accept Caroline Kennedy as "Ambassador to the Vatican" because her views on family planning do not echo precisely the Pope's.

...the Pope's stated belief that using condoms increases the spread of AIDS.

Religion may not matter to some Americans looking at the composition of the Supreme Court, but religious influence on public policy damn well matters to Holy Mother Church.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
65. The Church does voice HIS displeasure at Kerry and Kennedy
and others but they are not excommunicated. The threat is always there but it is seldom executed.

The leaders of the Church are not to be confused with the congregations. Tho I am not Catholic now, I was raised RC and went thru 16 years of schooling. The individual Catholics are less likely to follow in lock step whatever their leadership preaches than most other Christian faiths. Most Catholics I know personally are more likely to be pro-choice and support social justice issues than not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Yes the US bishops always manage to get on the wrong side of things.
They found a reason to oppose JFK in 1960 and Kerry in 2004, and lots of candidates in between. Biden too I think. It's too bad but the GOP knows how to play religious authorities like a calliope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. Which is too bad because I like calliopes.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #65
82. Who are the "leaders" leading, if the congregations are not following?
The "leadership preaches" and the congregations just go their merry way and invent their own unconstrained religion as they go? But the anti-leader individuals still refer to themselves as Catholic?

Do you understand why some of us are a bit confused???
Especially those of us who live lives consonant with our belief systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #82
87. Sure, it makes little sense.
But from what I remember from being Catholic - and others are welcome to chime in here - it became habit to think for ourselves on some things. Not that that was a conscious decision because that would have been a sin - just my interpretation on looking back. For instance, it just didn't seem practical to agree with the Pope about the Pill and contraception. What about unexpected pregnancies? The Pope was a nice, well-meaning person, but he was afterall very far away and a celibate male who didn't necessarily know about day to day stuff. We liked our Bishop when we saw him once a year if that at confirmations, etc. Our priests were a mish mash of thoughtful and unthinking and my brother made sure I knew which ones to not be alone with.

We were Catholic because our family had always been Catholic (except for those renegades who were Lutheran). It was a way of life and habit. Of course, none of us are Catholic anymore so not sure how much stock you should put in my opinion. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Very interesting -- thank you for posting this.
I took instruction from a priest when I married a Catholic, and was horrified at the things I was expected to believe.

Would be much simpler to be born into it, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. Converts of any religion are most intense...
Believe it all - hook line and sinker. My dad was a convert and my mom was always trying to get him to ease up a bit... esp that tithing thing made her nuts as we were stretched with 5 kids and her father living with us too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Is Kucinich really Catholic?
I thought he was all new-agey or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
66. really Catholic:
"His family was Roman Catholic, and Kucinich has said that their worship was a 'private practice that included mass' and that they attended more than a dozen different churches as they moved from place to place. . . .

"He attended St. John Cantius School, a Catholic high school in Cleveland. Kucinich has said that while growing up he studied the Scriptures and the lives of the saints, and was influenced by the Catholic Workers Movement."

http://pewforum.org/religion08/profile.php?CandidateID=14
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #66
85. Isn't he on his third marriage?
He may have been raised Catholic but, like a lot of us, has moved on. Though, I did learn some good liberal values in Catechism (feed the hungrey, house the homeless, etc) and I took those with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well, I hadn't noticed, but there does seem a disproportionate representation.
Just as there is a disproportionate number of men on the Court. Which is an imbalance we seek to correct. But the other imbalance is okey dokey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. Of the nine justices, four or five should be women, to be representational
of the population of the country. (We have less than half that, if Sotomayor is confirmed).

If 25% of the American people are Catholic, we should have 2.25 SCOTUS justices who are Catholic, not six (6).

But I can't mention this without being ragged on for being anti-Catholic. I'm supposed to just nod and smile when the Pope dictates to the President of the United States who shall be "acceptable" as Ambassador to Ring-Kissing ceremonies at the Vatican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Libertyfirst Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. I don't care
Edited on Tue May-26-09 03:20 PM by Libertyfirst
if the new justice is green and purple dotted, with red and white hair who is a druid. All I want is a left of center justice who believes the Constitution means what it says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
27. Hmm...
Edited on Tue May-26-09 03:24 PM by BolivarianHero
I don't have a problem with Catholicism in and of itself, but 5 Catholics, 0 Muslims, and 0 non-theists is a load of crap to me. Ironically, many of the very few world leaders I still have respect for, such as Chavez and Correa, are Catholics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
40. You Know What I Think Is Sad? People Who Try to Separate the Vatican from the Church.
On this very thread, there are people saying the Pope's an asshole, but catholics are alright. They treat religion like politics: I don't like the president, but I'm still a loyal American. Religion doesn't work that way...at least, the catholic religion doesn't. As a catholic, you're supposed to obey the teachings of the church...which includes whatever the Pope says. You don't get to pick and choose. If you believe otherwise, you're a hypocrite.

You also don't get to rationalize away your support for an organization that has historically and consistently perpetuated some of the most horrific acts of evil ever seen. You can deplore the abuse of little boys all you like, but every cent you contribute to the church goes to fund pedophiles...not to mention misogynist homophobes. Even if you don't contribute monetarily, just defending the church enables them to continue their vile practices.

As a former catholic who realized at a pretty early age what a sick organization it really is, I don't have a lot of respect for people who are able to make peace with the reality of the church vs what they think it should be. And I don't have a lot of trust for adults who consider themselves catholic but accept positions of power that will bring them into conflict with ideals that they claim to hold sacred. At best, they're hypocrites. At worst, religious zealots who'll weigh everything against their faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. I'm an atheist and not affiliated with any church, but be careful making that argument...
Religion has social and cultural dimensions as well as philosophical and theological ones. Start with secular Jews (many of which are agnostics or atheists) if you still don't understand what I refer to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. I'm amazed at how many "Catholics" don't seem to understand that
their faith requires them to believe that the Pope is infallible when he speaks in matters regarding the church or church doctrine.

That's a given.

When the Pope speaks ex cathedra (from the seat of authority in the church) Catholics are required to accept unquestioningly anything and everything he says.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. And disagreeing with it is something that is handled within the sacrament of
confession. We are also required to accept the existence of God, there have been histories of saints who have wrestled with that most basic belief of Christianity and Catholicism. Those sins are dealt with in confession, and all sins are not neatly wrapped up one five minute confession, some people go through extended times with things. But in Catholicism not accepting the infallibility of the Pope falls well below denying the Holy Spirit, to put one's sins above the power of God to forgive.

Also a Papal issue of dogma ex cathedra is vary rare, once in the 1900's and twice in the 1800's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. "Rare." Okay. Except I find the concept/practice of "confession" even more problematic
than the infallibility of the pope. But to each their own.

For the Pope's sake I am glad you can believe all these things, and at least you are not knocking on my door trying to convert me, and for that I am deeply grateful. Thank you. (I will not be knocking on your door, either.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. You think three times in the last 200 years isn't rare?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. If I told you I commit murder only rarely, would you think that's okay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Someone declaring religious dogma is equal to murder? Wow, you are on a "git em" tear tonight
Have fun.


It's really only two in the last 200 years, the assumption of Mary in 1950, and the immaculate conception which was proclaimed ex cathedra before Vatican I declared Papal infallibility itself as dogma.


Now of course the declaration of Papal Infallibility by Vatican I is theologically seen as revelation therefore previous declarations of dogma by Popes are included if they meet the requirements for Papal infallibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. Congratulations on missing the point utterly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. Seemed the point was if saying someone committing murder rarely was bad that had
something to do with Papal declarations of dogma ex cathedra which are also rare. If you weren't using it to make a point about that then what did it have to do with, MPG of the federal government's auto fleet? The amount of rainfall year to date in eastern Colorado? If I utterly missed the point and you were not relating the general goodness or badness of murder and declaring religious dogma, then please tell me the point you were making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. Taking Confession Implies That You Are Sorry For Your Sins, And Wish to Repent.
If you believe the Pope is a misogynistic, homophobic, pedophile-enabler, and you have no intention of changing your mind, then you are not taking the sacrament of confession in good faith, and your "sin" will not be forgiven. You'd be better off becoming a fundie, so that you can claim that now that you've accepted Jeebus as your personal savior, you're automatically forgiven for every bad thing you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #56
83. Well put.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
74. well you should be it.one of our "divine mysteries" LOL! i kid, i was an atheist at age 8....
Edited on Tue May-26-09 11:29 PM by bettyellen
but i managed to spend another 8 years in catholic schools, so... you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #46
77. Don't Seem To Understand, Or Choose To Ignore It?
Are you sure that a majority of american catholics don't know the pope is infalliable on matters of faith?

Or, is it that they willfully choose to ignore that part of the canon?

Given the nature of americans, i'd guess, being raised Catholic and surrounded by lots of them, that it's more likely they just don't really pay attention to the infallibility element.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #40
51. Hey, you know who's a Catholic?
Stephen Colbert.

Your signature quotes a "hypocrite."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Stephen Colbert Doesn't Make, Enforce, or Interpret Law.
He can be as much of a hypocrite as he wants, as long as he stays funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. You attack all Catholics in your initial tirade.
Stephen Colbert is obviously a hypocrite.

He'll be sooo sad about this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. I Only Attacked Catholics Who Support the Church But Denounce the Vatican.
They are certainly hypocrites. But they are MUCH better than the catholics who support the church AND the Vatican. THOSE catholics are just evil. Personally, I hope Colbert is the former. As I made clear, I don't care if he's a hypocrite, because he doesn't make policy that affects my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cagesoulman Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. How many who want the ban are actually Catholics?
I had to deal with the fucking nuns in elementary school and I sure as hell want a limit on Catholics in the Supreme Court. In fact, I want a court of all liberal Jews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
43. Actually, a few of them do seem to look to the Vatican to find out how to vote.
I hope Sonia Sotomayer is not one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Then how do we have five current Catholic justices and still have the death
penalty?

I know it hasn't been challenged directly but if that were the case someone would have found a way to get enough of a challenge to them to do so. I mean, Rome would have called a Catholic attorney with a case and made her get it to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. Holy Mother Church is much more interested in subjugating women than
in extending any kindness or mercy to convicted criminals. Priorities, priorities.

Killing those guys doesn't matter much because they aren't having little Catholic babies anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. Not to put too fine a point on the matter, but it's not the Vatican they're looking to
They're looking to the right wing think tanks that have been giving them speaker's fees and doctrinal marching order for the past quarter century. It's not a Catholic thing--Catholic is simply a convenient code marker to anti abortion activists saying "Look, this 45 year old nominee has no paper trail in his 6 months on the federal bench, but he'll vote the right way (wink, wink) if you'll all just get behind him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
73. So, having five or six sitting Justices who were Southern Baptists wouldn't faze you all
a bit?

It would bother the hell out of me. Just like having five Catholic Justices bothers me and adding one more bothers me more.

This is a nation of many religions and beliefs so I find it myopic to say the least, that so many fail to see why having five or six of nine Justices who are members of one religious group is not REPRESENTATIVE of the people they are judging and, ultimately, is not in the best interests of our nation.

Perhaps if the Catholic church were known for its egalitarian ideals, its embrace of and tolerance for other religions, and its historic defense of rationality and science over mythology and dogma, I'd be more receptive to some of its members making decisions that affect the democratic institutions of our nation. But, as we all know, that has not been the case.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Badgerman Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
78. Apply the 'Separation Clause'. ZERO religious on the bench, PERIOD! how about that?
Edited on Wed May-27-09 07:27 AM by Badgerman
speeling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
79. But....but....don't you know the truth about Catholics?
The sole purpose of the religion is to allow for priests to abuse children. That's everything that Catholics stand for. That, and mean nuns back in the 1950s. That's what Catholicism is all about. At least that's what some people told me and I believed them.....



:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC