Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin and RNC squirm through campaign spending loophole on wardrobe spending spree

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 12:56 PM
Original message
Palin and RNC squirm through campaign spending loophole on wardrobe spending spree


The Federal Election Commission today threw out a watchdog group's complaint against Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin, the Republican National Committee, and several political operatives associated with the RNC, alleging that they improperly spent $150,000 on clothing for Palin and her family.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics cited news reports that clothing and accessories purchases for Palin and her family included $49,425 spent at Saks Fifth Avenue and $75,062 at Neiman Marcus. The group said the shopping excursions violate campaign finance law because the law specifically prohibits a candidate for federal office from converting campaign funds to personal use, including clothing.

But the law has a loophole for money raised, not by individual candidates, but by political parties. The FEC ruled that the clothing purchases were permitted as “coordinated party expenditures.”

"In effect, the FEC is claiming its hands were tied and it could not penalize the RNC or Governor Palin," CREW said today.


The article goes on to note: "Still, Palin's wardrobe malfunction did help cost her in popularity after an initial burst of enthusiasm, especially from the Republican rank-and-file. The Alaska governor is still in the conversation, however, for 2012."

So, take that all you people who said in November that we'd never hear from Sarah Palin again. I said at the time and still say that we are stuck with her for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC