Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Dept. drops case against war resistor Watada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:14 PM
Original message
Justice Dept. drops case against war resistor Watada
http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/05/06/justice-dept-drops-case-against-war-resistor-watada/


By Stephen C. Webster

Published: May 6, 2009
Updated 2 hours ago


The Department of Justice has dropped its case against 1st Lt. Ehren Watada, a war resistor who refused Iraq deployment in June 2006 and denounced President George W. Bush’s decision to invade as illegal and immoral.

In Feb. 2007, military judge Lieutenant Colonel John Head halted Watada’s case following possible inconsistencies concerning a “stipulation of fact” agreed before the hearing. The decision led to a mistrial, ending Watada’s court marshal. The Army appealed, but a judge said Watada could not be tried again on the same charges, as it would violate his right to be free of double jeopardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. KnR. I'm so glad to hear this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. k and r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommended.
Lt. Watada was right all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent news and long overdue!
Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed! k+r, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R -
Rock on, Lt. Watada!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yep, no difference between Obama and Bush
Can I get an "Amen"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Amen
Great news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. we'll see what his Pentagon does
On many military issues and initiatives, there has been a predictable continuity of purpose and activity from former Bush appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sweet! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yatta!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is seriously important. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sort of...
Presuming he is still in uniform they could hand him order to Iraq tomorrow and it would start all over again. Different refusal, new case. With the lessons learned from the first one, he would be a short time until he was back in the brig and later Leavenworth. Alternatively he could be placed in a military transport at taken to Iraq against his will. All nice and legal.

Somehow I don't think the military is going to let go of his so easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. Success!!! Eat it, George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC