Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Rude Pundit - The Death of the Republican Party, Part 1: Janet Jackson's Nipple of Doom

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:26 AM
Original message
The Rude Pundit - The Death of the Republican Party, Part 1: Janet Jackson's Nipple of Doom
Here's where we stand as a nation: Right now, it is more likely that someone or some entity will be punished for the split-second exposure of Janet Jackson's naked titty during the 2004 Super Bowl than for authorizing the torture of detainees at our prison in Guantanamo Bay. It is more likely that someone will get fined for Bono exuberantly broguing the word "fucking" as an adverb during a live awards show than for wrecking the American economy. These are the type of ruins left behind after an indulgent period in 2003-2004, when scared shitless Democrats, cowed by the Karl Rove-created juggernaut of post-9/11 Bushistic politics, forgot that there was a fucking war going on and actually enabled the Republican Congress to hold hearings and raise FCC fines because of a breast that you could only see if you went tenth of a second by tenth of a second through the video, the typical masturbatory obsessiveness of the religious right.

Even now, with the Supreme Court's two rulings in the last week upholding the fleeting, spontaneous "fuck" regulation on a 5-4 vote and sending the Jackson boob back to a federal appeals court to reconsider its overturning of a fine, Democratic Senator John D. Rockefeller declared, "We must be doing more, not less, to give the FCC and parents all across America the resources they need to protect their children from indecent programming." Once a prison bitch, always a prison bitch.

Of course, it probably doesn't need to be pointed out that by the time the Congress was arguing about fucks and tits, America was waterboarding the fucking tits off Abu Zubaydah and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and more or less making psychological and physical wrecks out of other detainees in various prisons, with the Abu Ghraib photos just coming out. But, especially to Republicans, there was far, far more indecency in that nipple.

Democrats were on a death march, desperately flailing about, completely disempowered, trying to figure out the best way to be junior Republicans, too blinded by fear to oppose the President, even with the filibuster, simply trying not to hemorrhage in the next election. Of course, we know what happened, when the mind-blowing incompetence of the Bush administration brought the chickens home to roost. But that was still three years away.

However, the revival of the Janet Jackson nipple case is a reminder to people of just why they eventually turned so viciously on Republicans and why the GOP is an Al Franken away from irrelevance, and it's a warning, in a way, to Democrats. After the start of the Iraq war, Republicans became bloated with power (forgetting the minor setback in that was the savage end of the Gingrich "revolution" when they overplayed their hand during the Clinton impeachment). In those heady pre-Katrina days, Republicans indulged themselves like mini-Caligulas at the horse-fucking fair, and, quite simply, they did nothing to actually improve anyone's life except Halliburton's. And as everything started to turn south, the war, the economy, the world's opinion of us, Republicans still refused to do anything - fucking anything - that would actually make the country better.

It was ideology over pragmatism. It was throwing bones to the base at the expense of the larger public. Republicans nuzzled up to Janet Jackson's nipple and suckled it dry. And that's what they're left with: chapped lips at an empty teat, weeping to get one more meal from it.

Coming up: why the Supreme Court nominee battle will stab the GOP in the gut.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Pssst...
Meegbear, dude. We're not supposed to leave West Lahunga Beach, I mean the GLBT forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saboburns Donating Member (690 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Janet Jackson didn't bare her boob. Not at all.
This is not important in the big scheme of things, but, it continues to bother me none the less.

Janet Jackson did not bare her boob. She didn't take her bra off.

Justin Timberlake did.

But you never hear that, we keep hearing that Janet Jackson showed her tits.

I always wondered why that is?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr_liberal Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Because it was something they BOTH had planned.
Janet Jackson wanted publciity for her new cd that was coming out. Timberlake went along with it. It was a Jackson publicity stunt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I've said that all along!
Why else would she have a chrome throwing star nipple ring on under a tight leather outfit?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. If he went along with it than they Both "did it."
I never did understand why she took all the heat when the man pulled it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
needledriver Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Because Janet Jackson was fully complicit
It was by no means a "wardrobe malfunction". The break away bra functioned exactly as designed - or do you truly believe that Janet Jackson habitually wears spiky metal nipple covers under her clothing?

http://www.janetjacksonflash.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Rude: always spot on
KnR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strong Atheist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oooh, ooh, I want to hear that Supreme court battle opinion!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr_liberal Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm really surprised by the ruling.
I thought for sure the FCC would lose by at least 5 to 4. I'm assuming Kennedy joined the Conservatives. Id have to read more about it to see why, because he has in the past been pretty good on free speech.

Hopefully it will come back to the court and they'll completely take away the FCCs power to censor tv, or at least limit it more severely.

Seems to me though with a new FCC and an Obama appointment they should say themselves that fining fleeting expletives or spontaneous instances like the "wardrobe malfunction" is a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. For those who missed the original "incident" :
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Rude Pundit nails it
as usual
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC