Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Church opposes more time for victims to sue - Business is business

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 10:49 AM
Original message
Church opposes more time for victims to sue - Business is business
http://www.suntimes.com/lifestyles/religion/323163,CST-NWS-leg02.article

Bill would help those claiming child sex abuse

April 2, 2007
BY WHITNEY WOODWARD Sun-Times Springfield Bureau

SPRINGFIELD -- A bid to let all childhood sexual abuse victims sue those who harmed them -- even decades after the fact -- has prompted the Catholic Church to take on victim advocates in an effort to kill the measure.

Sen. Terry Link (D-Vernon Hills) introduced a bill that would give victims of childhood sexual abuse a two-year period after the bill becomes law in which to sue those responsible, but gutted it after protests from church officials.

The bill would have opened a window for lawsuits even if the statute of limitations -- or time period in which legal action can be taken -- had expired.

Four years ago, lawmakers extended the window during which childhood sexual abuse victims can file a suit to five years after "discovering" or recognizing the abuse, or by the age of 28, whichever is later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Church really is disgusting
For the life of me, I can't understand why the church goers don't just stop donating until certain issues are resolved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. They have stopped donating - in massive numbers.
The catholic church generally in the US is in BIG financial trouble. Parishes and catholic schools are closing or merging all over the country. Charitable programs, especially St. Vincent de Paul are having to gut their programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Vatican has huge investments in banking, insurance, chemicals, steel, construction, real estate
I wonder why they would begin by gutting their charitable programs at the first sign of trouble?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. the American archdioceses are all independent.
financially each diocese is responsible for itself and it's parishes. The vatican does not financially bail out American parishes or dioceses.
About the only thing they will do is approve a transfer of molester priests outside the US, usually to the Vatican, to protect them from the long arm of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. But American archdioceses send money to the Vatican regularly
Edited on Mon Apr-02-07 11:49 AM by NNN0LHI
I assumed that would have been a two way street? Thats what I get for assuming stuff.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The vatican does LOAN money to Dioceses
They do make non interest loans to the Diocese and then the Diocese can loan that money to parishes who need to expand their facilities or to catholic schools for improvements or whatever. But the money does have to paid back to the Vatican.

I am not catholic but this is how I am told it works by someone who works for the local Archdiocese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-02-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. How fucking DISGUSTING. Why not a time limit on MURDER, too, while we're at it?
A two year limit on the murder of child molesters, how's that sound? Kill the molester, escape justice for two years, and you're home free?

I realize the State Senator's heart is in the right place--he's providing people who are finally coming to terms with abuse the vehicle to pursue justice. That said, though, quite frankly, I oppose ANY statute of limitations on child abuse. Some people are afraid, some people have family they don't want to know, there are a host of reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC