|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 01:11 PM Original message |
Medical experts cast doubt on the actual danger of swine flu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. "Primed a bit for overresponse"! That's a good one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. It's all the 24 hour 'news' channels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. Most of us will be on the right side of the percentages - small consolation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. The omgwe'reallgonnadie flu mongers will never admit to being wrong, naturally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. You know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I don't think I've seen anyone here really totally over-reacting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:18 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. 1918! 1918! 1918! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. You want to know what the funny (odd) part about that is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatSeg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 08:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. One of the reasons the 1918 pandemic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. are you kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:43 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I'm sorry I missed your thread. Sounds interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 07:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. "There were just too many (flu threads)." - But yet - you had no idea people were overreacting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
4. Monday morning quarterbacking is what this is called. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. I still don't understand why they felt the need to compare this to the 1918 flu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. nor why folks here did, either. it was irresponsible, & contrary to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phantom power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. That's no mystery. Because the initial mortality estimates were 6%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rustydog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. The CDC and WHO have not over reacted to the swine flu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. i don't think most public health people fed the hype either. but there were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
13. The agencies attacked the "pandemic" as an exercise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
life_long_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
19. At least someone acknowledges the anthrax attacks in 2001. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC