|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:31 PM Original message |
How about a NON-LAWYER, NON-JUDGE for the Supreme Court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. yeah, let's not make a Federal case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnfunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
63. Take the poll at APJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whopis01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 04:29 AM Response to Reply #1 |
230. LOL n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datasuspect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. if rodney dangerfield were alive, i would nominate him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. Howard Dean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
4. Um, no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
5. How about a "non judge." I think being a lawyer is helpful. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Lawyers are not only educated in law they are molded with rigid thinking . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:03 PM Response to Reply #27 |
40. Utter nonsense. The opposite is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
45. Doctors aren't "molded with rigid thinking", they are trained in analytical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:47 PM Response to Reply #45 |
74. Deleted message |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:49 PM Response to Reply #74 |
98. Oh, ok. I'll carry on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:36 AM Response to Reply #74 |
152. wow Odin2005 you managed to fling venom all over the place with that one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
47. I'm afraid I haven't quite "got it"--I don't believe that because Bush hired a bunch of asshole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 07:49 AM Response to Reply #27 |
231. The doctors at my clinic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
6. Gary Busey or Denis Leary for SCOTUS!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
44. Dennis Leary would be awesome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:17 AM Response to Reply #44 |
147. Denis Leary is awesome, the bastid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 08:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
237. Not Denis Leary! It would be really weird for me to have a raging passion for a SCOTUS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. Good 'ol American anti-intellectualism. "America: Stupid and LOVIN it!!!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
49. Kissinger was an intellectual. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:12 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Support for teh stupid lobby noted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
83. no kidding. Next up - wrestler *The Undertaker* for POTUS, because he's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #83 |
223. Hah! I wasn't the only one reminded of Idiocracy by the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:47 PM Response to Reply #223 |
227. If that is your art... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 08:51 PM Response to Reply #227 |
236. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realisticphish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
9. Mel Gibson!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sammythecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
25. Yes!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
10. Lewis Black? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Brilliant and the only non lawyer I would endorse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:46 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. the only other one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Lewis Black --------- and George Carlin .... let the CLONING begin -- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
57. Or Larry David---Curb Your BS. Imagine him doing that looking into your eyes thing on Antonin Scalia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
11. Sorry, stupid idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
64. Thomas was a lawyer and a judge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Thomas actually spews the least BS of any Justice from the actual bench (or chair or whatever it is) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:19 PM Response to Reply #67 |
106. Evidently, he also parrots Scalia . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 07:54 PM Response to Reply #64 |
103. But NOT versed in constitutional law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:16 PM Response to Reply #64 |
105. Thomas was also in a Catholic seminary at one point . . . later a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
12. And how about some non-civil engineers to fix up the I-35 bridge? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
94. We have our WINNUR! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
13. good idea - lets put those legalities aside as we rule on the law of the land . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
14. uhh, no. I'm stunned that anyone would even suggest this, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:43 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Why . . . there's no requirement that the nominee be a lawyer . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
72. because they at least need to be familiar with case law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:27 PM Response to Reply #72 |
107. And how difficult do you think that is? How many clerks do they have, as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #107 |
218. You've Crossed The Line From Naivete To Dangerous Thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:12 AM Response to Reply #218 |
219. I Believe There's A Law Against Such Dangerous Thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
62. I wouldn't hire Justice Souter to do surgery on me either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #62 |
73. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. Because the supreme court sometimes handles cases that require |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Nonsense . . . any intelligent person can understand the cases --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:20 PM Response to Reply #20 |
58. Being able to understand a case is not the same as being able to rule on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:30 PM Response to Reply #58 |
108. If our law is so complicated that an ordinary intelligent person can't understand it . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #20 |
77. it's not JUST understanding the cases. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:40 PM Response to Reply #77 |
112. I've never seen American Idol . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #20 |
81. Legalese is complex and convoluted for a reason, to remove ambiguity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COLGATE4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
193. This is one of the silliest ideas I've ever heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 08:07 AM Response to Reply #193 |
232. It's the fallacy of the expert. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. It's like a POT OF FROGS. If you put a bunch of frogs into a pot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
92. Fine -e elect that person as your representative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:32 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Elect a frog? Let's not jump to conclusions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 08:12 AM Response to Reply #92 |
233. Although to be fair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prayin4rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
110. Creating TV programs and advertising with the lowest common denominator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:42 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Are you saying ordinary citizens are inferior to lawyers . . . ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prayin4rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:48 PM Response to Reply #113 |
117. At legal reasoning... definitely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:42 PM Response to Reply #117 |
131. Lincoln was never in law school -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prayin4rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:05 PM Response to Reply #131 |
133. Training/schooling to be a lawyer was quite different 150 years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:14 AM Response to Reply #133 |
168. Again, this is exactly what democracy is all about --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prayin4rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #168 |
180. Democracy is not about average people in top in positions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:57 PM Response to Reply #180 |
210. Actually, it is --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistler162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 07:01 PM Response to Reply #133 |
205. Actually Justice Robert H. Jackson never went to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prayin4rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:43 PM Response to Reply #205 |
207. Yes, even only 100 years ago training to be a lawyer was very different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:59 PM Response to Reply #207 |
211. The basis of your thinking should be that the people have to understand what is going on . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prayin4rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:40 PM Response to Reply #211 |
212. The average person can go to law school if they want to be on the SC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 12:03 AM Response to Reply #212 |
213. Again -- it is NOT a requirement that a SC nominee be a lawyer . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prayin4rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 12:23 AM Response to Reply #213 |
214. I never said it was a requirement and I am not panicking. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. Right . . . good idea . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
19. No, they need a legal background. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
28. They don't "need a legal background" . . . it's not an official requirement for the nominee --!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. There's never been a non-lawyer on the US Supreme court (for good reason) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:44 PM Response to Reply #30 |
114. There was never a SC that put a president in the Oval Office . . . for good reason . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. No, it's not an official requirement. But remember, if a Dem POTUS does it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
115. Do you think Americans would accept a Limbaugh nomination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #28 |
96. No, it's not required, but it would be stupid to put someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:48 PM Response to Reply #96 |
116. Why . . . . ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:10 PM Response to Reply #116 |
124. I would only let a doctor operate on me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:33 PM Response to Reply #124 |
129. A surgeon isn't part of government . . . the basis of democracy is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 07:04 AM Response to Reply #129 |
162. Are you saying everyone understands the Commerce Clause, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:27 AM Response to Reply #162 |
170. We don't understand corporate interests . . . is that what you mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northzax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 01:16 AM Response to Reply #129 |
215. You ever hear the old adage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:13 PM Response to Reply #19 |
52. I agree that a legal background is needed, but judge experience isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:49 PM Response to Reply #52 |
118. Clarence Thomas makes a "terrible" SC justice . . . he was rated very low by ABA . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
22. why compare a non-lawyer, non-judge to a "relative idiot"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
119. Certainly Noam Chomsky or Howard Zinn would make fine SC Justices . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lpbk2713 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
23. Phil Donahue? Bill Moyers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
31. Robert Redford ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:06 PM Response to Reply #31 |
86. wow, you certainly travel in narrow circles--how about gloria steinem? gloria allred? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:53 PM Response to Reply #86 |
120. I'm a strong feminist but not a Steinem fan -- tho she would have been better than Thomas--!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
26. How about a non-college, non-medical person to do my next surgery? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:11 PM Response to Reply #26 |
50. Sure, I can handle that little problem for ya--hand me that ginsu knife! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:37 PM Response to Reply #50 |
65. At it turns out, I'm getting ready to do that very thing right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #65 |
95. Sure--bring the thread along with your anesthesia!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
29. better yet, don't replace souter... let's just use a cnn internet poll as the ninth "judge"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. See, now, I can tell you're not a lawyer---coming up with such a simple brilliant proletariat idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
namahage (678 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:54 PM Response to Reply #34 |
132. I see you live in CA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:20 PM Response to Reply #132 |
137. I think you may have tooken 1's post a little more seriously than I did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:38 PM Response to Reply #137 |
225. "Tooken?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:42 PM Response to Reply #225 |
226. So I left off the "ed". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:48 PM Response to Reply #226 |
228. Ok. You got me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:52 PM Response to Reply #228 |
229. Gottened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
32. If we could CLONE someone . . . it would be Barbara Jordan . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
55. Yes, Barbara Jordan was a lawyer ... an excellent one. A professor of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
35. Non-Judge-maybe, non-lawyer-probably unwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. No horses! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
121. So . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
38. I gots uncommunicated eyeballs ..... pick me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
39. Thanks, Joe the Plumber, for that sage advice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
41. I expect my Supreme Court justices to have more than a passing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:00 PM Response to Reply #41 |
122. Well . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugabear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
42. Sure, I'll take the job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:07 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Those powdered wigs were good enough for George Washington--a NON-LAWYER. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:53 PM Response to Reply #46 |
80. Washington was far better educated than Americans today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. I thought you said you didn't want people like George Washington on the Supreme Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:59 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. nice dodge on the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Probably neither of us is as dumb as we seem to think the other is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #46 |
97. George never sat on the Supremes, though! Wig or no wig! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TimesSquareCowboy (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
43. You probably need a lawyer, but not a judge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blindpig (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
48. Willie Nelson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raskolnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
53. Please tell me this is satire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
54. As soon as Heart Surgeons start operating without going to medical school, let me know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
56. Is this the beginning of a "Jon Stewart for Supreme Court" campaign??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:03 PM Response to Reply #56 |
123. I'd take Jon Stewart --- humor and humanist -- ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
59. Love it!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. All it takes is one frog in the pot of frogs who asks "Is this water getting really fucking hot?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
60. Sorry - we tried it your way - teh stupid way - for 8 years. No more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #60 |
89. I don't agree with him either, but that is not called for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Thank you. Plus, there is different varieties of stpuid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
66. How about a NATIVE AMERICAN? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #66 |
88. ward churchill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
68. Should college professors be just random guys pulled off the street? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:45 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. I've had profs I think somebody pulled off on the street randomly as it is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
69. And the Secretary of Education can be illiterate! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #69 |
78. That's going two far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
70. If they go non-judge, Michael Moore, John Conyers or Dennis Kucinich would be my picks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
76. No. I want someone who understands the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:53 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. What I want, what I need, and what I get is two different things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
87. I'd rather have someone who has studied the appropriate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
91. Patton Oswald. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
99. If you need surgery, as many here apparently do, you don't need a lawyer OR a so-called doctor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:42 PM Response to Reply #99 |
195. Let me perform exploratory brain surgery on you then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:50 PM Response to Reply #195 |
197. Okay. I'm curious what's in there. I doubt a little amateur exploratory brain surgery now & then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
100. OMG WTF BBQ JOE TEH PLUMBER FOR SUPREME COURT!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
101. Don't feed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 06:07 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Physician, heal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
104. Completely AWFUL idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:15 PM Response to Reply #104 |
125. Let me assure you that they all understand the Constitution . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
109. Um..... how about my plumber performs your brain surgery? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:17 PM Response to Reply #109 |
126. Evidently you're saying that you can't begin to understand any of the cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #126 |
128. And any technical matters, just go to lawguru.com. It isn't brain surgery, although |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:36 PM Response to Reply #128 |
130. You might recall that law was a matter of -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:10 PM Response to Reply #130 |
136. The law is infintely more complicated now than it was then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:20 AM Response to Reply #136 |
169. Too complicated . . . ? You're saying you didn't understand Bush vs Gore--? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #169 |
194. You're suggesting an either/or where none exists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:50 PM Response to Reply #194 |
209. What "either/or" . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:07 PM Response to Reply #126 |
134. That's exactly what I'm saying. Not well enough to be nominated to the Supreme Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:12 AM Response to Reply #126 |
145. The stupid. It hurts me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prayin4rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
111. Isn't this the same concept that the Republicans just used for the VP position? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:18 PM Response to Reply #111 |
127. We got Bush/Cheney because the corrupt Supreme Court put him in the Oval Office -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prayin4rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:08 PM Response to Reply #127 |
135. They did not put him in office, they remanded, and there was a ferocious dissent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:30 AM Response to Reply #135 |
171. The Supreme Court did not put Bush into the Oval Office . . . ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
138. How did such potato-droppings get 2 recs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
139. How about a NON-MED-SCHOOL, NON-DOCTOR surgeon next time you're injured? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:58 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. There are plenty of do-it-yourself surgery sites on the internets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:59 PM Response to Reply #140 |
141. "Brain surgery is not rocket science." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 12:20 AM Response to Reply #141 |
142. It almost sounds like something from ... Alice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:16 AM Response to Reply #140 |
143. I have actually done some autosurgery... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:34 AM Response to Reply #140 |
173. Presumably, they forgot to make being a lawyer a requirement to be on SC??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:32 AM Response to Reply #139 |
172. You have to have a license to practice medicine . . . you don't have to be a lawyer to be on SC . .! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:18 AM Response to Original message |
144. Really really bad idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:36 AM Response to Reply #144 |
174. Think about democracy . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:16 AM Response to Original message |
146. Too bad George Carlin died. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:34 AM Response to Reply #146 |
151. Amen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:38 AM Response to Reply #151 |
153. I'm #3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:43 AM Response to Reply #153 |
155. I suspected as much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:45 AM Response to Reply #155 |
157. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 04:11 AM Response to Reply #157 |
160. I had to look that up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 04:25 AM Response to Reply #160 |
161. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #161 |
187. grumpy + sad = whinge ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:18 PM Response to Reply #187 |
192. # |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 05:25 PM Response to Reply #192 |
199. & |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 05:34 PM Response to Reply #199 |
203. + |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varkam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:20 AM Response to Original message |
148. I'm going to guess this is sarcasm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:29 AM Response to Original message |
149. Great idea! Maybe a judge from American Idol? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:39 AM Response to Reply #149 |
154. Susan Boyle!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:32 AM Response to Original message |
150. Jello Biafra |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:44 AM Response to Original message |
156. I think it's time for Justice Clinton on the Supreme Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:46 AM Response to Reply #156 |
158. Supreme Funkourt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unapatriciated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 08:23 AM Response to Reply #156 |
167. Ya no see it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:38 AM Response to Reply #156 |
175. A DLC-corporate candidate . . . ? Don't think we need more of that -- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacoD (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:14 AM Response to Reply #175 |
177. Whoosh!! (eom) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 12:51 PM Response to Reply #175 |
182. George Parliament Funkadelic Clinton is a DLC-corporate candidate?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #175 |
190. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:47 AM Response to Original message |
159. Very well: Louis CK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
163. Mr. Ed would be an improvment over long dong Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:18 AM Response to Reply #163 |
178. Yeah, and Justice Ed will never speak, unless he has something to say! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
164. I think we need a reality TV show to decide it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 01:44 PM Response to Reply #164 |
186. Excellent ideas! There's no reason the Supreme Court has to be so haughty & elitistical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olegramps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
165. How about me performing your next surgery in my garage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olegramps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 08:16 AM Response to Reply #165 |
166. I believe that Manson is available with lots of experience with the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
176. The person IMO has to have a law degree and be a member of some... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
179. How about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
181. Let's have a Native American. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
183. I think an attentive lifelong TV watcher picks up enough knowledge from law shows |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:47 PM Response to Reply #183 |
196. Now I've confirmed what I've thought - that you're just having a go at us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #196 |
198. Does that mean you're not going to perform the exploratory brain surgery on me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
184. Actually I think that's a horrible idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
185. Yeah, a NON-ACTOR Governing California is working out so well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
188. No thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 08:22 PM Response to Reply #188 |
206. Thank you for being so courteous in disagreeing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
189. Clone Barack Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:12 PM Response to Reply #189 |
191. Brilliant idea - they could use it for the presidency too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:44 PM Response to Reply #189 |
208. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buns_of_Fire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
200. Okay. I pick Clint Eastwood. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 05:30 PM Response to Reply #200 |
201. Heh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
202. Better yet, how about a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 06:10 PM Response to Reply #202 |
204. I asked him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
216. No. Barack Obama's got this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:52 AM Response to Reply #216 |
217. I know somebody who knows somebody, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
220. Spiderman! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 06:27 PM Response to Reply #220 |
221. Don't be silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
222. Bailiff... thwack his pee-pee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 04:37 PM Response to Reply #222 |
235. Who doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-03-09 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
224. Diana Ross. She already has Supremes experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-04-09 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
234. I think 'judging' is complicated job and I want someone with experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC