Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arianna: Why Are Bankers Still Being Treated As Beltway Royalty?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:44 PM
Original message
Arianna: Why Are Bankers Still Being Treated As Beltway Royalty?
...Just this week, the bankers and their lobbyists -- who you might have reasonably thought would be the political equivalent of lepers in the halls of power these days -- have kneecapped substantive bankruptcy reform in the Senate, helped pull the plug on a government-brokered deal with Chrysler, and tried feverishly to throw up a roadblock in the way of credit card reform in the House.

You heard me right. America's bankers -- those wonderful folks who brought us the economic meltdown -- are still being treated as Beltway royalty by those in Congress.

According to Sen. Dick Durbin, the banks "are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place."

When it comes to reforming our financial system, we are truly through the looking glass. I mean, since when did it become "to the vanquished go the spoils"? How do the same banks that have repeatedly come to Washington over the last eight months with their hats in their hands, asking for billions to rescue them from their catastrophic mistakes, somehow still "own the place"?

But the banks continue to be rewarded for their many failures.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/why-are-bankers-still-bei_b_194242.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well... Look Who's In Charge Of Obama's Economic Policies?
Edited on Fri May-01-09 02:49 PM by MannyGoldstein
Summers and Geithner, two very, very close friends of the bankers. What does that tell you about where bankers sit in the pecking order?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. We need more pies in billionares faces.
Did Bill Gates have that kid who piefaced him killed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thought Obama kicked ALL the lobbyists out.
Guess that only applies to the peon lobbyists. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bankers are scum. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sometimes I wonder if this isn't why banks spend so much on commercials on radio and tv.
They don't want to give the public time to think about what's really been going on behind the glossy ads and PR pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why does Obama sit inside the pocket of these people?
Edited on Fri May-01-09 04:05 PM by truedelphi
His latest explanation is that when he started to campaign for his party's nomination (ie Money Party Ib's nomination) the main things he had to focus on were the two wars this nation was fighting.

And then, out of the blue - BLAM! - the collapse of the housing bubble and stock market? Just plain out of the blue. I mean, I guess he never thought he'd ever have to focus on the ersatz economy. (now there's Presidential material for yah!) He didn't really consider the ECONOMY! So we should all be very forgiving because he cannot be asked to make good choices when he wasn't expecting to have to focus on something as trivial as the nation's economy.

What Obama doesn't mention is all the wonderful campaign monies he received from those connected to Wall Street. No wonder, that by the end of November 2008, the man who normally says he has to sit back and get an idea of what is really going on, nope, in November of 2008, when Asked by Sixty Minutes about economic issues, he is not trying to understand diddley - No,instead he already knows the direction he is to put his White House. Even though he claims this past week that he never really focused on the money issues.

So he answers, assuring them that he had met with Hank Paulson, and that "Hank was working hard."

Sort of a "Good job there, Brownie," moment that left me to realize how my vote had been taken away from me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dembotoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. because we worship money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inwiththenew Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Money talks
and bullshit walks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. If money talked, then the banks would be silent, and we would be talking.
Because we taxpayers are funding the banks -- as depositors and as taxpayers to the government. And, by the way banks are paying 1/2 percent interest to depositors in some cases now.

And then they wonder why Americans don't save. Wouldn't you expect the interest rate you earn on your money to be higher than the interest rate you pay when you borrow? Seems to me the saver is supposed to be earning the interest. What am I not understanding here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The 2 biggest problems I have with Obama are
his economic policies and his reluctance to prosecute the criminals from the previous administration. Being in bed with either the banks or the Bushes is no my idea of change we can believe in. I'm also not very happy with his "embrace" of snarlin' Arlen, either, especially when he could back a real dem. in Joe Sestak.

Having said that, I'm very happy with the other things he's done, but I am really disappointed by the above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. One of my real problems with President Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC