Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vintage Sexism: I'm Glad I'm a Boy! I'm Glad I'm a Girl!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:50 AM
Original message
Vintage Sexism: I'm Glad I'm a Boy! I'm Glad I'm a Girl!
Binary gender systems are constructed. They rely on the repetition of dominant narratives via psychology, music, popular culture, film and of course children's books. This gem comes from a children's book called, "I'm Glad I'm a Boy! I'm Glad I'm a Girl! It is from the 1950's and I almost appreciate how blatantly obvious it is, since there is no question what it is trying to do. Gender-based messaging is much more subtle and nuanced these days.You can see the book here:

http://michiedo.blogspot.com/2008/12/im-glad-im-boy-im-glad-im-girl.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Which one is the person in the pic at the bottom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Are you talking about the pic of me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Dude, what's the point of this comment?
Is it fun to be mean? x(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
66. I didn't see the comment but there was obviously no excuse for it.
Why some people need to be assholes is beyond me.

There is definitely nothing wrong with his picture. (I happen to think it's a great picture)

There is definitely something wrong with the person who felt he needed to proudly inform us about what an obnoxious prick he is by saying something derogatory about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. It's a nice picture, ccharles.
:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. I love the pic. b/c it always comes with a thought-provking op
and this one is bookmark-worthy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
67. Yes, Indeed he does.
Edited on Sat May-02-09 01:35 AM by TheWatcher
And hopefully he will post more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. I looked at the pictures at the link
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. My fav is girls can cook, boys can eat.
They want girls to be like 3 pounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Or boys can build, girls can clean
I'm glad I missed that stuff. It's horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. that looks like a grill, though. i thought that was the boy's job.
though the girl gets all the food ready and the boy puts is on the grill, then gives it back to the girl to make the plates up. this social engineering still exists, it is just more subtle, i guess, than that. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Who let you out of the kitchen to post this?
Edited on Fri May-01-09 06:33 AM by Renew Deal
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. ROFL
oh shit- :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. not even. They want them to live to like, 3 years old
how long can one live without eating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. My fav is "Boys are pilots, girls are stewardesses"
As though girls were physically incapable of flying a plane, and boys were physically incapable of pushing a drink cart. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Believing Is Art Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. My only purpose in life is to feed men?
Crap, I suck at cooking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. you better learn, girlie.... or how will you ever get a man to want you!!
and without a man, where will you be! we women couldn't get by without men to take care of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I will never forget a flyer I received at work back in the '80s, inviting me to attend a picnic.
The flyer indicated date, place and time of the picnic and said something to the effect of: "Girls: Bring a dish to pass. Guys: Bring your appetites!"

I wanted to throw up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. why does that not surprise me?!? LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. And baby making.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. Combine feeding and babies for a third function: feeding babies.
However, maybe I shouldn't have mentioned that. It could provoke a flame war that could get this thread locked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Believing Is Art Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
48. Oh God no
My uterus is not in a residential zoning district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. but you yourself don't need to eat, so the drudgery won't last long!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheManInTheMac Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. If you suck at cooking, you better cook at sucking.
That's my philosophy. (I'm joking, hope I didn't offend;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Believing Is Art Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Not offended, but
I'm not really sure what that means. Maybe get cookin' with the suckin'? I think the euphemism train is getting derailed somewhere . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustbunnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #47
53. I think it was meant in the slang sense, as in -

sizzling hot. Sometimes it can also mean going really fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #36
57. You're terrible!
:o :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #36
72. Haa! Good one!! Fits the media imagery w.r.t. women!
We are either hot sex-babes, or mommies with no interests other than homemaking in baybee-world..... um, or dried up old ladies supporting big-pharma....

oh, and always: Shoppers! Use your Power to Shop, laydeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Women, know your place !
Edited on Fri May-01-09 04:25 AM by dipsydoodle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. Those are HILARIOUS!!
:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. Another odd thing about those pictures ...
... boys don't do laundry (with the exception of the first picture--he only has one shirt?)

Speaking of the first picture, boys wear wigs?

And don't get me started on all the phallic imagery ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerousRhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. Looks like maybe something "subversive" was sneaked into this...
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_uS62aM_GVuk/SThqeSLc8EI/AAAAAAAABAA/-JYQedfES0Q/s1600-h/I%27m+Glad+9.bmp

Heroines? Shouldn't she be tied up on some train tracks, crying and waiting to be rescued by the hero?



:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. How nice. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. Sexism? In the fifties?
Great Scott!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. Actually the book copyright date is 1970, not 1950
Twenty-nine years ago, not forty-nine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Most leaders in all areas of life grew up during that time or earlier
Younger adults had parents who grew up during that time. Of course sexist perceptions are still with us today because of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
23. Never Ceases To Amaze Me How Sexist Things Were Not All That Long Ago.
Holy cow that the book actually exists in that form. Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Yet we still get the "it's biology not socialization" argument time and time again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Wow. That is worse than the "Even a woman can do it!" ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. Not so vintage
No few of those ideas are still alive in public perception. Binary genders systems are constructed, not only are they very sad, but so limiting and damaging to the human condition. Even biologically we have degrees of gender, if not outright "conditions" such as AIS (androgen insensitivity syndromes).

Even genital anomalies such as a very large clitoris or a very small penis have led to genital mutilation, if not gender reassignment-- rather than simple loving acceptance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. wow...
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. Blimey - but I'm not too surprised
It's a bit extreme, as even in the 50s and earlier children's books tended to take the attitude that it was fine for a girl to be a 'tomboy' so long as she grew up to be a fine feminine woman. But some of this attitude persisted - I remember being informed at my girls' school in the mid-70s: "The job of a woman is to nourish, uphold and sustain. To nourish, uphold and sustain!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
35. They had metermaids in the fifties?
I didn't know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdp349 Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
38. Ah the good old days, when white males had all of the power rather than just most of the power
:sarcasm: ... just in case (I've been a lurker for like 5 years, I know how this can turn out)

Also, it's line from American Dad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustbunnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. It's not a "white" thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. sure it is
In the "good old days" WASP hetero males DID have all of the power, and today they only have most of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustbunnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Real sexism is not a "white" thing. You can find it all over the world and it comes in every color.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. true
I thought we were talking about our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustbunnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. Our society includes many colors and different classes of power and affluence.

Poor Asians and middle-class black men can be, and are, sexist as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. sure
But it is not therefore "all equal" and does not "go both ways" as you have suggested elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustbunnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. What?

How does "boys eat" and "girls cook" relate to a woman who became Chancellor of Germany and was caricatured in a politically motivated underwear ad? :D

The point of that ad wasn't meant to demean women. It was to a gag-campaign meant to stimulate knicker purchases. Had the she been a he, the ad would have run regardless. That is equal and goes both ways.

Telling girls they can't become Chancellor of Germany because they are biologically destined to stay home and cook is a different matter altogether.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #54
63. You would have been much clearer if this was included in post #40.
But I would argue that wealthy-to-middle-class asian men, wealthy black men, and poor black men can also be sexist. So can poor and middle class whites. So can hispanics of all wealth distribution.

Please be aware of your own projections. This is not some taboo topic that liberals are biased about. (Well maybe some of us, but definitely not me). :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustbunnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #63
76. What taboos and projections?
Have no idea what you're talking about.

My comment addressed the fact that sexism isn't a particularly caucasian manifestation.

I would argue the same as you, only I didn't think it necessary to list every race/class combo possible. Figured people would get it with two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #54
77. In "the good old days," "poor Asians and middle-class black men" didn't have the power white men did
and then, like now, there was plenty of sexism to go around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustbunnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #77
78. They had power within their communities and extended families.

For the women living within these communities, same diff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. Like I said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
45. Welcome to DU! I see that lurking has made you cautious...
Funny ... but get that post count up.

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. I am female and I was a child in the 1950s. When asked what I wanted to be...
...when I grew up, my reply was that, "I want to be a doctor or a lawyer." In reply to my answer, I was told 99% of the time that girls are secretaries or nurses...not doctors or lawyers.

Made me all the more determined to get a professional degree...!!! Little did they know that I intended to prove them wrong! :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
42. I recognize the artist
I've seen that kind of artwork before, maybe in one of the books I read when I was a kid in the 60s.

No eyebrows would have been raised back then about these pictures.

Although my father would have complained mightily that women can't barbecue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #42
65. That artwork looks very familiar to me, as well. I was born in 1970
Edited on Sat May-02-09 01:27 AM by Quantess
and I know I saw other books from this illustrator.

Exactly. It's like, What is that little broad doing, trying to barbecue?

Personally, I'm worried about the boy's approach/technique to "eating" the "hot dog" that looks suggestively feminine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
43. Screw that!
No one touches my grill except for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
44. "Girls Use What Boys Invent" Holy shit.
Edited on Fri May-01-09 09:28 PM by Hissyspit
That's fucking stupid for the 1970s, even for the 1950s!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
46. Unfortunately, in my experience, I'll have to take issue with the "girls can cook" business....
Maybe it's a generational (or a regional) thing....

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
49. It's all offensive, but the worst is "boys are presidents,
girls are first ladies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
55. So let me get this straight:
I'm supposed to be a president who can fix a toaster and eat hot dogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #55
59. while you are inventing something, you betcha. your post make me giggle.
being the girl that i am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #55
60. dupe
Edited on Sat May-02-09 12:40 AM by seabeyond
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
61. I can't fix anything worth a crap. Does that mean I'm now a girl?
My whole gender identity has been thrown askew.

Of course, we have the reverse going on now in pop culture. Or we did, back when TV was still producing sitcoms. Just about every sitcom in the last 10 to 15 years was:

Men are buffoons. Women are smart.

Men are lazy. Women are overworked.

Men are sexual predators. Women only want love and deep emotional connections.

Dad is always wrong. Mom is always right.

Seems like the pendulum swung all the way to the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
62. You actually think "Gender-based messaging is much more subtle and nuanced these days"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #62
68. No. Sexist as ever. A slightly skewed message these days.
Now it's oversexualized, like Bratz dolls. Combined with a hyperfocus on weight, as though weight were a dichotomy.

Intellectual abilities? Right now, everyone has low expectations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
64. Heh. In my house, I'm the one who fixes stuff.
(We both cook.)

One of the most fun things about my job (high school Ceramics teacher) is sitting down at a pottery wheel and showing big tough guys how to center 10 pounds of clay in under a minute. I always tell them to start with less and they look at little old me and think "She's so short and plus, she's a girl, I can do this with more." Then they get totally in over their heads and call me over to help. I sit down and they all gather around and watch me do it. Then it gets real quiet. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
69. I'm on it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
70. it's always a bit chilling to see where we were at regarding
those societal "norms"

(shiver)

and, come to think of it, it remains a bit chilling.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. one look at the toy ads in the newspaper inserts makes it clear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlancheSplanchnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
73. I'm glad you're a ccharles!
I always like your posts

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflowergardener Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
74. Satire?
Edited on Sat May-02-09 08:55 AM by wildflowergardener
One of the comments at the link says the cartoon is satire.

The comment:
"Whitney Darrow, Jr. (August 22, 1909 – August 10, 1999) was a prominent American cartoonist, who worked most of his career for The New Yorker, with some 1,500 of his cartoons printed in his nearly 50-year-long career with the magazine.

This is satire - a joke - not a real children's book - a cartoonist's lampooning of traditional gender roles.

You fell for it."

I suppose it could be a little like the Stephen Colbert thread someplace here - that people find their own views into something they see - I don't know if it's true or not.

Editing to add: An article after his death - he was a satirist.

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/08/12/arts/whitney-darrow-jr-89-gentle-satirist-of-modern-life-dies.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
75. Anonymous said... " if this pisses off one liberal then it is worth it"
Sheesh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC