Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"There were times when David Souter thought of Bush v. Gore and wept."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 09:29 PM
Original message
"There were times when David Souter thought of Bush v. Gore and wept."
Edited on Thu Apr-30-09 09:42 PM by mb7588a
Quote from The Nine, by Jeffrey Toobin.

Hats off to a fine American, Justice David Souter. May we all have the courage to stick it to the Bush crime family as you did, so many many times.


:toast: :beer: :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. David Souter is indeed a fine American.
He was a true protector of The Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zagging Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now THAT's disinterested jurisprudence
In your opinion...or...whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. He has high standards and wept for how Bush v Gore tainted the integrity
of the US Supreme Court. I imagine he was highly interested in the integrity of the Court.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. Disinterested is not uninterested
Welcome to DU -- enjoy your stay -- and work on your vocabulary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zagging Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-02-09 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
33. My vocabulary was correct.
I found the implication of the OP's offensive.

There is a difference between sticking it to reprobate and applying a law to a circumstance. The implication was that Souter preferred the prior, which would preclude disinterest. Bush may have had it stuck to him, but only as a consequence of the law's application, not the implied stickingtoitiveness...or whatever.

I prefer my justices disinterested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. I'd imagine he would be pretty interested in maintaining the integrity of the court.
You might want to check out Free Republic. It might be a better place for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. Well, I imagine that a front row seat to a coup
should have an strong emotional impact on any person who believes in the rule of law.

Crawl back under your rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Wept"? WTF?
Perhaps the court wasn't the right place for Mr. Justice Souter.

He obviously was never very happy there.

So God bless him for waiting until now to depart.

Maybe he can now do something more than weep about that clusterfuck. Like write a book and expose the five pieces of crap that fucked up this country for 8 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Uninformed
Souter tried to sway Kennedy on that decision, and felt like he had almost succeeded before they ran out of time. Afterwards, he spoke out frequently against the decision, claiming it was a politically motivated decision and leaving no doubt on where he stood. He refused to have anything to do with the five who voted with the majority in Bush v Gore. He started to resign in protest after the decision, but was eventually persuaded that doing so would allow Bush--the person Souter considered illegally appointed to the presidency--to replace him.

Souter supposedly wept, and tried to resign, not because he hated the outcome of the decision, but because he knew it was a political decision that had tainted the judicial integrity of the Court. Souter himself was a conservative when he was appointed. He was opposed to abortion, and was seen as a sure-fire anti-abortion vote. However, when the issue came before him, he rule in favor of choice, stating that political pressure from outside shouldn't affect the judicial rulings of legal cases.

He was a strong leader, and held the integrity of the SCOTUS as his highest motivation, time after time. He felt as though the others on the Court had betrayed him and the Court and their country, and that's why he wept.

We're going to miss him when he's gone. Not just liberals, but all of America. He's what a Justice should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Nice post
Thanks for the clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Great post
People here are often too hung up appointing what they consider a "liberal" to rubber stamp their opinion to every case. Souter shows that what you really need is a clear and thoughtful interpreter of the law, unswayed by the political pressure of who gave him his job. Maybe he didn't vote the way I thought he should have on every case, but at least I knew he was guided by what he felt was truly correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TuxedoKat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Yes
This is exactly how I read the situation too. Thanks for posting this. Wish all the justices were as principled as Souter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. "Wish all the justices were as principled as Souter."
This would be a very different country if that were so.

Thanks, now I'm crying - what could've been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. An honest and honorable man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. well said n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. Thanks jobycom
that is very touching and bittersweet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. BINGO FOR YOU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Join the club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. I suspect that Sandra Day O'Connor eventually ended up weeping, too, although she helped
Edited on Thu Apr-30-09 10:14 PM by tblue37
rig the vote for Bush. After she saw how crazy, criminal, and unconstitutional the CheneyBush administration was, she went around the coutnry giving speeches against their undermining of the Constituion, hoping, I suppose, to wipe some of the filth off her good name. But of course it couldn't save her. For all time now, she is nothing but one of five thieves who gave this country over to the most criminal administration in history. Her name will live in infamy.

She wanted to retire to take care of her husband, who had Alzheimer's, but was unwilling to retire unless a Republican was in office. She felt she had a right to put a Republican in office to suit eown personal needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. k&r
he's a good man.


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. I have yet to read that
When I get home to visit this summer that's one of the books I'm going to pick up when I visit Powell's in Portland (I've made a promise to my wife that I'll only bring back 6 or 7 books and if I don't keep to that promise that she can slap me silly). I can probably find it here in Korea, but books tend to be expensive. I did find Team of Rivals by Goodwin-Kerns and am about a third of the way through it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. Powell's is one of the best book stores in the world I say.
Here in NYC, I would consier The Strand to be incredible as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. I would be like playing cards with your most trusted friends
Edited on Thu Apr-30-09 10:45 PM by DefenseLawyer
and discovering that half of them were cheating. Yeah you may have had different styles of play but you never thought they would cheat. A crushing realization, magnified about a million times when you are talking about the United States Supreme Court and the basic legal foundations of the damn country. Weep indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-30-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. The "Supreme" judicial system had become OFFICIALLY tainted. All those concerned, cried. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
20. I can understand why. I think that decision destroyed the Supreme Court's integrity in
Edited on Fri May-01-09 09:56 AM by Marr
the minds of many. It suddenly became just one more rigged political organ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. We Should Draft Justice Souter To Deal With Our War Crimes
It might be our best chance to http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5572518">begin redeem our national soul.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. Who appointed him? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. H.W. Bush n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Poppy Bush. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steven_D Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. He'll be missed
A great justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-01-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. This book is a good read that I enjoyed cover to cover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC