Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coleman Delay Strategy Working? MN Ruling Extends Appeal Schedule

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 10:42 AM
Original message
Coleman Delay Strategy Working? MN Ruling Extends Appeal Schedule
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/04/minnesota-supremes-set-schedule-for-colemans-appeal----giving-him-more-time.php?ref=fp2

Minnesota Supremes Set Schedule For Coleman's Appeal -- Giving Him More Time
By Eric Kleefeld - April 24, 2009, 10:20AM


The Minnesota Supreme Court has just issued its order establishing a schedule for Norm Coleman's appeal of the Senate election result -- and even though this schedule has been expedited by the standards of normal civil litigation, it's going to be a while by political standards.

The court adopted the proposed briefing timeline from the Coleman campaign, allowing them more time to formulate their arguments: Coleman's brief is to be submitted by next Thursday, April 30; Team Franken will submit its brief by May 11, and a reply brief from Coleman is to be submitted by May 15.

On top of that, oral arguments have been scheduled for June 1 -- a month and a week from today.

Team Franken had called for a much quicker schedule, on the grounds that greater speed was needed in order to seat a second U.S. Senator from Minnesota, and that Coleman had already had plenty of time to come up with his arguments. But the court didn't go for it.

Indeed, by any normal measure this timeline is itself a quick one for a state Supreme Court to be taking an appeal. But for the political world, this is not a normal case.

Late Update: Lead Franken attorney Marc Elias gives us this comment: "We are grateful that the court has issued an expedited scheduling order, and we look forward to the process continuing to move forward so that Sen.-elect Franken can be seated as quickly as possible."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Where's "Give em hell" Senator Harry Reid? This is so UN-SAT. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Is Harry in charge of the Minnesota supreme court now?
Gosh, he sure is powerful.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Elections are a state issue. Harry Reid is not involved
in Minnesota elections. Were he to seat Franken before the state process was finished, then there would be grounds for the SCOTUS to grant certiorari. If it goes until the state law is satisfied, there won't be such grounds.

This needs to be settled under Minnesota law or it will go to the SCOTUS for sure. Justice must not only be done, it must be seen as having been done.

More patience will be needed, but we will win in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Marc Elias - always the professional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm an incorrigible fatalist, I guess.
This will grind on until justice is not only done, but is seen to have been done. The MN Supreme Court has set a schedule that nobody will be able to claim does not allow both sides to present their arguments.

It's too slow for my taste, of course, but it's not going to change. Al Franken will be seated at some point and Norm Coleman will go away. I wish it could be sooner, but there's no legal way for that to happen.

It was a close, close race. It will take whatever time it takes to be settled. I'm just glad the initial vote count was not the final one, you know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC