Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should governments ban the R-word?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:25 PM
Original message
Should governments ban the R-word?
By ANDREA BALL

Cox Newspapers



AUSTIN, Texas -- Claudia Cardenas has heard the “R-word” her whole life.

Ugly retard. Stupid retard. Slow retard.

She’s been taunted in school cafeterias, classrooms and hallways; by relatives, classmates and strangers; at home, in public and in front of friends. And it always hurt.

“I’ve been called retarded all my life,” said Cardenas, a 39-year-old Beeville, Texas, woman who has her own apartment, volunteers regularly and wants to start a business that is an advocate for people with disabilities. “It made me feel like I was nobody.”

It’s been decades since advocates began fighting to end derogatory language about people with mental disabilities.

Today, some once-common terms used to describe them -- “feebleminded,” “Mongoloid,” and “imbecile” -- are all but gone. But the word “retarded” remains.

Now the R-word, as disabilities advocates call it, is the target of a national campaign to eliminate its use in both government and casual conversation. Through legislation and public relations campaigns, they’re trying to change the country’s vocabulary.

more . . . http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/18126
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Republican? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. With all the political correctness going on it's a wonder we can say anything anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a shit-for-brains idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iris27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't believe the government ever banned the n-word or anything like it.
Social pressure and awareness campaigns should be sufficient, thanks.

I try to keep all such vocab out of my lingo, the n-word, retard, "that's lame", etc., but I don't think this is something you legislate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. There is a history of legislating this sort of change
Medical terms have evolved over the years.

This is about an official change for legal paperwork. I don't have a problem with that.

I am a special ed teacher and I would really rather not tell parents their child is retarded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm with Fergie on this one
Edited on Mon Apr-20-09 05:47 PM by imdjh
She was making a typically compassionate and respectful statement regarding her charity for retarded children, when Bill Maher made a face and she stopped and asked him what that was for. He said, "We don't use the word retarded, we say developmentally disabled." Her response was, "Yes, that's what retarded means." See also George Carlin who points out that
"people of color" and "colored people" not only means the same thing, it's the same words.

We need to stop interrupting conversation to police terminology when the only thing of concern ought to be the intent. If you can't tell someone's intent, then don't listen to them. If you can tell their intent, then stop interrupting them. I have a fairly new policy in real life, when someone interrupts me to correct my terminology, which is every bit as rude as interrupting someone to correct his grammar, I simply don't finish the discussion. I either say, "OK, what would you like to talk about?" or I leave.

The fact that "retard" is a lasting thing for namecallers to say doesn't change the word retarded, just as people saying "developmentally disabled" in a tone of voice which lets you know that they aren't being respectful changes the meaning of those words when I used them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is certainly wrong to use it as a pejorative...
but there is nothing wrong with the term "mental retardation"
Although here we use "intellectually disabled" (mildly, moderately, severely, profoundly)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. "***'* *** **** "= "Let's all talk" in asterisks* so that no one will be
offended ever again, until someone is found who is offended by asterisks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coffee and Cake Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC