|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 05:49 AM Original message |
John Edwards investigation reported |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 05:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. What a fucking shame. Why are we men such idiots sometimes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 05:52 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Not ALL men. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 05:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Agreed, but a sizeable percentage to be sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 09:55 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. I think that size increases with the power they hold. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 05:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. It is a shame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 05:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I wonder about that sometimes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 05:57 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. WTF? Men are not more sexually charged than women. IMO many are conditioned by society to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:00 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I've actually met about as many women cheaters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:18 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Blah blah blah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:23 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. There's no need for that. You understand that my intention was only to stand up for both genders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannie4peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:17 AM Response to Reply #1 |
15. they are ruled by their wang, not their brain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Yes, that's because SOCIETY says that they must. Where does "nature" end and "nurture" begin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannie4peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 04:24 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. i'll accept that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zazen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 05:58 AM Response to Original message |
7. WTF??!! investigate ex-candidate's affair and not TORTURE or Siegelman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 05:59 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. There's that little FLAW of alleged funneling of campaign monies to his Mistress. Uncool? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:01 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. True, very uncool but it does kind of pale in comparison to the criminals going free. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:03 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. No, you're correct comparatively, but it still is potentially illegal. If we are to be fair we ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:01 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. if he diverted campaign money to his mistress, that's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
12. Edwards is the candidate I initially supported in the presidential race..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:05 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Oh yeah, it would have been all over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:24 AM Response to Original message |
18. The Perils Of Power And Ego...The Ultimate Aphrodisiac |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
20. Good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rusty fender (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
22. It's about time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal813 (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 03:23 AM Response to Original message |
24. Where did the money come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 03:27 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. If he did, I hope the entire thing is quietly dropped. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 03:41 AM Response to Original message |
26. I see a trial is no longer necessary for a conviction... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 04:00 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Deleted message |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 04:03 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. ridiculous. no one here is on a jury. everyone is free to speculate- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-07-09 05:07 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. PAIA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 01:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC