Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards investigation reported

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:49 AM
Original message
John Edwards investigation reported

Published: Fri, Apr. 03, 2009 02:00AMModified Fri, Apr. 03, 2009 05:48AM

The National Enquirer reported on its Web site that a federal grand jury in Raleigh is investigating whether former Sen. John Edwards violated campaign-finance laws in his bid for president in 2008 by making payments to Rielle Hunter, his admitted mistress.

U.S. Attorney George Holding said Thursday that he "was not going to confirm or deny any investigation" regarding Edwards.

A federal grand jury was convened in Raleigh on Wednesday. Grand jury proceedings are secret.


John Edwards investigation reported

Such grand juries have the power to call and question witnesses and request documents. Prosecutors interview witnesses in front of jurors. At the end of the query, the grand jury has the power to bring charges.

Wade Smith, a prominent Raleigh defense attorney and Edwards mentor, declined to comment on whether he was representing Edwards.

"I'm at a place where I cannot make any comment to confirm or deny," Smith said. "I can't say anything. It's possible, at some later point, I can."

<snip>

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1469531.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a fucking shame. Why are we men such idiots sometimes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not ALL men.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Agreed, but a sizeable percentage to be sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. I think that size increases with the power they hold. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It is a shame.
For Elizabeth's sake, I really wish this wasn't happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I wonder about that sometimes.
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 05:57 AM by onehandle
Then I think about how much I love women and remember why.

I've been stupid for my wife for almost 18 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. WTF? Men are not more sexually charged than women. IMO many are conditioned by society to
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 05:58 AM by ShortnFiery
think and behave as if they are to meet and act-out "sex role stereotypes."

That said, even if you believe that men are more sexual, it does not excuse marital infidelity NOR financial malfeasance of campaign funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I've actually met about as many women cheaters
I'n my life at least I've been cheated on as much as I've cheated on others so I guess maybe there is a karmic balance to it. That being said, when you're trying to be President AND you have a sick wife, you buck the fuck up and be better than the average Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Blah blah blah.
Did I say more?

Did I say anything you said?

No.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. There's no need for that. You understand that my intention was only to stand up for both genders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. they are ruled by their wang, not their brain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yes, that's because SOCIETY says that they must. Where does "nature" end and "nurture" begin?
We can't tease out those factors within social science research. But I'm often "in awe" of the women and men who readily adopt the "men are all horny hound dogs" stereotype. Not necessarily true - perhaps a little physiologically but also because MANY have been socialized to behave as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. i'll accept that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. WTF??!! investigate ex-candidate's affair and not TORTURE or Siegelman?
I'd venture to guess there are at least 25,000 crimes by elected officials and their appointees committed in the past 15 years that are of greater severity than Edwards' affair and whether he paid his ex-lover for campaign services. Lots of people are paid dollops for crappy, insubstantial work . . . board members, well connected "advisors," etc, etc. Who gives a shit? Sounds like she actually did _some_ work, which is more than I can for several well paid, ex-political university appointees here in Raleigh who are given plum six-figure incomes for leading "leadership" initiatives while secretaries are being laid off.

ARRGHHHHHH! Leave that family alone!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. There's that little FLAW of alleged funneling of campaign monies to his Mistress. Uncool? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. True, very uncool but it does kind of pale in comparison to the criminals going free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. No, you're correct comparatively, but it still is potentially illegal. If we are to be fair we ...
should investigate and prosecute ALL violations. We agree in that regard - IMO, it's "small-teeny tiny" compared to what the Bush Administration did with our country. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. if he diverted campaign money to his mistress, that's
a serious offense. And the crimes you mentioned, aren't in the same jurisdiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. Edwards is the candidate I initially supported in the presidential race.....
..... and I still like him a lot.....but I'm really glad he wasn't the eventual nominee.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Oh yeah, it would have been all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. The Perils Of Power And Ego...The Ultimate Aphrodisiac
It's a shame that Senator Edwards let the wrong head do the thinking and now could face criinal charges for his stupidity. I feel for Elizabeth, in specific, who appears to be the biggest victim of his lies and fall.

This is just another power and glory story...another man driven not only by his politics and ideals, but, unfortunately, by a large ego and libido. Who knows how many affairs he had or how this one began, it's an age-old mixture of endorphins and their own fame/invinsibility that leads to a mighty fall. This isn't the first, it isn't the last...and each time it not only destroys the politician, but shatters his/her family and the many who put faith in him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. Good.
I'm disappointed that he donned the mantle of repentance while studiously avoiding any talk of returning the money. That's not change; that's more of the same.

If this is criminal (and it ought to be), prosecute his ass.

Meanwhile, his agenda on poverty is nigh-forgotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty fender Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
22. It's about time!
He committed outright fraud by declaring for the presidential primary while knowingly having an affair and funneling money to his mistress to keep her quiet. Many scumbags are married to nice women. That doesn't mean that criminal activities shouldn't be prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal813 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
24. Where did the money come from?
If you never knew Fred Baron personally, then you may find it difficult to understand the level of compassion and generosity he was capable of. For those who were privileged to work with him, it is highly plausible that he independently provided financial assistance to 2 former campaign workers. Keep in mind that Ms. Hunter, along with Andrew Young and his family, were not celebrities, but private citizens, being harassed by the National Enquirer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. If he did, I hope the entire thing is quietly dropped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
26. I see a trial is no longer necessary for a conviction...
I also see that they're still afraid of Edwards and the possibility that he could return to politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. ridiculous. no one here is on a jury. everyone is free to speculate-
as we do about just about everything. And I completely doubt that anyone is afraid of Edwards as a political force. He's done for a goodly number of years, regardless of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-07-09 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. PAIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC