Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Fundie War on Sex continues: New NC bill promotes youth promiscuity through the 'backdoor'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:27 PM
Original message
The Fundie War on Sex continues: New NC bill promotes youth promiscuity through the 'backdoor'
Edited on Sat Mar-28-09 05:32 PM by marmar
Just when you think they can't get anymore barking-at-cars insane..... :crazy:



from the anti-sex OneNewsNow of the American Family Assn:



NC's 'Healthy Youth Act' healthy in name only
Charlie Butts and Jody Brown - OneNewsNow - 3/27/2009 7:00:00 AM


The vast majority of North Carolina school districts teach abstinence until marriage -- but one family advocate in the Tar Heel State says a backdoor approach is under way in the legislature to push an agenda that promotes promiscuity.

Mark Creech, executive director of the Christian Action League (CAL), tells OneNewsNow that under the proposed bill -- the "Healthy Youth Act" (House Bill 88) -- most students just might get the latter. "Unless parents intervene, seventh- through ninth-graders are going to be instructed on how to use more than a dozen contraceptives, ranging from condoms to 'morning-after' pills," he warns. "This bill is dangerous on several fronts...."

According to Creech, the measure labels so-called comprehensive sex-ed as "abstinence-based."

"...But this is truly a misnomer," the family advocate argues in a CAL article. "Call it what you will, 'abstinence-based comprehensive sex-ed' is simply a repackaging of the 'safe-sex' approach.

Figures on ten districts in the state that use the comprehensive sex-ed approach indicate that it is a failure in terms of preventing teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

Creech stresses that another section of the bill would teach acceptance of homosexual relationships. He quotes the provision:

"'Respect for marriage and committed relationships,'" he quotes. "Now what that does is (open) the door to present unmarried, heterosexual relationships as well as homosexual, bisexual, and multi-partner relationships on the very same footing as marriage." And that, he emphasizes, is the wrong standard for North Carolina.

The bill could come up for a hearing next week, so the Christian Action League is depending on grassroots efforts to convince lawmakers to vote no.

H.B. 88 is endorsed by Equality North Carolina, an advocacy organization for homosexual, bisexual, and transgender issues.


http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=466794 (if rickrolled, the story's in the onenewsnow area of www.afa.net )



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. A "backdoor" sex article written by Butts & Brown? The Onion couldn't
come up with this stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Onion would reject it as too unrealistic.....
:)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. OMG! I didn't notice the names.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who wrote this??
Bill Maher? Jon Stewart? With a name like Charlie Butts, I suppose backdoor double-entendre is just second nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. A "backdoor" approach? I'm as open minded as the next person, but...
That's just kind of nasty. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where is Santorum when you need it, err him?
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Methinks "Charlie Butts" doth protesteth too much. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-28-09 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. I swear to God, this shit just writes itself.
But I'd love to hear Mr. Butts complain about backdoor sex education in front of the legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC