Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terrible News for Wolves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 10:04 AM
Original message
Terrible News for Wolves
Edited on Sun Mar-08-09 10:06 AM by G_j
3/6/09
I have some terrible news. Today, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced that he would follow the discredited path of the Bush Administration and delist wolves in the Northern Rockies and Greater Yellowstone region.

This is a stunning development, just six weeks into the Obama Administration. This delisting paves the way for almost 1000 wolves to be killed under deadly state management plans in Idaho and Montana.

The killing could begin in just weeks.

As I write this, we are already preparing an emergency legal challenge to this harmful proposal -- and we’ll be in court as quickly as possible. But we need your help for the legal fight ahead.

Please make an emergency donation now to support our Northern Rockies and Greater Yellowstone Wolf Legal Defense Fund.

here: http://action.defenders.org/site/PageServer?pagename=savewolves_homepage


This delisting will put the fate of our wolves in the hands of state governments that want to slaughter nearly 1,000 wolves. Last year, when federal wolf protections were temporarily lifted in the region, more than 100 wolves were killed in just a short time -- including the world renowned “Limpy.”

In addition, regular wolf hunting seasons could begin as early as this fall in Idaho and Montana -- and Idaho Governor “Butch” Otter said again today that he still wants the first available hunting tag to shoot a wolf himself.

We can’t allow the out-of-control killing of wolves to happen again.

Please donate now to support our emergency legal challenge to protect our wolves in the Northern Rockies.

For more than 35 years, Defenders of Wildlife has fought for our wolves. We were there when the first wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park and we’ve been there to defend them ever since. We’ve beaten back efforts to prematurely delist these wolves in the past, and I'm confident we can do so again.

Just this week, we celebrated a hard-fought victory made possible with your help as the Senate voted to overturn the Bush Administration's last-minute gutting of the Endangered Species Act. We now need to beat back another deadly Bush-era plan that will open the door to the slaughter of nearly 1,000 wolves.

Please donate what you can today to save the lives of wolves in the Northern Rockies and Greater Yellowstone.

Together, we can win our legal challenge of the same bad plan originally put forth in the last throes of the Bush Administration -- and ensure that our wolves will continue to be around for future generations.

Sincerely,

Rodger Schlickeisen
President
Defenders of Wildlife






http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/outposts/2009/03/photo-a-gray-wo.html

Gray wolf removal from Endangered Species Act protection affirmed
8:53 PM, March 6, 2009

The decision to remove some gray wolf populations from protection under the Endangered Species Act will proceed as originally announced in January.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar stated today that he will uphold the decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to delist wolf populations in the northern Rockies and western Great Lakes states of Idaho, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Utah and Wisconsin, plus portions of Washington, Oregon and Utah.

"The recovery of the gray wolf throughout significant portions of its historic range is one of the great success stories of the Endangered Species Act," Salazar said in a press release issued by the U.S. Department of the Interior. "The successful recovery of this species is a stunning example of how the Act can work to keep imperiled animals from sliding into extinction."

Wolves in Wyoming will continue to be protected under the act, due to an inadequate wolf management plan, as will wolves in other parts of the country, including the Southwest.

This delisting will take effect 30 days after publication in the Federal Register and will mean that wolf management will become a job for state and tribal wildlife agencies instead of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

However, the Fish and Wildlife Service will monitor the delisted wolf populations for a minimum of five years to ensure that they continue to sustain their recovery. At the end of that time, they will decide if relisting, continued monitoring or ending service monitoring is appropriate.

While some state Fish and Game departments and outdoor organizations such as the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation applaud the decision to move ahead with the delisting, environmental groups such as Defenders of Wildlife and the Center for Biological Diversity vehemently oppose it and are threatening lawsuits to overturn the plan.

--Kelly Burgess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R & Donated!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. thanks,
:yourock: !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. along with pursuing Bush's executive privilege claims in the court case, the other "shittiest thing"
about our new (?) administration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. they'll take it to court
. . . but they have to wait 60 days before they can file to get an injunction. I expect the local legislatures to continue to wrangle over it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why would the Obama Administration take this stance?
This is extremely disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Did Obama say he was an environmentalist? I don't remember him ever saying so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. are you saying he isn't?
are you saying we should not be disappointed if he doesn't protect the environment?

geeezzz... what next? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ok, now that's a bit much. I asked a question and you answered with a rather hostile question.
I am merely asking. DId he? I don't remember him saying that. So, it is not too much of a surprise to me that this is happening. Didn't he say he was going to be center and listen to both sides?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm just tired of hearing that answer
we'll be hearing a lot more of, "Obama never promised" over Afghanistan.
But It's not a substantive, or useful argument.

Obama did say he would do what is right, so I'll take that as an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRiverMan Donating Member (693 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-08-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. The wolves were already delisted in Montana and Idaho
they were delisted in Wyoming then put back on due to the state's rather screwed up mananagement plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for posting this.
I got the same e-mail and was going to post it here, but you beat me to it. It IS terrible news, very upsetting, and I hope Defenders of Wildlife and other groups fight it off. This will be my March donation, as much as I can spare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I echo your thoughts and I too will donate to DOW...
Edited on Mon Mar-09-09 08:11 PM by RiverStone
Why are some people so fucking arrogant and believe men (man) must dominant the planet?

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. The ESA is a complicated law
with complicated provisions.

Species are not supposed to spend forever on the list, and under the original 1974 listing provisions the species is considered fully recovered.

This is not a Bush thing, or an Obama thing. It's a Nixon thing. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-09-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I've been supporting Defenders of Wildlife for years
and I do trust their judgment on these matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC