Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

obesity, a different historical &cultural perspective..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 05:07 PM
Original message
obesity, a different historical &cultural perspective..
Our present distaste for fat bodies runs counter not only to most of history but also - it seems - to evolution. The evidence lies in the comparisons we like to make between ourselves and other animals. We agonise about what, if anything, makes humans different.

One answer - and one we are generally reluctant to give - is that we are exceptionally fat animals. The biologist Caroline Pond has pointed out that an average middle-aged modern Western woman, with a body-mass index well short of overweight, has relatively more adipose tissue in her body by weight than a penguin or a polar bear. No other animal secretes so much fat, proportionately, in so many areas of the body as humans. We do not know the evolutionary reason for this - but presumably there must be one.
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=193257§ioncode=26

Fascinating stuff this article..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting
I think I agree with the author.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. What was healthy for our long-ago ancestors is not for us.
We crave salt: we developed in salt-deficient areas.

We love fat: fat was hard for our early ancestors to get, and they had to run and fight hard to get it -- we were cursorial hunters, often slower than our prey but able to outlast them and wear them down.

Now we are largely sedentary but have unrestricted access to salt and fat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. that was interesting
it makes one wonder where we would be if we were constantly indoctrinated with larger people in hollywood, american idol etc. You can see it in our tv culture in just the last 40 years, Marilyn Monroe would probably be considered fat now.
TV stars are getting skinnier and skinnier, the standards that are being set now are absurd not to mention unhealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC