Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MN-Sen Events v. 89.0; Norm's Case Rests

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:22 PM
Original message
MN-Sen Events v. 89.0; Norm's Case Rests
Great Recap, analysis and predictions. Too much to condense

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/3/2/75844/18992/652/703130

(tiny part)

Summary: Coleman needs to show the court why any, some or all of these ~2000 should be opened and counted (Thats right. They are still sealed and NO ONE KNOWS how they will break. Coleman picked them from precincts and counties around the state that otherwise went for him, so he's playing the odds, but its still trying to draw a K-Q to fill in your 10-J-Ace.) Still, there is perhaps enough uncertainty here that the Court will let this go to the Franken side of the case. Its hardly been proven, but the math is still 2000 maybes vs. a +249 lead. Also I think the Court will order the remaining "5th pile" ballots (about 400). The remaining 933 broke in Franken's favor by +176....so by the same measure these 400 or so should break for Franken at least +70.....

Prediction: These aren't counted yet, and those that are registered still have to pass the other 3 gates (like did voter vote in person? If so, absentee ballot is canceled.) Best guess around the internet is broadly 600-900 of the 1500 may be valid on this matter. If so, and if they otherwise pass muster, I think the Court will eventually order these opened and counted, probably by the Sec. of State's office. We'll see.

Kos number cruncher Vote for America has up a detailed analysis of the Pile 3A issue here:http://www.dailykos.com/...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think the judges need to pick up their gavels and pound
it into Normie's head that we're all tired of his wasting time and tax money on this obstructionist game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well said
And I wouldn't be a bit surprised if the judges are getting to just that point. You do NOT jerk judges around the way the Greaseweasel has and find them smiling benignly down upon you. I clerked for a couple of judges. They ALWAYS remember every sneaky trick an attorney has tried during the course of a trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC